Attitudes Towards Forensic Autopsy Standard B3.7 and the Use of Physician Extenders in Select Autopsy Cases

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated that autopsy is the gold standard for determining cause and manner of death. Indeed, the current National Association of Medical Examiners standard B3.7 states that a forensic pathologist (FP) shall perform a forensic autopsy when the death is by apparent intoxication by alcohol, drugs, or poison. Unfortunately, the recent increase in drug-related deaths has led to some question about the feasibility of maintaining compliance with standard B3.7. We constructed a voluntary survey to address consensus on standard B3.7 and the use of supervised accredited pathologists’ assistants (PAs) in performing select medicolegal autopsies. Additional questions were included to help characterize variables related to FP’s workload and experience. Each of these variables was predicted to influence FP’s attitudes toward B3.7 and the use of PAs. Our respondent pool (n = 107) consisted primarily of actively practicing FPs with administrative responsibilities (42%) and actively practicing FPs without administrative responsibilities (41%). Sixty-five percent agreed that standard B3.7 is appropriate. Opinion on the use of PAs was split between those who agreed (45%) and those who did not (44%). Tendency to agree with either B3.7 or the use of PAs was not a function of FP’s individual or office workload; however, respondents were more likely to agree with B3.7 if they previously experienced a case where internal autopsy findings radically altered diagnosis in an otherwise suggestive overdose case (P < 0.001). In certain offices and under certain conditions, the use of PAs may be one solution to ensuring all potential overdose deaths receive an autopsy.

Keywords

Forensic pathology Pathologists’ assistants Forensic autopsy Performance standards Overdose

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dye

McGwin

Atherton

, et al. Correctly identifying deaths due to drug toxicity without a forensic autopsy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2019 Feb 15. PMID: 30789365. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000465.

Nashelsky

Lawrence

. Accuracy of cause of death determination without forensic autopsy examination. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2003 Dec; 24(4):313–9. PMID: 14634467. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.paf.0000097857.50734.c3.

Vanatta

Petty

. Limitations of the forensic external examination in determining the cause and manner of death. Hum Pathol. 1987 Feb; 18(2):170–4. PMID: 3804321. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(87)80335-0.

Davis

; The National Association of Medical Examiners and American College of Medical Toxicology Expert Panel on Evaluating and Reporting Opioid Deaths. National Association of Medical Examiners position paper: recommendations for the investigation, diagnosis, and certification of deaths related to opioid drugs. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2013 Mar; 3(1):77–83. https://doi.org/10.23907/2013.011.

Scholl

Seth

Kariisa

, et al. Drug and opioid-involved overdose deaths—United States, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 4; 67(5152):1419–27. PMID: 30605448. PMCID: PMC6334822. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm675152e1.

Introduction to the pathologists’ assistant scope of practice [Internet]. St. Paul (MN): American Association of Pathologists’ Assistants; 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 23]. 7 p. Available from: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.pathassist.org/resource/resmgr/docs/2018_-_scope_of_practice.pdf.