2012 Framework on Public Compensation for SGEIs: Application in the Postal Sector

Abstract

The legal rules applicable to State compensation for services of general economic interest (“SGEIs”) were recently revised by the European Commission. This led to the adoption of the “2012 SGEI Package”. The most contentious document of this Package, the “2012 Framework”, sets out the conditions for the compatibility of SGEI compensation with the internal market. Against this background, the Commission has recently shown an increased interest in the application of the State aid rules to the postal sector and seems determined to continue scrutinizing the sector in the future. This article aims to analyse the specific rules of the Framework and look closer at the way they (could) apply to the postal sector, with references to the decisional practice of the Commission.

Keywords

compensation public services services of general economic interest State aid

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sierra

J.L. Buendia

(2008) “Finding the Right Balance: State Aid and Services of General Economic Interest”, EC State aid Law: Liber Amicorum in Honour Francisco Santaolalla. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwerlaw.

Bulow

and Klemperer

(2002) “Prices and the Winner's Curse”, Rand Journal of Economics, 33(1): 1.

Crew

and Kleindorfer

(2005) “Competition, Universal Service and the Graveyard Spiral”, In Crew

and Kleindorfer

(eds), Regulatory and Economic Challenges in the Postal and Delivery Sector, Cheltenham/ Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Fiedziuk

(2011) “Services of general economic interest and the Treaty of Lisbon: Opening doors to a whole new approach or maintaining the status quo?”, ELRev, 36(2): 226.

Geradin

and Girgenson

(2011) “The Counterfactual Method in EU Competition Law: The Cornerstone of the Effects-Based Approach”, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1970917.

Hong

and Shum

(2004) “Increasing Competition and the Winner's Curse: Evidence from procurement”, Review of Economic Studies, 69: 879.

Jaag

Koller

and Trinkner

(2009) “Calculating the cost of the Universal Service Obligation: The need for a global approach”, In Crew

and Kleindorfer

(eds), Progress in the Competitive Agenda in the Postal and Delivery Sector. Cheltenham/ Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Klemperer

(2002) “What really matters in Auction design”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 16(1): 169.

Klemperer

(2004) Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

10.

Mägli

Jaag

Koller

and Trinkner

(2011) “Postal Markets and Electronic Substitution: Implications for Regulatory Practices and Institutions in Europe”, In Crew

and Kleindorfer

(eds), Reinventing the Postal Sector in an Electronic Age. Cheltenham/ Northampton: Edward Elgar.

11.

Milgrom

and Weber

(1982) “A theory of auctions and competitive bidding”, Econometrica, 50(5): 1089.

12.

Panzar

(2000) “A Methodology for Measuring the Costs of Universal Service Obligations”, Information Economics and Policy, 12(3): 211.

13.

Santamato

and Pesaresi

(2004) “Compensation for services of general economic interest: Some thoughts on the Altmark ruling”, Competition Policy Newsletter, (1): 17.

14.

Schweitzer

(2011) “Services of General Economic Interest: European Law's Impact on the Role of Markets and of Member States”, In Cremona

(ed.), Market Integration and Public Services in the European Union. Oxford: OUP.

15.

Wernicke

(2009) “Taking Stock: The EU Institutions and Services of General Economic Interest”, In Krajewski

Neergaard

and Van De Gronden

(eds), The Changing Legal Framework for Services of General Interest in Europe: Between Competition and Solidarity. The Hague: TMC Asser.