Hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty for unreconstructible distal humeral fractures in the elderly (hot elbow): A feasibility study

Abstract

This feasibility trial aims to assess the practicality of, and obtain preliminary data to inform, a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) versus distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients over the age of 65 years with unreconstructible distal humeral fractures (DHF). 17 patients met the inclusion criteria during the 18-month recruitment period from December 2020 until June 2022, and 15 (88%) consented to be randomised (recruitment rate: 0.7/month). Two patients withdrew from the study prior to surgery leaving 13 patients for analysis (retention rate: 87%). Seven patients were randomised to TEA and six patients to HA. 100% of patients were available for 12-month follow-up. A 10-point difference in favour of HA in DASH (44.5 vs. 54.2) and OES (31.6 vs. 21.3) was seen during 6-week follow-up, while no difference in patient-reported outcome measures was seen at 3- or 12-month follow-up. This study demonstrates feasibility of undertaking an RCT of TEA versus HA in patients over the age of 65 with unreconstructible DHF. Preliminary data corroborate with the ongoing clinical equipoise and support the requirement for a larger adequately powered RCT.

This trial is registered in the US Clinical Trials Registry (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04646798?cond=distal%20humeral%20fracture&rank=6) Clinical Trial ID: NCT04646798.

Keywords

distal humeral fractures total elbow arthroplasty distal humeral hemiarthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kim

Szabo

Marder

. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res 2012; 64: 407–414.

Palvanen

Kannus

Niemi

, et al. Secular trends in distal humeral fractures of elderly women nationwide statistics in Finland between 1970 and 2007. Bone 2010; 46: 1355–1358.

Burden

Batten

Smith

, et al. Hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged over 65 years: a systemic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and complications. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B: 559–566.

McKee

Veillette

CJH

Hall

, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction--internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 3–12.

Jong Seok

Sung Hyun

Kang

, et al. Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation with total elbow arthroplasty for intra-articular distal humeral fractures in older age: a retrospective study. Clin Shoulder Elb 2020; 23: 94–99.

Kholinne

Altamimi

Aldayel

, et al. Primary linked total elbow arthroplasty for acute distal humerus fracture management: a systematic review of clinical outcome. Clin Orthop Surg 2020; 12: 503–513.

Piggot

Hennessy

Aresti

. Distal humerus hemiarthroplasty for trauma: a systematic review of the outcomes and complications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31: 1545–1552.

Taylor

Page

Wheeler

, et al. Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty compared to total elbow replacement for distal humeral fractures: a registry analysis of 906 procedures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33: 356–365.

Burden

Evans

Smith

. Lifting limitations following elbow arthroplasty: a survey of British Elbow and Shoulder Society members. Shoulder Elbow 2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732231170292.

10.

Rangarajan

Papandrea

Cil

. Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty versus total elbow arthroplasty for acute distal humeral fractures. Orthopedics 2017; 40: 13–23.

11.

Zobitz

Morrey

. Biomechanics of the elbow. The elbow and its disorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Saunders, 2009.

12.

Brittain

Howard

Lawrence

, et al. NJR statistical analysis, support and associated services National Joint Registry | 19th Annual Report [Internet]. www.njrcentre.org.uk (accessed 30 November 2023)

13.

Kellam

Meinberg

Agel

, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium – 2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32: S1–S170.

14.

Jonsson

EÖ

Ekholm

Hallgren

, et al. Elbow hemiarthroplasty and total elbow arthroplasty provided a similar functional outcome for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged 60 years or older: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33: 343–355.

15.

Kwong

Neuburger

Black

. Agreement between retrospectively and contemporaneously collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hip and knee replacement patients. Qual Life Res 2018; 27: 1845–1854.

16.

Hay

Kulkarni

Watts

, et al. The provision of primary and revision elbow replacement surgery in the NHS. Shoulder Elbow 2018; 10: S5–S12.

17.

Wilfred

Akher

Horner

. Outcomes and complications of distal humeral hemiarthroplasty for distal humeral fractures – A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2022; 14: 65–74.

18.

Sanchez-Sotelo

. Total elbow arthroplasty. Open Orthop J 2011; 5: 115–123.

19.

Macken

Prkic

Kodde

, et al. Global trends in indications for total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of national registries. EFORT Open Rev 2020; 5: 215–220.

20.

Davey

Hurley

Gaafar

, et al. Long-term outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30: 1423–1430.

21.

Lordens

Den Hartog

Tuinebreijer

, et al. Minimal important change and other measurement properties of the Oxford elbow score and the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand in patients with a simple elbow dislocation; validation study alongside the multicenter FuncSiE trial. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0182557.

22.

Hung

M-C

W-S

Chen

S-S

, et al. Validation of the EQ-5D in patients with traumatic limb injury. Occup Rehabil 2015; 25: 387–393.

23.

Lami

Chivot

Caubere

, et al. First-line management of distal humerus fracture by total elbow arthroplasty in geriatric traumatology: results in a 21-patient series at a minimum 2 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103: 891–897.

24.

Parker

Furness

Evans

, et al. A systematic review of the complications of contemporary total elbow arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 2021; 13: 544–551.

25.

Makaram

Lee

Macdonald

, et al. The verbal Oxford knee score is not clinically different from the written score when assessed before or after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2020; 27: 1396–1405.

26.

Martin

Yaszemski

Ledonio

, et al.

Oswestry disability index: is telephone administration valid?

Iowa Orthop J 2019; 39: 92–94.

27.

London

Stepan

Boyer

, et al. Performance characteristics of the verbal QuickDASH. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39: 100–107.

28.

Frost

Reeve

Liepa

, et al.

What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures?

Value Health 2007; 10: S94–S105.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB