Consumers are increasingly interested in environmental issues, which have raised their expectations of firms’ environmentally conscious efforts. The purpose of this study is to investigate how green messages in advertisements conveying a firm’s commitment to the environment can effectively influence consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions. Furthermore, this study examines the psychological mechanism underlying such an effect. The results of two studies show that firms’ eco-friendly efforts as revealed in advertisements for luxury products generated favorable attitudes in consumers and increased their behavioral intentions more than firms’ eco-friendly efforts as revealed in advertisements for mass products. This process was driven by trust in the ad message, especially for consumers of luxury brands and who are not confused by green message. This research provides empirical evidence that green ads presenting a firm’s commitment to the environment can effectively influence consumers when brands are used to promote eco-friendly products in luxury markets.
AakerJ. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356.
2.
AakerJ. L.GarbinskyE. N.VohsK. D. (2012). Cultivating admiration in brands: Warmth, competence, and landing in the “golden quadrant.”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 191–194.
AmatulliC.De AngelisM.PelusoA. M.SosciaI.GuidoG. (2019). The effect of negative message framing on green consumption: An investigation of the role of shame. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 1111–1132.
5.
ArielyD.BrachaA.MeierS. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99(1), 544–555.
6.
AthwalN.WellsV. K.CarriganM.HenningerC. E. (2019). Sustainable luxury marketing: A synthesis and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(4), 405–426.
7.
AtikD.FıratA. F. (2013). Fashion creation and diffusion: The institution of marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(7–8), 836–860.
8.
BirtwistleG.MooreC. M. (2007). Fashion clothing–where does it all end up?International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(3), 210–216.
9.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.CastelliniF.RivaP. (2010). The effects of status on perceived warmth and competence. Social Psychology, 41(2), 82–87.
10.
BrekkeK. A.KverndokkS.NyborgK. (2003). An economic model of moral motivation. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9–10), 1967–1983.
11.
BruceM.DalyL. (2006). Buyer behaviour for fast fashion. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10(3), 329–344.
12.
ChenY. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319.
13.
ChenY. S.ChangC. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 489–500.
14.
CraneD. (1999). Diffusion models and fashion: A reassessment. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1), 13–24.
15.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648.
16.
CuddyA. J.GlickP.BeningerA. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73–98.
17.
DaviesI. A.LeeZ.AhonkhaiI. (2012). Do consumers care about ethical-luxury?Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 37–51.
18.
DegensteinL.McQueenR. H.McNeillL.HamlinR.WakesS. J.DunnL. A. (2020). Impact of physical condition on disposal and end-of-life extension of clothing. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(6), 586–596.
19.
Edinger-SchonsL. M.SipiläJ.SenS.MendeG.WiesekeJ. (2018). Are two reasons better than one? The role of appeal type in consumer responses to sustainable products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(4), 644–664.
20.
FlaviánC.GuinaliuM.TorresE. (2005). The influence of corporate image on consumer trust: A comparative analysis in traditional versus internet banking. Internet Research, 15(4), 447–470.
21.
GohS. K.BalajiM. S. (2016). Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 629–638.
22.
GrandeyA. A.FiskG. M.MattilaA. S.JansenK. J.SidemanL. A. (2005). Is “service with a smile” enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 38–55.
23.
GutsatzM.HeineK. (2018). Luxury brand-building and development: New global challenges, new business models. Journal of Brand Management, 25(5), 409–410.
24.
HanJ.SeoY.KoE. (2017). Staging luxury experiences for understanding sustainable fashion consumption: A balance theory application. Journal of Business Research, 74, 162–167.
25.
HauserD. J.SchwarzN. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407.
26.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
27.
JainS. K.KaurG. (2004). Green marketing: An attitudinal and behavioural analysis of Indian consumers. Global Business Review, 5(2), 187–205.
28.
JoyA.SherryJ. F.VenkateshA. J.WangJ.ChanR. (2012). Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fashion Theory, 16, 273–296.
29.
KalafatisS. P.PollardM.EastR.TsogasM. H. (1999). Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: A cross-market examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(5), 441–460.
30.
KangJ.LiuC.KimS.-H. (2013). Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption: The role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 442–452.
31.
KapfererJ. N. (2010). All that glitters is not green: The challenge of sustainable luxury. European Business Review, 2, 40–45.
32.
KapfererJ. N.Michaut-DenizeauA. (2017). Is luxury compatible with sustainability? Luxury consumers’ viewpoint. In KapfererJ. N.KernstockJ.BrexendorfT.PowellS. (Eds.), Advances in luxury brand management (pp. 123–156). Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
KimJ. C.ParkB.DuboisD. (2018). How consumers’ political ideology and status-maintenance goals interact to shape their desire for luxury goods. Journal of Marketing, 82(6), 132–149.
34.
KimW. H.MalekK.RobertsK. R. (2019). The effectiveness of green advertising in the convention industry: An application of a dual coding approach and the norm activation model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39, 185–192.
35.
KimY. K.ForneyJ.ArnoldE. (1997). Environmental messages in fashion advertisements: Impact on consumer responses. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(3), 147–154.
36.
KumarP.PolonskyM. J. (2017). An analysis of the green consumer domain within sustainability research: 1975 to 2014. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(2), 85–96.
37.
LeonidouC. N.KatsikeasC. S.MorganN. A. (2013). “Greening” the marketing mix: Do firms do it and does it pay off?Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 151–170.
38.
LeonidouC. N.SkarmeasD. (2017). Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 401–415.
39.
MatthesJ.WonnebergerA. (2014). The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 115–127.
40.
McCrackenG. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310–321.
41.
McNeillL. S.SnowdonJ. (2019). Slow fashion–Balancing the conscious retail model within the fashion marketplace. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(4), 215–223.
42.
MillerK. W.MillsM. K. (2012). Probing brand luxury: A multiple lens approach. Journal of Brand Management, 20(1), 41–51.
43.
MitchellV. W.PapavassiliouV. (1999). Marketing causes and implications of consumer confusion. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(4), 319–342.
44.
MoisanderJ. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 404–409.
45.
MorganL. R.BirtwistleG. (2009). An investigation of young fashion consumers’ disposal habits. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 190–198.
46.
NewmanG. E.GorlinM.DharR. (2014). When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 823–839.
47.
NyilasyG.GangadharbatlaH.PaladinoA. (2014). Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 693–707.
48.
OlsenM. C.SlotegraafR. J.ChandukalaS. R. (2014). Green claims and message frames: How green new products change brand attitude. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 119–137.
49.
OttmanJ. A. (1992). Industry’s response to green consumerism. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 3–7.
50.
PapadasK. K.AvlonitisG. J.CarriganM. (2017). Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 80, 236–246.
51.
ParguelB.Benoît-MoreauF.LarceneuxF. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15–28.
52.
PomeringA.JohnsonL. W. (2009). Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image: Inhibiting skepticism to enhance persuasion. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(4), 420–439.
53.
RomaniS.GrappiS.BagozziR. P. (2016). Corporate socially responsible initiatives and their effects on consumption of green products. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 253–264.
54.
RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 549–555.
ShenB.WangY.LoC. K.ShumM. (2012). The impact of ethical fashion on consumer purchase behavior. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 16(2), 234–245.
SpillerS. A.FitzsimonsG. J.LynchJ. G.Jr.McClellandG. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277–288.
59.
SprolesG. B.KendallE. L. (1986). A methodology for profiling consumers’ decision-making styles. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 20, 267–279.
60.
SteinhartY.AyalonO.PutermanH. (2013). The effect of an environmental claim on consumers’ perceptions about luxury and utilitarian products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 53, 277–286.
61.
TodeschiniB. V.CortimigliaM. N.Callegaro-de-MenezesD.GhezziA. (2017). Innovative and sustainable business models in the fashion industry: Entrepreneurial drivers, opportunities, and challenges. Business Horizons, 60(6), 759–770.
62.
TurnbullP. W.LeekS.YingG. (2000). Customer confusion: The mobile phone market. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1–3), 143–163.
63.
VandermerweS.OliffM. D. (1990). Customers drive corporations. Long Range Planning, 23(6), 10–16.
64.
VigneronF.JohnsonL. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), 484–506.
65.
WalshG.MitchellV. W. (2010). The effect of consumer confusion proneness on word of mouth, trust, and customer satisfaction. European Journal of Marketing, 44(6), 838–859.
66.
WangW.KrishnaA.McFerranB. (2017). Turning off the lights: Consumers’ environmental efforts depend on visible efforts of firms. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 478–494.
67.
WhiteK.SimpsonB. (2013). When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors?Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 78–95.
68.
WilcoxK.KimH. M.SenS. (2009). Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands?Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 247–259.
