Benchmarking Economies of Vertical Integration in U.S. Electricity Supply: An Application of DEA

Abstract

This study applies a frontier benchmarking approach to measure economies of scope between the vertical stages of electricity supply in the U.S. electricity industry. By comparing different frontiers for integrated and separated supply of electricity based on a bootstrapping DEA, two types of vertical unbundling are analyzed. Separating the generation stage from networks and retail appears to be the more costly alternative with an average cost increase of 19 percent. Our second scenario, covering one of the options of transmission unbundling to be implemented in the European Union, shows an average cost increase below 2 percent.

Keywords

benchmarking economies of scope electricity industry vertical integration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allaz

and Villa

J.-L.

(1993) “Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency”, Journal of Economic Theory, 59: 1–16.

Arocena

(2008) “Cost and Quality Gains from Diversification and Vertical Integration in the Electricity Industry: A DEA Approach”, Energy Economics, 30: 39–58.

Arocena

Saal

and Coelli

(2009) Measuring Economies of Horizontal and Vertical Integration in the U.S. Electric Power Industry: How Costly is Unbundling? UK: Aston Business School. Working Paper RP 0917.

Baldick

and Kahn

(1993) “Network Costs and the Regulation of Wholesale Competition in Electric Power”, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 5: 367–384.

Baumol

Panzar

J.C.

and Willig

R.D.

(1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Javanovich.

Brunekreeft

Neuhoff

and Newbery

(2005) “Electricity Transmission: An Overview of the Current Debate”, Utilities Policy, 13: 73–93.

Brunekreeft

and Meyer

(2009) “Entflechtung auf den europäischen Strommärkten: Stand der Debatte”, In Knieps

and Weiß

H.-J.

(eds.), Fallstudien zur Netzökonomie. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Chao

Oren

and Wilson

(2005) Restructured Electricity Markets: Reevaluation of Vertical Integration and Unbundling. Palo Alto, California: EPRI. Technical paper.

Coelli

Rao

D.S.P.

O'Donnell

C. J.

and Battese

G.E.

(2005) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. New York: Springer Science & Business.

10.

Cummins

J.D.

Weiss

M.A.

and Zi

(2003) Economies of Scope in Financial Services: A DEA Bootstrapping Analysis of the US Insurance Industry. Unpublished manuscript, Philadelphia, PA: The Wharton School.

11.

European Commission (1996) Directive 96/92/EC, 1996, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996, Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Electricity. Brussels: European Commission.

12.

European Commission (2003) Directive 2003/54/EC, 2003, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003, Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Electricity and Repealing Directive 96/92/EC. Brussels: European Commission.

13.

European Commission (2007) DG Competition Report on Energy Sector Inquiry. Brussels: European Commission.

14.

European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Electricity and Repealing Directive 2003/54/EC. Brussels: European Commission.

15.

Efron

(1979) “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife”, Annals of Statistics, 7(1): 1–26.

16.

Ehlers

(2010) Electricity and Gas Supply Network Unbundling in Germany, Great Britain and the Netherlands and the Law of the European Union: A Comparison. Antwerp; Oxford; Portland: Intersentia.

17.

Färe

(1986) “Addition and Efficiency”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51: 861–865.

18.

Fraquelli

Piacenza

and Vannoni

(2005) “Cost Savings From Generation and Distribution with an Application to Italian Electric Utilities”, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 28(3): 289–308.

19.

Growitsch

and Wetzel

(2006) Economies of Scope in European Railways: An Efficiency Analysis. University of Lüneburg. Working Paper No. 29.

20.

Grosskopf

and Yaisawarng

(1990) “Economies of Scope in the Provision of Local Public Services”, National Tax Journal, 43(1): 61–74.

21.

Hart

(1995) Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Clarendon Lectures in Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

22.

Jara-Díaz

Ramos-Real

F.J.

and Martínez-Budría

(2004) “Economies of Integration in the Spanish Electricity Industry Using a Multistage Cost Function”, Energy Economics, 26: 995–1013.

23.

Jamasb

and Pollitt

(2001) “Benchmarking and Regulation: International Electricity Experience”, Utilities Policy, 9: 107–130.

24.

Jamasb

and Pollitt

(2003) “International Benchmarking and Regulation: An Application to European Electricity Distribution Utilities”, Energy Policy, 31: 1609–1622.

25.

Joskow

and Schmalensee

(1983). Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

26.

Kaserman

and Mayo

(1991). “The Measurement of Vertical Economies and the Efficient Structure of the Electric Utility Industry”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(5): 483–502.

27.

Kolbe

and Read

(1986) The Cost of Capital. Cambridge: MIT Press.

28.

Kunneke

(2008) “Institutional Reform and Technological Practice: The Case of Electricity”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2): 233–265.

29.

Künneke

and Fens

(2006) “Ownership Unbundling in Electricity Distribution: The Case of The Netherlands”, Energy Policy, 35(3): 1920–1930.

30.

Kwoka

J.E.

(2002) “Vertical Economies in Electric Power: Evidence on Integration and its Alternatives”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20: 653–671.

31.

Landon

J.H.

(1983) “Theories of Vertical Integration and their Application to the Electric Utility Industry”, The Antitrust Bulletin, 28: 101–130.

32.

Meyer

(2011a) Vertical Economies and the Costs of Separating Electricity Supply –A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Literature, Bremen Energy Working Paper No. 06, April 2011.

33.

Meyer

(2011b) “Economies of Scope in Electricity Supply and the Cost of Vertical Separation for Different Unbundling Scenarios”, forthcoming in Journal of Regulatory Economics.

34.

Nemoto

and Goto

(2004) “Technological Externalities and Economies of Vertical Integration in the Electricity Supply Industry”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22: 67–81.

35.

Newbery

and Pollitt

(1997) “The Restructuring and Privatisation of Britain's CEGB – Was it Worth it?”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(3): 269–303.

36.

Nillesen

and Pollitt

(2011) “Ownership Unbundling in Electricity Distribution: Empirical Evidence from New Zealand”, Review of Industrial Organization, 38(1): 61–93.

37.

Shephard

R.W.

(1970) Theory of Cost and Production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

38.

Simar

and Wilson

P.W.

(1998) “Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models”, Management Science 44(1): 49–61.

39.

Simar

and Wilson

P.W.

(2000) “Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art”, Journal of Productivity Analysis 13(1): 49–78.

40.

Willems

(2005) Cournot Competition, Financial Option Markets and Efficiency. University of California Energy Institute. CSEM Working Paper 139.

41.

Williamson

(1971) “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations”, American Economic Review, 61: 112.127.

42.

Williamson

(1975) Markets and Hierarchies; Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.

43.

Williamson

(1979) “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233–261.

44.

Wilson

P.W.

(1993) “Detecting Outliers in Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Multiple Outputs”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11: 319–323.

45.

Wilson

P.W.

(2005) Fear 1.0: A Software Package for Frontier Efficiency Analysis with R. Austin, Texas: University of Texas. Department of Economics, Unpublished working paper.