A Fine Balance: Understanding the Roles Educators and Children Play as Intentional Teachers and Intentional Learners within the Early Years Learning Framework
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2013
A Fine Balance: Understanding the Roles Educators and Children Play as Intentional Teachers and Intentional Learners within the Early Years Learning Framework
THE AUSTRALIAN EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK (EYLF) has foregrounded intentional teaching as one aspect of its first national curriculum, thus sparking a debate about the relationship of play-based learning and the role of the early childhood educator. This paper draws upon current research with early childhood practitioners and their emerging identities as intentional teachers. Central to practitioners' struggles is navigating relationships between intentionality, required documentation in the form of outcomes, and the different approaches encountered during outdoor and indoor environments. This paper analyses tensions between the construction of curriculum and the role of educators. It argues that a focus on intentional learning, as well as intentional teaching, will create a more effective treatment of the teaching/learning nexus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college.Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from http://www.greaterexpectations.org/.
2.
BackerB. (1998). Child-centered teaching, redemptions, and educational identities: A history of the present. Educational Theory, 48(2), 155–175.
3.
BereitzerC., & ScardamaliaM. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glasser. In ResnickL. (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 361–392). London: Routledge.
4.
BoudahD. J. (2011). Conducting educational research: Guide to completing a major project.London: SAGE.
5.
BroadheadP. (2004). Supporting children's learning in the early years (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
6.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis.London: Sage.
8.
ChungS., & WalshD. J. (2000). Unpacking a child-centeredness: A history of meanings. Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 215–234.
9.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.ACT: Council of Australian Governments: Commonwealth of Australia.
10.
DeweyJ. (1963/1938). Experience and education (Vol. original work published 1938). New York: Collier Books.
11.
DeweyJ. (1990/1902). The school and society and The child and the curriculum. Combined edition (Vol. original work published 1902). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
12.
DreyfusH., & DreyfusS. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer.New York: The Free Press.
13.
EdwardsC., GandiniL., & FormanG. (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach-advanced reflections.Connecticut: Ablex Publishing.
14.
EdwardsS., & Cutter-MackenzieA. (2011). Environmentalising early childhood education curriculum through pedagogies of play. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(1), 51–59.
15.
EpsteinA. (2007). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children's learning.Washington DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
16.
FenechM., & SumsionJ. (2007). Early childhood teachers and regulation: Complicating power relations using a Foucauldian lens. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(2), 109–122.
17.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making social science matter.New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FoucaultM. (1994). Power.New York: The New Press.
19.
GandiniL. (1993). Fundamentals of the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Young Children, 49(1), 4–18.
20.
GianoutsosJ. (2006). Locke and Rousseau: Early childhood education. The Pulse, 4(1).
21.
GoswamiU. (2004). Neoroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2004(74), 1–14.
22.
GrieshaberS. (2008). Interrupting stereotypes: Teaching and the education of young children. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 505-518.
23.
HiemstraR. (1994). Resistance to self-direction in adult learning: Myths and misunderstandings. In HiemstraR. & BrockettR. (Eds.), Overcoming resistance to self-direction in adult learning (pp. 5—). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
LempertL. (2007). Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In BryantA. & CharmazK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Athens, OH, USA: Sage.
25.
LumpkinA. (2008). Teachers as role models teaching character and moral virtues. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 79(2), 45–49.
26.
MalaguzziL. (1998). History, ideas, and basic philosophy: An interview with Lella Gandini. In EdwardsC., GandiniL. & FormanG. (Eds.), The hundred languages of children. The Reggio Emilia Approach-Advanced reflections.Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
27.
McArdleF., & McWilliamE. (2005). From balance to blasphemy: Shifting metaphors for researching early childhood education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 323–336.
28.
McNiffJ., & WhiteheadJ. (2006). All you need to know about action research.London: Sage.
29.
MeadeA. (2000). If you say it three times, is it three? Critical use of research in early childhood education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 8(1), 15–27.
30.
MillsS. (2003). Michel Foucault.London: Routledge.
31.
Ministry of Education (NZ). (1996). Te Whāriki: He Whāriki Mōtauranga mō ngā Mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum.Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
32.
MorganD. L. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
NutbrownC. (1996). Children's rights in early education.London: Paul Chapman.
34.
OrmrodJ. E. (2006). Essentials of educational psychology.Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
35.
PiagetJ. (1971). The theory of the stages in cognitive development. In MussenP. (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley.
36.
Pramling SamuelssonI., & Asplund CarlssonM. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 623–641.
37.
RankinB. (2004). The importance of intentional socialisation among children in small groups: A conversation with Loris Malaguzzi. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(2), 81–85.
38.
RinaldiC. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning.London: Routledge.
39.
RinaldiC. (2008). Teachers as researchers: Students and professors workshops.Italy: Reggio Emilia.
40.
RoddJ. (1994). Leadership in early childhood education: The pathway to professionalism. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
41.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context.New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
SandbergA., & Arlemalm-HagserE. (2011). The Swedish National Curriculum: Play and learning with fundamental values in focus. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(1), 44–50.
43.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44.
SpriggsM., & GillamL. (2008). Consent in paediatric research: An evaluation of the guidance provided in the 2007 NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Medical Journal of Australia, 188(6), 360–362.
45.
SternW. (1924). Psychology of early childhood up to the sixth year of age.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
46.
StraussA. L., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research.London: Sage.
47.
StraussA. L., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
48.
StraussS. (2003). Teaching as a natural cognition and its implications for teacher education. In PillemerD. & WhiteS. (Eds.), Developmental psychology and the social changes of our time.New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
StraussS., ZivM., & SteinA. (2002). Teaching as a natural cognition and its relations to preschoolers' developing theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 17, 1473–1787.
50.
ThomasL., WarrenE., & de VriesE. (2011). Play-based learning and intentional teaching in early childhood contexts. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(4), 69–75.
51.
TzuoP. (2007). The tension between teacher control and children's freedom in a child-centered classroom: Resolving the practical dilemma through a closer look at the related theories. Early Childhood Educational Journal, 35(1), 33–39.
