The influence of organisational factors on the quality of hospital coding using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems, 10th Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) was investigated using a mixed quantitative-qualitative approach. The organisational variables studied were: hospital specialty; geographical locality; structural characteristics of the coding unit; education, training and resource supports for Clinical Coders; and quality control mechanisms. Baseline data on the hospitals' coding quality, measured by the Performance Indicators for Coding Quality tool, were used as an independent index measure. No differences were found in error rates between rural and metropolitan hospitals, or general and specialist hospitals. Clinical Coder allocation to ‘general’ rather than ‘specialist’ unit coding resulted in fewer errors. Coding Managers reported that coding quality can be improved by: Coders engaging in a variety of role behaviours; improved Coder career opportunities; higher staffing levels; reduced throughput; fewer time constraints on coding outputs and associated work; and increased Coder interactions with medical staff.
American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA). (2001). Developing a coding compliance policy document (AHIMA Practice Brief). Journal of the American Health Information Management Association72(7): 88A–C.
2.
BerthelsenC.L. (2000). Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUPO National Inpatient Sample. Topics in Health Information Management21(2): 10–23.
3.
CallenJ.RustJ.HinesB.RobertsonL.KillenJ. (1998). Is coding in theatres a viable option? A review of the current theatre coding process at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. Journal of the Australian Confederation of Operating Room Nurses (ACORN)11(2): 34–38.
4.
DemloL.K.CampbellP.M. (1981). Improving hospital discharge data: Lessons from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Medical Care19(1): 1030–1040.
5.
DenzinN. (1978). The research art. Chicago: Aldine.
6.
FenigS.LevavI.KohnR.YelinN. (1993). Telephone vs face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey. American Journal of Public Health83 (6): 896–898.
7.
FletcherR. (2002). The importance of addressing inaccurate Diagnosis Related Group assignment as a risk area. Journal of Health Care Compliance4(5): 40–46.
8.
FlickU. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative?Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour22: 175–197.
9.
FloodA.B. (1994). The impact of organizational and managerial factors on the quality of care in health care organizations. Medical Care Review51(4): 381–428.
10.
GreenE.BenjaminC. (1986). Impact of the medical record credential on data quality. Journal of the American Medical Record Association67: 29–38.
11.
GroomA. (2000). Congratulations! You've passed the coding course. Paper presented at the International Federation of Health Records Organizations Congress, Melbourne, Victoria. October 2000. Re-printed in ICD Coding Newsletter (November 2000), Melbourne: Victorian ICD Coding Committee and Victorian Department of Human Services: 97–106.
12.
HasanM.MearaR.J.BhowmickB.K. (1995). The quality of diagnostic coding in cerebrovascular disease. International Journal for Quality in Health Care7(4): 407–410.
13.
HsiaD.AhernC.RitchieB.MoscoeL.KrushatM. (1992). Medicare reimbursement accuracy under the Prospective Payment System, 1985–1988. Journal of the American Medical Association268(7): 896–899.
14.
KempT. (1994). A profile of ICD-9-CM coding staff in NSW and ACT hospitals. Health Information Management Journal24(3): 94–100.
15.
LorenceD.P.IbrahimI.A. (2003). Benchmarking variation in coding accuracy across the United States. Journal of Health Care Finance29(4): 29–43.
16.
LorenceD.P.SpinkA.JamesonR. (2002). Manager's reports on variation in coding accuracy across U.S. oncology centers. The Journal of Oncology Management11(6): 20–26.
17.
LumsdenJ. (1971). Elementary statistical method. Perth, Western Australia: University of Western Australia Press.
18.
MacIntyreR.C.AcklandM.J.ChandrarajE.J. (1997). Accuracy of injury coding in Victorian hospital morbidity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health21(7): 779–783.
19.
McBurneyD.H. (1994). Research methods, 3rd edn. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
20.
McKenzieK.WalkerS. (2003). The Australian Coder Workforce 2002: A report of the National Clinical Coder Survey. Lidcombe, New South Wales: National Centre for Classification in Health.
21.
MearsS.C.BawaM.PietryakP.JonesL.C.RajadhyakshaA.D.HungerfordD.S.MontM.A. (2002). Coding of diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications of total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research1(402): 164–170.
22.
MehanniM.LoughmanE.AllwrightS.P.PrichardJ. (1995). The hospital in-patient enquiry scheme: A study of data accuracy and capture. Irish Medical Journal88(1): 24–26.
23.
Murphy-MuthS.M. (1987). Medical records: Management in a changing environment. Rockville, MD. Aspen Publications.
24.
NunnallyJ.C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
ObsornC.E. (1999). Benchmarking with national ICD-9-CM coded data. Journal of the American Health Information Management Association70(3): 59–69.
26.
ProphetS. (2001). Developing a physician query process (AHIMA Practice Brief). Journal of the American Health Information Management Association9:881–M.
27.
SiegelS. (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGrawHill.
28.
StevensS.UnwinE.C.CoddeJ.P. (1998). A review of hospital medical record audits: Implications for funding and training. Australian Health Review21(3): 78–91.
29.
SurjanG. (1999). Questions on validity of International Classification of Diseases-coded diagnoses. International Journal of Medical Informatics54(2): 77–95.
30.
TalbotW. (1995). An introduction to casemix development in Australia. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Casemix Development Program, Department of Human Services and Health.
31.
The National Centre for Classification in Health (NCCH). (2003). Performance Indicators for Coding Quality (PICQ) 2002 user guide. Sydney, Australia: NCCH.
32.
ThompsonN.S.KochD. (1999). Ongoing coding review: Ways to ensure quality. Journal of the American Health Information Management Association70(1): 45–49.
33.
WallerG.WattsS. (2002). Quality activities for morbidity and mortality coding. Paper presented at the Meeting of Heads of World Health Organization Collaboration Centers for the Classification of Diseases, Brisbane, Queensland (unpublished).
34.
WaterstraatF.L. (1990). Diagnostic coding quality and its impact on healthcare reimbursement: Research perspectives. Journal of the American Medical Record Association61(9): 52–59.
35.
WendlerM.W.SlovenskyD. (1987). Effects of the Prospective Payment System on medical record coding. Journal of the American Medical Record Association58(7): 13–17.
