Electronic medical records (EMRs) have the potential to improve and streamline the quality and safety of patient care. Harnessing the full benefits of EMR implementation depends on the utilisation of advanced features, defined as “mature usage.” At present, little is known about the maturity of EMR usage by allied health professionals (AHPs).
Objective:
To examine current maturity of EMR use by AHPs and explore perceived barriers to mature EMR utilisation and optimisation.
Method:
AHPs were recruited from three health services. Participants completed a 27-question electronic questionnaire based on the EMR Adoption Framework, which measures clinician EMR utilisation (0 = paper chart, 5 = theoretical maximum) across 10 EMR feature categories. Interviews were conducted with both clinicians and managers to explore the nature of current EMR utilisation and perceived facilitators and barriers to mature usage.
Results:
Questionnaire responses were obtained from 193 participants AHPs. The majority of questions (74%) showed a mean score of <3, indicating a lack of mature EMR use. Pockets of mature usage were identified in the categories of health information, referrals and administration processes. Interviews with 21 clinicians and managers revealed barriers to optimisation across three themes: (1) limited understanding of EMR opportunities; (2) complexity of the EMR change process and (3) end-user and environmental factors.
Conclusion:
Mature usage across EMR feature categories of the EMR Adoption Framework was low. However, questionnaire and qualitative interview data suggested pockets of mature utilisation.
Implications:
Achieving mature allied health EMR use will require strategies implemented at the clinician, EMR support, and service levels.
BoonstraABroekhuisM (2010) Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Services Research10(1): 1–17.
5.
BradshawCAtkinsonSDoodyO (2017) Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research4: 1–8.
6.
DoyleLMcCabeCKeoghB, et al. (2020) An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing25(5): 443–455.
GhazisaeediMMohammadzadehNSafdariR (2014) Electronic health record (EHR) as a vehicle for successful health care best practice. Medical Archives68(6): 419.
9.
GreenLAPotworowskiGDayA, et al. (2015) Sustaining “meaningful use” of health information technology in low-resource practices. The Annals of Family Medicine13(1): 17–22.
10.
GriesserABidmonS (2023) A holistic view of facilitators and barriers of electronic health records usage from different perspectives: A qualitative content analysis approach. Health Information Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 7 July 2023. DOI: 10.1177/18333583231178611.
11.
JonesMKozielCLarsenD, et al. (2017) Progress in the enhanced use of electronic medical records: Data from the Ontario experience. JMIR Medical Informatics5(1): e6928.
12.
JulinaJKJThenmozhiD (2012) Ontology based EMR for decision making in health care using SNOMED CT. In: 2012 International conference on recent trends in information technology, Chennai, 19–21 April 2012, pp. 514–519. IEEE.
13.
KemperARUrenRLClarkSJ (2006) Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices. Pediatrics118(1): e20–e24.
14.
KeshavjeeKWilliamsonTMartinK, et al. (2014) Getting to usable EMR data. Canadian Family Physician60(4): 392–392.
15.
KristiansonKJLjunggrenHGustafssonLL (2009) Data extraction from a semi-structured electronic medical record system for outpatients: A model to facilitate the access and use of data for quality control and research. Health Informatics Journal15(4): 305–319.
16.
LloydSLongKProbstY, et al. (2023) Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis. Health Information Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 3 March 2023. DOI: 10.1177/18333583231154624.
17.
McCamleyJVivantiAEdirippuligeS (2019) Dietetics in the digital age: The impact of an electronic medical record on a tertiary hospital dietetic department. Nutrition & Dietetics76(4): 480–485.
18.
McLachlanGBroomfieldAElliottR (2021) Completeness and accuracy of adverse drug reaction documentation in electronic medical records at a tertiary care hospital in Australia. Health Information Management Journal 52(2): 108–111.
19.
MeadeBBuckleyDBolandM (2009) What factors affect the use of electronic patient records by Irish GPs?International Journal of Medical Informatics78(8): 551–558.
MoonMCHillsRDemirisG (2018) Understanding optimisation processes of electronic health records (EHRs) in select leading hospitals: A qualitative study. BMJ Health & Care Informatics25(2): 109–125.
OtterAI (2022) Otter AI. Available at: https://otter.ai/home (accessed 3 January 2022).
24.
ParéGRaymondLde GuineaAO, et al. (2014) Barriers to organizational adoption of EMR systems in family physician practices: A mixed-methods study in Canada. International Journal of Medical Informatics83(8): 548–558.
25.
ParkY-TKimYSYiB-K, et al. (2019) Clinical decision support functions and digitalization of clinical documents of electronic medical record systems. Healthcare Informatics Research25(2): 115–123.
26.
PriceMSingerAKimJ (2013) Adopting electronic medical records: Are they just electronic paper records?Canadian Family Physician59(7): e322–e329.
27.
RahalRMMercerJKuziemskyC, et al. (2021) Factors affecting the mature use of electronic medical records by primary care physicians: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making21(1): 1–15.
28.
RandhawaGKShachakACourtneyKL, et al. (2019) Evaluating a post-implementation electronic medical record training intervention for diabetes management in primary care. BMJ Health & Care Informatics26(1): e100086.
29.
SchnipperJLLinderJAPalchukMB, et al. (2008) “Smart Forms” in an electronic medical record: Documentation-based clinical decision support to improve disease management. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association15(4): 513–523.
30.
SchwarzMWardECCoccettiA, et al. (2022) Digital dashboards: A speech pathology case study. Australian Health Review46(4): 501–508.
31.
SheaCMMaloneRWeinbergerM, et al. (2014) Assessing organizational capacity for achieving meaningful use of electronic health records. Health Care Management Review39(2): 124.
32.
SimonSRKaushalRClearyPD, et al. (2007) Physicians and electronic health records: A statewide survey. Archives of Internal Medicine167(5): 507–512.
SuttonRTPincockDBaumgartDC, et al. (2020) An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine3(1): 1–10.
35.
TolarMBalkaE (2011) Beyond individual patient care: Enhanced use of EMR data in a primary care setting. ITCH2011: 143–147.
36.
TuKWiddifieldJYoungJ, et al. (2015) Are family physicians comprehensively using electronic medical records such that the data can be used for secondary purposes? A Canadian perspective. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making15(1): 1–12.
37.
UsluAStausbergJ (2021) Value of the electronic medical record for hospital care: Update from the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(12): e26323.
38.
VishwanathAScamurraSD (2007) Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: Using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model. Health Informatics Journal13(2): 119–134.
