Aligning Technological and Institutional Change: Maritime Transport in the West Mediterranean Sea

Abstract

Within the area of study of infrastructure, various works have addressed the issue of the development of technological and institutional systems of network industries. In a dynamic perspective, issues arise about how technology and institutions co-evolve, what stimulates improvement of infrastructure performance, and how formal institutions should be designed in order to facilitate technological and institutional co-evolution. Building on the coherence framework for performance in network industries, this study aims to contribute to the development of an improved theory of technological and institutional change in network industries. The theoretical developments are illustrated through the case of technological and institutional changes of the maritime transport industry in the West Mediterranean Sea. The results suggest that more attention should be placed on the variety of private and public dimensions of performance of the network industry and by the mutual interaction between status quo conditions in the technological and institutional systems.

Keywords

maritime transport industry port reform technological and institutional coherence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Autoritá Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (1992) Indagine conoscitiva nel settore dei servizi portuali. Rome: AGCM.

Aspinwall

(1995) Moveable Feast: Pressure Group Conflict and the European Community Shipping Policy. Ashgate, UK: Aldershot.

Beretta

Vacche

Delle A.

and Migliardi

(2009) Il sistema portuale italiano: Un'indagine sui fattori di competitività e di sviluppo. Rome: Bank of Italy. Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers No. 39).

Chlomoudis

C.I.

and Pallis

A.A.

(2005) “The EU Port Policy in a Historical Perspective”, European Research Studies, 8(1): 21–42.

Chlomoudis

C.I.

and Pallis

A.A.

(2006) “EU Port Policy: A process of inexorable policy integration”, In Hatzioannou

M.C.

and Harlaftis

(eds), Following the Nereids: Sea Routes and maritime business, 16 ^th -20 ^th centuries. Athens: Kerkyra Publications, 155–163.

Coase

(2005) “The institutional structure of production”, In Ménard

and Shirley

(eds), Handbook of New Institutional Economics. New York: Springer, 31–65.

Cour des Comptes (2008) Rapport public thématique sur les ports français face aux mutations du transport maritime: L'urgence de l'action. Paris: Cour des Comptes.

Crettenand

(2011) “Pump-storage small hydropower as an example of coevolution between institutions and technologies”, 4^th Conference on Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Brussels.

Crettenand

Laperrouza

Finger

and Duthaler

(2010) Performance and coherence in network industries. Discussion paper series on the coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures, WP10–03.

10.

Cullinane

(2011) International Handbook of Maritime Business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

11.

Angeldonis

Defilippi E.F.

(2010) Access Regulation for Naturally Monopolistic Port Terminals: Lessons from Regulated Network Industries. PhD Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

12.

De Langen

P.W.

(2008) Ensuring Hinterland Access: The Role of Port Authorities. OECD-International Transport Forum Joint Research Centre, Discussion Paper 2008–11.

13.

De Rus

Román

and Trujillo

(1994) Actividad Económica y Estructura de Costes del Puerto de La Luz y de Las Palmas. Madrid: Ed. Cívitas.

14.

Dosi

(1982) “Technological paradigms and technological trajectories”, Research Policy, 11: 147–162.

15.

Dosi

and Nelson

R.R.

(1994) “An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4(3): 153–172.

16.

Duthaler

and Finger

(2010) The missing link between coherence and performance in network industries. Discussion paper series on the coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures, WP10–01.

17.

Economides

(1996) “The Economics of Networks”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14: 673–699.

18.

Estache

Gonzalez

and Trujillo

(2001) Technical efficiency gains from port reform: The potential for yardstick competition in Mexico. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2637.

19.

Estache

de la Fé

B.T.

and Trujillo

(2003) “Sources of efficiency gains in port reform: A DEA decomposition of a Malmquist TFP Index for Mexico”, Utilities Policy, 12(4): 221–230.

20.

EU (1977) Report of an Inquiry into the Current Situation in the Mayor Community Sea-Ports. EU Commission, port working group.

21.

EU (2006) Maritime Transport Policy: Improving the competitiveness, safety and security of European shipping. Belgium: EU Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport.

22.

Eurostat (2011) Quarterly and annual data based on Council Directive 95/64/EC. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/transport/data/database.

23.

Finger

and Künneke

(2006) “The need for coherence between institutions and technology in liberalized infrastructures: The case of network unbundling in electricity and railways”, Paper presented at the 5^th Conference on Applied Infrastructure Research, Berlin, 6–7 October.

24.

Finger

and Künneke

(2007) “The coevolution between institutions and technology in liberalized infrastructures: The case of network unbundling in electricity and railways”, The International Society for New Institutional Economics, Reykjavik, Iceland.

25.

Finger

and Künneke

(2009) Exploring socio-technical governance regimes in liberalizing network industries. Discussion paper series on the coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures, WP09–01.

26.

Finger

Groenewegen

and Künneke

(2005) “The quest for coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures”, Journal of Network Industries, 6(4): 227–259.

27.

Finger

Crettenand

Laperrouza

and Künneke

(2010) Governing the dynamics of the network industries. Discussion paper series on the coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures, WP10–02.

28.

Geels

(2004) “From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory”, Research Policy, 33: 897–920.

29.

Gibbons

and Gwin

(1985) “Technology and Governance”, Technology in Society, 7: 333–352.

30.

Glachant

J.-M.

and Finon

(1999) Why Do European Union's Electricity Industries Continue to Differ? A New Institutional Analysis. ADIS Working Paper, No 1999-01.

31.

Göttinger

H.W.

(2003) Economies of Network Industries. London: Routledge.

32.

Jonker

(2010) Modernization of Electricity Networks: Exploring the Interrelations between Institutions and Technology. PhD disseration at the Technische Universiteit Delft. Delft, the Netherlands: Next Generation Infrastructures Foundation.

33.

Karlsson

Anderson

W.P.

Johansson

and Kobayashi

(2007) The Management and Measurement of Infrastructure: Performance, Efficiency and Innovation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

34.

Kessides

(2004) Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation and Competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

35.

Künneke

R.W.

(2008) “Institutional reform and technological practice: The case of electricity”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2): 233–265.

36.

Künneke

R.W.

and Finger

(2007) “Technology matters: The cases of the liberalization of the electricity and railways”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 8(3): 303–335.

37.

Künneke

R.W.

Groenewegen

and Ménard

(2008) Aligning institutions with technology: Critical transactions in the reform of infrastructures. Working Paper, TU Delft.

38.

Ménard

(2005), “A new institutional approach to organization”, In Ménard

and Shirley

(eds), Handbook of New Institutional Economics. New York: Springer, 281–318.

39.

Nelson

and Winter

(1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Boston: Harvard University Press.

40.

Newberry

(2001) Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulation of Network Industries. Cambridge: MIT Press.

41.

Nightingale

Brady

Davies

and Hall

(2003) “Capacity utilization revisited: Software, control and the growth of large technical systems”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(3): 477–517.

42.

Pallis

A.A.

(2002) The Common EU Maritime Transport Policy. Ashgate, UK: Aldershot.

43.

Pallis

A.A.

(2007) “Whither Port Strategy? Theory and Practice in Conflict”, In Pallis

A.A.

(ed), Maritime Transport: The Greek Paradigm, Research in Transportation Economics, No. 21, Elsevier: London, 345–386.

44.

Pallis

A.A.

and Tsiotis

G.-S.P.

(2008) “Maritime interests and the EU port services directive”, European Transport, 38: 17–31.

45.

Pallis

A.A.

and Vaggelas

G.K.

(2005) “Port Competitiveness and the EU ‘Port Services’ Directive: The Case of Greek Ports”, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 7(2): 116–140.

46.

Robinson

(2002) “Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm”, Maritime Policy and Management, 29(3): 241–55.

47.

Scholten

(2009) The role of coherence in the coevolution between institutions and technologies, Discussion paper series on the coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures, WP09–03.

48.

Schumpeter

J.A.

(1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.

49.

Tongzon

and Heng

(2005) “Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals)”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(5): 405–424.

50.

Trujillo

and Nombela

(2002) “Seaports”, In Estache

and de Rus

(eds), Privatization and Regulation of Transport Infrastructure. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 113–170.

51.

Williamson

(1975) Markets and Hierarchies. Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications. New York: Free Press.

52.

Williamson

(1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.