Beyond Grades in Online Learning: Adaptive Profiles of Academic Self-Regulation Among Naval Academy Undergraduates

Abstract

Educational psychologists have long known that students who are motivated to learn tend to experience greater academic success than their unmotivated counterparts. Using a social cognitive view of self-regulated learning as a theoretical framework, this study explored how motivational beliefs and negative achievement emotions are differentially configured among students in a self-paced online course. Additionally, this study examined how these different motivation-emotion configurations relate to various measures of academic success. Naval Academy undergraduates completed a survey that assessed their motivational beliefs (self-efficacy and task value); negative achievement emotions (boredom and frustration); and a collection of outcomes that included their use of self-regulated learning strategies (elaboration and metacognition), course satisfaction, continuing motivation, and final course grade. Students differed vastly in their configurations of course-related motivations and emotions. Moreover, students with more adaptive profiles (i.e., high motivational beliefs/low negative achievement emotions) exhibited higher mean scores on all five outcomes than their less-adaptive counterparts. Taken together, these findings suggest that online educators and instructional designers should take steps to account for motivational and emotional differences among students and attempt to create curricula and adopt instructional practices that promote self-efficacy and task value beliefs and mitigate feelings of boredom and frustration.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

I. E.

Seaman

(2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf

Artino

A. R.

(2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students' satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8, 191–202.

Artino

A. R.

(2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 260–270.

Artino

A. R.

McCoach

D. B.

(2008). Development and initial validation of the Online Learning Value and Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 379–403.

Artino

A. R.

Stephens

J. M.

(2006). Learning online: Motivated to self-regulation? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10, 176–182.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

Bell

P. D.

Akroyd

(2006). Can factors related to self-regulated learning predict learning achievement in undergraduate asynchronous Web-based courses? International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(10), 5–16.

Bernard

R. M.

Abrami

P. C.

Lou

Borokhovski

Wade

Wozney

Huang

(2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.

Boekaerts

Pintrich

P. R.

Zeidner

(Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

10.

Brown

T. A.

(2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

11.

Chiu

Sun

T. L.

(2007). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of Web-based learning continuance. Computers and Education, 49, 1224–1245.

12.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

13.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

College Board. (2007). 2007 college-bound seniors: Total group profile report. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2007/national-report.pdf

15.

Dabbagh

Kitsantas

(2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered Web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3, 40–47.

16.

Eccles

Wigfield

(1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.

17.

Flavell

(1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

18.

Fletcher

J. D.

Tobias

Wisher

R. A.

(2007). Learning anytime, anywhere: Advanced distributed learning and the changing face of education. Educational Researcher, 36, 96–102.

19.

Gable

R. K.

Wolfe

M. B.

(1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

20.

Gunawardena

C. N.

McIsaac

M. S.

(2004). Distance education. In Jonassen

D. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 355–396). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Hartley

Bendixen

L. D.

(2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22–26.

22.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

23.

Joo

Bong

Choi

(2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5–17.

24.

Judd

C. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1981). Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Kenny

D. A.

Milan

(2007). Data Analysis Training Institute of Connecticut: Structural equation modeling. Storrs: University of Connecticut, Department of Psychology.

26.

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

27.

Lim

C. K.

(2001). Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 41–51.

28.

Linnenbrink

E. A.

(2006). Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 307–314.

29.

Linnenbrink

E. A.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37, 69–78.

30.

Linnenbrink

E. A.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2004). Role of affect in cognitive processing in academic contexts. In Dai

D. Y.

Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 57–87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

31.

Lynch

Dembo

(2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1–16.

32.

Maehr

(1976). Continuing motivation: An analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Review of Educational Research, 46, 443–462.

33.

Mayer

R. E.

(2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 226–232.

34.

Miltiadou

Savenye

W. C.

(2003). Applying social cognitive constructs of motivation to enhance student success in online distance education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 11, 78–95.

35.

Moore

M. G.

Kearsley

(2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

36.

O'Regan

(2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 78–92.

37.

Peck

S. C.

Roeser

R. W.

(Eds.). (2003). Person-centered approaches to studying development in context: New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 101). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

38.

Pekrun

(2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.

39.

Pekrun

Elliot

A. J.

Maier

M. A.

(2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583–597.

40.

Pekrun

Goetz

Perry

R. P.

(2005). Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ): User's manual. Munich, Germany: University of Munich, Department of Psychology.

41.

Pekrun

Goetz

Titz

Perry

R. P.

(2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 99–105.

42.

Phipps

Merisotis

(1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.

43.

Picard

R. W.

Papert

Bender

Blumberg

Breazeal

Cavallo

Strohecker

(2004). Affective learning—A manifesto. BT Technology Journal, 22, 253–269.

44.

Pintrich

P. R.

(1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470.

45.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts

Pintrich

P. R.

Zeidner

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

46.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.

47.

Pintrich

P. R.

De Groot

E. V.

(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

48.

Pintrich

P. R.

Garcia

(1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In Maehr

M. L.

Pintrich

P. R.

(Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371–402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

49.

Pintrich

P. R.

Smith

D. A. F.

Garcia

McKeachie

W. J.

(1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

50.

Preacher

K. J.

Rucker

D. D.

MacCallum

R. C.

Nicewander

W. A.

(2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10, 178–192.

51.

Resnick

(2002). Rethinking learning in the digital age. In Kirkman

(Ed.), The global information technology report: Readiness for the networked world (pp. 32–37). London, England: Oxford University Press.

52.

Roca

J. C.

Chiu

Martinez

F. J.

(2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Human-Computer Studies, 64, 683–696.

53.

Schunk

D. H.

(2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 85–94.

54.

Schunk

D. H.

Ertmer

P. A.

(2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In Boekaerts

Pintrich

P. R.

Zeidner

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–650). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

55.

Schunk

D. H.

Pintrich

P. R.

Meece

J. L.

(2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

56.

Schunk

D. H.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

57.

Schunk

D. H.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(Eds.). (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

58.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

59.

Sitzmann

Kraiger

Stewart

Wisher

R. A.

(2006). The comparative effectiveness of Web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623–664.

60.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

61.

Tallent-Runnels

M. K.

Thomas

J. A.

Lan

W. Y.

Cooper

Ahern

T. C.

Shaw

S. M.

Liu

(2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93–135.

62.

United States Naval Academy. (2007). Class of 2011 profile. Retrieved from http://www.usna.edu/Admissions/documents/Classof2011Profile.pdf

63.

Wang

A. Y.

Newlin

M. H.

(2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an online class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 151–163.

64.

Whipp

J. L.

Chiarelli

(2004). Self-regulation in a Web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22.

65.

Wosnitza

Volet

(2005). Origin, direction and impact of emotions in social online learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 449–464.

66.

Zembylas

Theodorou

Pavlakis

(2008). The role of emotions in the experience of online learning: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Media International, 45, 107–117.

67.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts

Pintrich

P. R.

Zeidner

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

68.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In Schunk

D. H.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 267–296). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

69.

Zusho

Pintrich

P. R.

Coppola

(2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1081–1094.