Multiplicities in early childhood reform engagement in Victorian long day care centres: Discourse,position and practice

Abstract

Change is not a new concept in the Australian early childhood sector. However, the rate of change has significantly increased throughout the last decade, specifically with the introduction of the curriculum and quality frameworks, changes to regulations, and subsequent reviews (some particularly affecting the Victorian long day care sector). The rapid timeline of these reforms created challenges for early childhood professionals who needed to understand, interpret and translate multiple changes to their practice. This paper presents some key findings from a poststructural study involving 11 participants from the Victorian long day care sector. Foucauldian Discourse Analysis has been applied to explore how reform discourses shape and reshape the positioning and engagement of professionals within the reform process. These findings reveal how specific subject positions and discursive practices within available discourses of knowledge, teacher education and workplace can either challenge and/or support early childhood professionals in their ability to engage in reform.

Keywords

Foucauldian discourse analysis early childhood learning discourse reform engagement positions and practices teacher education discourse Victorian long day care workplace discourse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arribas-Ayllon

Walkerdine

(2017). Foucauldian discourse analysis. In Willig

Stainton-Rogers

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 110–123). London, UK: SAGE.

Arthur

Beecher

Death

Dockett

Farmer

(2018). Programming and planning in early childhood settings (7th ed.). South Melbourne, Vic, Australia: Cengage Learning Australia.

Australian Children’s Education & Care Quality Authority [ACECQA]. (2012). National Quality Framework. Retrieved 7 September 2014 from http://acecqa.gov.au/national-quality-framework/the-national-quality-standard.

Australian Children’s Education & Care Quality Authority [ACECQA]. (2017). Annual report 2016–2017. Retrieved 2 January 2018 from http://files.acecqa.gov.au/files/Annual%20Report/ACECQA-AnnualReport-20162017.pdf.

Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian qualifications framework. South Australia: Australian Qualifications Framework Council.

Brennan

(1998). The politics of Australian child care: From philanthropy to feminism and beyond (rev.). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

Bryman

(2012). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Copple

Bredekamp

(Eds.). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs: Serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Creswell

J. W.

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

10.

Department of Education & Early Childhood Development & Victorian Curriculum & Assessment Authority [DEECD & VCAA]. (2009). Victorian early years learning and development framework: For all children from birth to eight years. East Melbourne, Vic, Australia: Early Childhood Strategy Division.

11.

Department of Education, Employment & Workplace Relations [DEEWR]. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Barton, Act, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.

12.

Department of Education, Employment & Workplace Relations [DEEWR]. (2011). Final report: Baseline evaluation of the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF). Melbourne, Australia: Monash University Education.

13.

Department of Education & Training [DET]. (2016). Victorian early years learning and development framework: For all children from birth to eight years. East Melbourne, Vic, Australia: Department of Education & Training.

14.

Edwards

Fleer

Nuttall

(2008). A research paper to inform the development of an early years learning framework for Australia – June 2008. East Melbourne, Vic, Australia: Office for Children and Early Childhood Development & Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Retrieved 10 August 2018 from http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/earlyyears/researchpaperdevelopearlylearnfw.pdf.

15.

Fielding

Lee

R. M.

Blank

(2008). The SAGE handbook of online research methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

16.

Foucault

(1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (1st American ed.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

17.

Garvis

Pendergast

Twigg

Fluckiger

Kanasa

(2012). Evaluation of the implementation of the Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework: For all children from birth to eight years. Early childhood professionals’ perceptions of implementation activities and resources 2010–2011. Final Report. Melbourne, Vic, Australia: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

18.

Gomez

R. E.

(2012). Resistance, reproduction, both, or neither: Exploring the influence of early childhood professional development specialists on the field of early childhood education. NHSA Dialog, 15(1), 81–94. doi:10.1080/15240754.2011.636487.

19.

Gorrell

Hoover

(2009). The coaching connection: A manager’s guide to developing individual potential in the context of the organization. New York, NY: American Management Association.

20.

Gronlund

James

(2008). Early learning standards and staff development: Best practices in the face of change. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.

21.

Hiatt

J. M.

(2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Loveland, CO: Prosci Learning Center Publications.

22.

Kendall

Wickham

(1999). Using Foucault’s methods. London, UK: SAGE.

23.

Kilderry

Nolan

Scott

(2017). ‘Out of the loop’: Early childhood educators gaining confidence with unfamiliar policy discourse. Early Years, 37(4), 341–354. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2016.1183595.

24.

Krieg

(2010). The professional knowledge that counts in Australian contemporary early childhood teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(2), 144–155. doi:10.2304/ciec.2010.11.2.144.

25.

Mac Naughton

Siraj-Blatchford

Rolfe

S. A.

(Eds.). (2010). Doing early childhood research: International perspectives on theory & practice. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

26.

Melbourne Graduate School of Education [MGSE]. (2016). The E4Kids study: Assessing the effectiveness of Australian early childhood education and care programs – Overview of findings at 2016. Melbourne, Vic, Australia: MGSE. Retrieved 12 May 2018 from http://education.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/2310907/E4Kids-Report-3.0_WEB.pdf.

27.

Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development & Youth Affairs [MCEECDYA]. (2011). Education and care services national regulations. Canberra, Act, Australia: Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs. Retrieved 7 August 2014 from https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/regulations/2011–653.pdf.

28.

Moore

T. G.

(2008). Towards an early years learning framework for Australia. CCCH Working Paper 4 (August 2008). Parkville, Vic, Australia: Centre for Community Child Health.

29.

Nailon

(2013). Researching ECEC professional development: Using Kelly’s repertory grid to examine changes in educators’ constructs about curriculum design in early childhood settings. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(1), 81–88.

30.

Nuttall

Grieshaber

(2018). The historical emergence of early childhood education research in Australia. In Fleer

van Oers

(Eds.), International handbook of early childhood education (pp. 511–530). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer International Handbooks of Education.

31.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development [OECD]. (2017). Starting strong 2017: Key OECD indicators on early childhood education and care. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 23 July 2018 from https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1787/9789264276116-en.

32.

Pendergast

(2006). Fast-tracking middle schooling reform: A model for sustainability. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 6(2), 13–18.

33.

Prado

C. G.

(2000). Starting with Foucault: An introduction to genealogy (2nd ed.). Boulder, Co: Westview Press.

34.

Press

(2015). The Australian early childhood education and care workforce: Feminism, feminisation and fragmentation. In Campbell-Barr

Georgeson

(Eds.), International perspectives on workforce development in early childhood education and care: History, philosophy and politics (pp. 69–82). Northwich, UK: Critical Publishing.

35.

Robins

(2015). Doing social network research: Network-based research design for social scientists. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

36.

Scantlebury Brown

Campbell

Wilmot

A. E.

(1966). A guide to the care of the young child (6th ed.). Melbourne: Department of Health, Victoria.

37.

Sims

(2006). Early childhood educators: ‘drivers of social change’. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(4), ii. Retrieved on 27 May 2018 from http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A155024266/AONE?u=monash&sid=AONE&xid=1f64bbac.

38.

Sumsion

Barnes

Cheeseman

Harrison

Kennedy

Stonehouse

(2009). Insider perspectives on developing belonging, being & becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 4.

39.

Twigg

Pendergast

Fluckiger

Garvis

Johnson

Robertson

(2013). Coaching for early childhood educators: An insight into the effectiveness of an initiative. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 73–90. doi: 10.4225/03/5817dfc8b9ad8

40.

VCAA. (2015). VEYLDF Review and Update: Report on consultations findings – December 2015. Melbourne, Vic, Australia: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

41.

Willig

(2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.