Evaluating strategies and outcomes following rotator cuff tears

Abstract

Introduction

Rotator cuff tear surgical repair techniques have significantly progressed. However, tendon retear following primary repair persistently occurs at high rates. Rehabilitation protocols, surgical fixation techniques, biologic therapy with scaffolds, platelet-rich plasma, and even stem cell applications are under study to promote adequate tendon healing.

Methods

A nonsystematic query of the PubMed database was conducted in July 2016 utilizing the search terms “rotator cuff repair,” “tear,” “rehabilitation,” “scaffold,” “platelet-rich plasma,” and “stem cell” to identify, analyze, and summarize relevant studies.

Conclusion

Individualized rehabilitation protocols may be the best approach for small to medium sized tears. Surgical fixation will continue to be debated as modifications to single-row technique and increases in suture number have improved tensile strength. Double-row repairs have been associated with higher costs. Transosseous equivalent technique exhibits comparable subjective and objective outcomes to single- and double-row repair at two-year follow-up. Biocompatible scaffold augmentation has showed inconsistent short-term results. Platelet-rich plasma has lacked uniformity in treatment preparation, administration, and outcome measurement with mixed results. Few human studies have suggested decreased retear rates and improved repair maintenance following bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell augmentation. This review reiterated the necessity of additional high-quality, large-sample studies to develop any final verdict regarding efficacy.

Keywords

platelet-rich plasma rehabilitation rotator cuff repair rotator cuff tear scaffold stem cell

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wolf

Hall

et al.

Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Clin Orthop 2007; 455: 52–63.

Yamamoto

Takagishi

Osawa

et al.

Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 116–120.

Park

Cho

Song

et al.

Rotator cuff repair in patients over 75 years of age: clinical outcome and repair integrity. Clin Orthop Surg 2016; 8: 420–427.

Osborne

Gowda

Wiater

et al.

Rotator cuff rehabilitation: current theories and practice. Phys Sportsmed 2016; 44: 85–92.

McElvany

McGoldrick

Gee

et al.

Rotator cuff repair published evidence on factors associated with repair integrity and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 491–500.

Moosmayer

Lund

Seljom

et al.

Tendon repair compared with physiotherapy in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled study in 103 cases with a five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 1504–1514.

Kukkonen

Joukainen

Itälä

et al.

Operatively treated traumatic versus non-traumatic rotator cuff ruptures: a registry study. Ups J Med Sci 2013; 118: 29–34.

Beaudreuil

Dhénain

Coudane

et al.

Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical management of rotator cuff tears in adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 175–179.

Saltzman

Jain

Campbell

et al.

Does the use of platelet-rich plasma at the time of surgery improve clinical outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair when compared with control cohorts? A systematic review of meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 2015; 32: 906–918.

10.

Thangarajah

Pendegrass

Shahbazi

et al.

Augmentation of rotator cuff repair with soft tissue scaffolds. Orthop J Sports Med 2015; 3: 2325967115587495–2325967115587495. (online only).

11.

Anz

Hackel

Nilssen

et al.

Application of biologics in the treatment of the rotator cuff, meniscus, cartilage, and osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22: 68–79.

12.

Fermont

AJM

Wolterbeek

Wessel

et al.

Prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic literature review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44: 153–163.

13.

Lambers Heerspink

Dorrestijn

van Raay

JJAM

et al.

Specific patient-related prognostic factors for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 1073–1080.

14.

Woollard

Bost

Piva

et al.

The relationship of preoperative factors to patient-reported outcome in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev 2016; 21: 138–150.

15.

Santiago-Torres

Flanigan

Butler

et al.

The effect of smoking on rotator cuff and glenoid labrum surgery: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 745–751.

16.

Kim

Caldwell

J-ME

Buza

et al.

Factors affecting satisfaction and shoulder function in patients with a recurrent rotator cuff tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 106–112.

17.

Lafosse

Brzoska

Toussaint

et al.

The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 275–286.

18.

Encalada-Diaz

Cole

MacGillivray

et al.

Rotator cuff repair augmentation using a novel polycarbonate polyurethane patch: preliminary results at 12 months’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 788–794.

19.

Galatz

Ball

Teefey

et al.

The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 219–224.

20.

Galatz

. Nicotine delays tendon-to-bone healing in a rat shoulder model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2027–2027.

21.

Harryman

Mack

Wang

et al.

Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 982–989.

22.

Cho

Lee

et al.

Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 664–671.

23.

Gusmer

Potter

Donovan

et al.

MR imaging of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 559–563.

24.

Magee

Gaenslen

Seitz

et al.

MR imaging of the shoulder after surgery. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 925–928.

25.

Owen

Iannotti

Kneeland

et al.

Shoulder after surgery: MR imaging with surgical validation. Radiology 1993; 186: 443–447.

26.

Sugaya

Maeda

Matsuki

et al.

Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 953–960.

27.

Baums

Spahn

Steckel

et al.

Comparative evaluation of the tendon-bone interface contact pressure in different single- versus double-row suture anchor repair techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17: 1466–1472.

28.

Braun

Millett

Yongpravat

et al.

Biomechanical evaluation of shear force vectors leading to injury of the biceps reflection pulley: a biplane fluoroscopy study on cadaveric shoulders. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 1015–1024.

29.

Kim

ElAttrache

Tibone

et al.

Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 407–414.

30.

Gerber

Schneeberger

Beck

et al.

Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76-B: 371–380.

31.

Mazzocca

Millett

Guanche

et al.

Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33: 1861–1868.

32.

Nelson

Sileo

Grossman

et al.

Single-row modified Mason-Allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison. Arthroscopy 2008; 24: 941–948.

33.

Mahar

Tamborlane

Oka

et al.

Single-row suture anchor repair of the rotator cuff is biomechanically equivalent to double-row repair in a bovine model. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 1265–1270.

34.

Zhao

. Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 182–188.

35.

Chen

Dong

et al.

Outcomes of single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Arthroscopy 2013; 29: 1437–1449.

36.

Duquin

Buyea

Bisson

. Which method of rotator cuff repair leads to the highest rate of structural healing?: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 835–841.

37.

Arndt

Calvert

Mielcarek

et al.

Immediate passive motion versus immobilization after endoscopic supraspinatus tendon repair: a prospective randomized study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98: S131–S138.

38.

Chang

K-V

Hung

C-Y

Han

D-S

et al.

Early versus delayed passive range of motion exercise for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 1265–1273.

39.

Cuff

Pupello

. Prospective randomized study of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an early versus delayed postoperative physical therapy protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21: 1450–1455.

40.

Duzgun

Baltaci

Atay

. Comparison of slow and accelerated rehabilitation protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: pain and functional activity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2011; 45: 23–33.

41.

Kim

Y-S

Chung

Kim

et al.

Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?

Am J Sports Med 2012; 40: 815–821.

42.

Koh

Lim

Shon

et al.

Effect of immobilization without passive exercise after rotator cuff repair: randomized clinical trial comparing four and eight weeks of immobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: e44–e44.

43.

Lee

Cho

Rhee

. Effect of two rehabilitation protocols on range of motion and healing rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: aggressive versus limited early passive exercises. Arthroscopy 2012; 28: 34–42.

44.

McCormick

Wilcox

Alqueza

. Postoperative rotator cuff repair rehabilitation and complication management. Oper Tech Orthop 2015; 25: 76–82.

45.

Raab

Rzeszutko

O’Connor

et al.

Early results of continuous passive motion after rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study. Am J Orthop 1996; 25: 214–220.

46.

Sheps

Bouliane

Styles-Tripp

et al.

Early mobilisation following mini-open rotator cuff repair: a randomised control trial. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B: 1257–1263.

47.

Proctor

. Long-term successful arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears with a functional and degradable reinforcement device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 1508–1513.

48.

Burkhart

Ricchetti

Levine

et al.

Challenges and controversies in treating massive rotator cuff tears. Instr Course Lect 2016; 65: 93–108.

49.

Pittenger

Mackay

Beck

et al.

Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999; 284: 143–147.

50.

Utsunomiya

Uchida

Sekiya

et al.

Isolation and characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from shoulder tissues involved in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 657–668.

51.

Wang

Breidahl

Mackie

et al.

Autologous tenocyte injection for the treatment of severe, chronic resistant Lateral Epicondylitis a pilot study. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 2925–2932.

52.

Clarke

Alyas

Morris

et al.

Skin-derived tenocyte-like cells for the treatment of patellar tendinopathy. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 614–623.

53.

Iannotti

Deutsch

Green

et al.

Time to failure after rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 965–971.

54.

Kim

Hong

Ryu

et al.

Retear rate in the late postoperative period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42: 2606–2613.

55.

Galatz

Charlton

Das

et al.

Complete removal of load is detrimental to rotator cuff healing. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 669–675.

56.

Peltz

Sarver

Dourte

et al.

Exercise following a short immobilization period is detrimental to tendon properties and joint mechanics in a rat rotator cuff injury model. J Orthop Res 2010; 28: 841–845.

57.

McCann

PDMD

Wootten

MEMS

Kadaba

et al.

A kinematic and electromyographic study of shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Clin Orthop 1993; 288: 179–188.

58.

Hatakeyama

Itoi

Pradhan

et al.

Effect of arm elevation and rotation on the strain in the repaired rotator cuff tendon a Cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 788–794.

59.

McCormick

Wilson

Gupta

et al.

Single-row, double-row, and transosseous equivalent techniques for isolated supraspinatus tendon tears with minimal atrophy: a retrospective comparative outcome and radiographic analysis at minimum 2-year followup. Int J Shoulder Surg 2014; 8: 15–15.

60.

Koh

Kang

Lim

et al.

Prospective randomized clinical trial of single- versus double-row suture anchor repair in 2- to 4-cm rotator cuff tears: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Arthroscopy 2011; 27: 453–462.

61.

Burks

Crim

Brown

et al.

A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 674–682.

62.

Provencher

Kercher

Galatz

et al.

Evolution of rotator cuff repair techniques: are our patients really benefiting?

Instr Course Lect 2011; 60: 123–136.

63.

Denard

Burkhart

. The evolution of suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2013; 29: 1589–1595.

64.

Burkhart

Diaz Pagàn

Wirth

et al.

Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy 1997; 13: 720–724.

65.

Skaliczki

Paladini

Merolla

et al.

Early anchor displacement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Int Orthop 2015; 39: 915–920.

66.

Benson

MacDermid

Drosdowech

et al.

The incidence of early metallic suture anchor pullout after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2010; 26: 310–315.

67.

Galland

Airaudi

Gravier

et al.

Pullout strength of all suture anchors in the repair of rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 2017–2023.

68.

Kaar

Schenck

Wirth

et al.

Complications of metallic suture anchors in shoulder surgery: a report of 8 cases. Arthroscopy 2001; 17: 31–37.

69.

Barber

Herbert

Beavis

. Cyclic load and failure behavior of arthroscopic knots and high strength sutures. Arthroscopy 2009; 25: 192–199.

70.

Alan Barber

Herbert

Hapa

et al.

Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update. Arthroscopy 2011; 27: 895–905.

71.

Apreleva

Ozbaydar

Fitzgibbons

et al.

Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: 519–526.

72.

Meier

. Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 691–696.

73.

Gerber

Schneeberger

Perren

et al.

Experimental rotator cuff repair. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81: 1281–1290.

74.

Lorbach

Baums

Kostuj

et al.

Advances in biology and mechanics of rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23: 530–541.

75.

Genuario

Donegan

Hamman

et al.

The cost-effectiveness of single-row compared with double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg 2012; 94: 1369–1377.

76.

Black

Austin

Narzikul

et al.

Arthroscopic anchorless vs. anchored rotator cuff repair: are the cost savings worth the hassle?

J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: e238–e239.

77.

Gupta

Hug

Boggess

et al.

Massive or 2-tendon rotator cuff tears in active patients with minimal glenohumeral arthritis: clinical and radiographic outcomes of reconstruction using dermal tissue matrix xenograft. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 872–879.

78.

Badhe

Lawrence

Smith

et al.

An assessment of porcine dermal xenograft as an augmentation graft in the treatment of extensive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: S35–S39.

79.

Phipatanakul

Petersen

. Porcine small intestine submucosa xenograft augmentation in repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Orthop 2009; 38: 572–575.

80.

Iannotti

Codsi

Kwon

et al.

Porcine small intestine submucosa augmentation of surgical repair of chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tears. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1238–1244.

81.

Walton

Bowman

Khatib

et al.

Restore orthobiologic implant: not recommended for augmentation of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 786–791.

82.

Barber

Burns

Deutsch

et al.

A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2012; 28: 8–15.

83.

Lenart

Martens

Kearns

et al.

Treatment of massive and recurrent rotator cuff tears augmented with a poly-l-lactide graft, a preliminary study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 915–921.

84.

Ciampi

Scotti

Nonis

et al.

The benefit of synthetic versus biological patch augmentation in the repair of posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears a 3-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42: 1169–1175.

85.

Malavolta

Gracitelli

MEC

Ferreira Neto

et al.

Platelet-rich plasma in rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42: 2446–2454.

86.

Weber

Kauffman

Parise

et al.

Platelet-rich fibrin matrix in the management of arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 263–270.

87.

Bergeson

Tashjian

Greis

et al.

Effects of platelet-rich fibrin matrix on repair integrity of at-risk rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40: 286–293.

88.

Randelli

Arrigoni

Ragone

et al.

Platelet rich plasma in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective RCT study, 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 518–528.

89.

Barber

Hrnack

Snyder

et al.

Rotator cuff repair healing influenced by platelet-rich plasma construct augmentation. Arthroscopy 2011; 27: 1029–1035.

90.

Castricini

Longo

De Benedetto

et al.

Platelet-rich plasma augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 258–265.

91.

Castillo

Pouliot

Kim

et al.

Comparison of growth factor and platelet concentration from commercial platelet-rich plasma separation systems. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 266–271.

92.

Sundman

Cole

Fortier

. Growth factor and catabolic cytokine concentrations are influenced by the cellular composition of platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 2135–2140.

93.

Würgler-Hauri

Dourte

Baradet

et al.

Temporal expression of 8 growth factors in tendon-to-bone healing in a rat supraspinatus model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: S198–S203.

94.

Mishra

Tummala

King

et al.

Buffered platelet-rich plasma enhances mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2009; 15: 431–435.

95.

Vavken

Sadoghi

Palmer

et al.

Platelet-rich plasma reduces retear rates after arthroscopic repair of small- and medium-sized rotator cuff tears but is not cost-effective. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 3071–3076.

96.

Connell

Datir

Alyas

et al.

Treatment of lateral epicondylitis using skin-derived tenocyte-like cells. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 293–298.

97.

Gomes

JLE

da Silva

Silla

LMR

et al.

Conventional rotator cuff repair complemented by the aid of mononuclear autologous stem cells. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 20: 373–377.

98.

Hernigou

Flouzat Lachaniette

Delambre

et al.

Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff repair with mesenchymal stem cells during arthroscopy improves healing and prevents further tears: a case-controlled study. Int Orthop 2014; 38: 1811–1818.

99.

Ehirchiou

Kilts

et al.

Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their niche. Nat Med 2007; 13: 1219–1227.

100.

Tsai

C-C

Huang

T-F

H-L

et al.

Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from shoulder rotator cuff: a potential source for muscle and tendon repair. Cell Transplant 2013; 22: 413–422.

101.

Randelli

Conforti

Piccoli

et al.

Isolation and characterization of 2 new human rotator cuff and long head of biceps tendon cells possessing stem cell-like self-renewal and multipotential differentiation capacity. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 1653–1664.

102.

Mazzocca

McCarthy

MBR

Chowaniec

et al.

Rapid isolation of human stem cells (connective tissue progenitor cells) from the proximal humerus during arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 1438–1447.

103.

Beitzel

McCarthy

MBR

Cote

et al.

Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells (osteoprogenitors) harvested from proximal humerus and distal femur during arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 2013; 29: 301–308.

104.

Mazzocca

McCarthy

MBR

Chowaniec

et al.

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells obtained during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery show potential for tendon cell differentiation after treatment with insulin. Arthroscopy 2011; 27: 1459–1471.

105.

Centeno

Al-Sayegh

Freeman

et al.

A multi-center analysis of adverse events among two thousand, three hundred and seventy two adult patients undergoing adult autologous stem cell therapy for orthopaedic conditions. Int Orthop 2016; 40: 1755–1765.

106.

Hernigou P and Flouzat Lachaniette CH. Revision rotator cuff repair with mesenchymal stem cells decreases subsequent revision risk. In: Paper presented at AAOS 2016 annual meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 1 March 2016.

107.

Hernigou

Merouse

Duffiet

et al.

Reduced levels of mesenchymal stem cells at the tendon-bone interface tuberosity in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tear. Int Orthop 2015; 39: 1219–1225.

108.

Greenspoon

Moulton

Millett

et al.

The role of platelet rich plasma (PRP) and other biologics for rotator cuff repair. Open Orthop J 2016; 10: 309–314.