A correlation study of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score and the Oxford Shoulder Score with the use of regression analysis to predict one score from the other in patients undergoing reverse shoulder joint arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy

Abstract

Background

More than 30 different scoring systems are available for evaluating outcomes of shoulder surgery. Unfortunately, given the multitude of scoring systems, there is no objective method to compare results between studies when different scoring systems are utilized.

Methods

We compared the American Shoulder and Elbow Society score (ASES) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy. Twenty-nine patients had the ASES and OSS recorded pre-operatively, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. The paired scores were assessed for their degree of correlation and sensitivity to change over time. Linear regression analysis was used to formulate a regression equation to predict one score from the other.

Results

The ASES and OSS correlated well with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.91 (p < 0.0001, n = 87). Both scores were sensitive to change. Regression analysis yielded a formula to predict the ASES from the OSS and vice versa with good accuracy (r²= 0.83, F_1,85 = 422.6, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Where good correlation exists, regression formulae can be used to accurately predict one score from the other in a specific population that it has been validated for. This can be of benefit when objectively comparing outcomes between studies using these two scoring systems.

Keywords

Shoulder outcome American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score Oxford Shoulder Score patient-reported outcome regression analysis correlating scores reverse shoulder joint arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wright

Baumgarten

. Shoulder outcome measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18: 436–44.

Katolik

Romeo

Cole

. Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 279–85.

Baker

Nanda

Goodchild

Finn

Rangan

. A comparison of the Constant and Oxford shoulder scores in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 37–41.

Richards

K-N

Bigliani

Friedman

. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3: 347–352.

Dawson

Fitzpatrick

Carr

. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996; 78B: 593–600.

Gastaldo

Fissore

Gennari

. A reliability study of the ASES Score and Oxford Score in patients affected by shoulder disease. Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2012; 63: 169–76.