Differentiation is recommended as the best teaching strategy to nurture gifted and talented (GT) students. While numerous studies have explored teachers’ perceptions of differentiating instruction for GT students in Western countries, the body of literature on this phenomenon remains small in non-Western contexts. This study attempted to understand the differentiation of the curriculum for GT students among teachers in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Maker's model was used as a framework to guide development of the Gifted Teaching and Talent Development Scale (GTDS) and collect data from 239 teachers in the UAE. We assessed the structural validity of the GTDS using AMOS software to perform confirmatory factor analysis. Further, we used SPSS to compute multivariate analysis of variance, which revealed differences between background and latent variables (content, process, product, and environment). The findings support the use of multifaceted lenses to study gifted teaching behavior and its other implications.
AgellC.KelloggM. (2021). A field guide to gifted students: A teacher’s introduction to identifying and meeting the needs of gifted learners. Routledge.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
4.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
5.
AlamerS. M.PhillipsonS. N. (2022). Current status and future prospects of Saudi gifted education: A macro-systemic perspective. High Ability Studies, 33(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1840966
6.
Albaili (2010). Building mathematical and scientific Talent in the MENA region. Paper Presented at Royal Scientific Society of Jordan AAAS John Templeton Foundation September 27–29, 2010.
AlloteyG. A.WattersJ. J.KingD. (2020). Ghanaian Science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about gifted education strategies. Gifted Education International, 36(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420946732
9.
AntounM.KronborgL.PlunkettM. (2020). Investigating Lebanese primary school teachers’ perceptions of gifted and highly able students. Gifted and Talented International, 35(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2020.1783398
BaharA. K.MakerC. J.ScherbakovaA. (2021). The role of teachers’ implementation of the real engagement in active problem solving (REAPS) model in developing creative problem solving in mathematics. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 30(2), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2021.0013
12.
BondieR.ZushoA. (2018). Differentiated instruction made practical: Engaging the extremes through classroom routines. Routledge.
13.
ByrneB. M. (2016). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (third edition). Routledge.
DavidH. (2011). The importance of teachers’ attitude in nurturing and educating gifted children. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1-2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673590
18.
DavisG. A.RimmS.SiegleD. (2015). Grouping, differentiation, and enrichment. Pearson.
19.
ElhowerisH.AlhosaniN.AlsheikhN.BacsalR. M. G.BontiE. (2022). The impact of an enrichment program on the Emirati verbally gifted children. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030068
20.
Endepohls-UlpeM.RufH. (2006). Primary school teachers’ criteria for the identification of gifted pupils. High Ability Studies, 16(02), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130600618140
21.
ErdoganS. C. (2017). Science teaching attitudes and scientific attitudes of pre-service teachers of gifted students. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130600618140
GardnerH. (1990). Developing the spectrum of human intelligences. Canadian Children: Journal of the Canadian Association for Young Children, 15(1), 9–17.
24.
HeacoxD.CashR. M. (2014). Differentiation for gifted learners: Going beyond the basics. Free Spirit Publishing.
25.
HewardL. W. (2013.). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. Pearson Education.
26.
HewardW. L.FordD. Y. (2013). Gifted and talented. In HewardW. L. (Ed.), Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (pp. 453–491). Pearson Education.
27.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
28.
HuntB. G.SeneyR. W. (2009). Planning the learning environment. In KanesF. A.BeanS. M. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching gifted (pp. 37–74). Prufrock Press.
29.
IsmailS. A. A.AlghawiM. A.AlSuwaidiK. A.ZieglerA. (2022). Gifted education in Arab countries: Analyses from a learning-resource perspective. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2115620. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2115620
30.
JuriševičM.ŽerakU. (2019). Attitudes towards gifted students and their education in the Slovenian context. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 12(4), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2019.0406
31.
KaplanS. N. (2022). Factors affecting the perceptions and practices of differentiated curricula and pedagogies for gifted and talented students. Education Sciences, 12(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010041
32.
KaufmanJ. C. (2015). Why creativity isn’t in IQ tests, why it matters, and why it won’t change anytime soon probably. Journal of Intelligence, 3, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.3390/jitelligence3030059
33.
KerrB. A.WrightJ. D.HuffmanJ. M.BirdnowM.RederM.StullO. A.MalmstenR. N. (2021). Cognitive ability, personality, and privilege: A trait-complex approach to talent development. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 195–214). Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
KuntK.TortopH. S. (2017). Examination of science and technology teachers’ attitude and opinions related giftedness and gifted education in Turkey. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 5(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2017.53
LaineS.TirriK. (2016). How Finnish elementary school teachers meet the needs of their gifted students. High Ability Studies, 27(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1108185
37.
MajokoT. (2017). Inclusion in early childhood education: A Zimbabwean perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(12), 1210–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1335354
38.
MakerC. J. (1982). Teaching models in the education of the gifted. Pro-Ed.
39.
MakerC. J.MuammarO.SerinoL.KuangC. C.MohamedA.SakU. (2006). The DISCOVER curriculum model: Nurturing and enhancing creativity in all children. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 3(2), 99–121.
40.
MakerC. J.PeaseR. (2021). Building on and extending the characteristics of gifted learners: Implementing the real engagement in active problem solving (REAPS) teaching model. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 30(2), 5–25.
41.
MakerC. J.ShieverS. W. (2010). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners (3rd ed.). PRO-ED.
42.
MakerC. J.ZimmermanR.BaharA. K.In-AlbonC. (2021). The influence of real engagement in active problem solving on deep learning: An important component of exceptional talent in the 21st century context. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 30(2), 40–63.
43.
MatheisS.KellerL. K.KronborgL.SchmittM.PreckelF. (2020). Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and gender stereotypes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about student characteristics in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029
44.
McclainM.-C.PfeifferS. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2012.643757
45.
McCoachD. B.SiegleD. (2007). What predics teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted?The Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302
46.
MelesseT.BelayS. (2022). Differentiating instruction in primary and middle schools: Does variation in students’ learning attribute matter?Cogent Education, 9(1), 2105552. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2105552
47.
Mengual-AndrésS.Roig-VilaR.MiraJ. B. (2016). Delphi study for the design and validation of a questionnaire about digital competences in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0009-y
NyarkoK.KugbeyN.AmissahC. M.Ansah-NyarkoM.BoatengF. (2017). Teacher identified giftedness qualities in a Ghanaian school setting: A brief report. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 27(6), 545–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2017.1375224
50.
OpokuM. P. (2022). The intentions of teachers towards practicing inclusive education in secondary schools in Ghana: A qualitative study. African Education Review, 18(3-14), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2022.2150869
51.
OpokuM. P.CuskellyM.PedersenS. J.RaynerS. C. (2021). Attitudes and self-efficacy as significant predictor of intention of secondary school teachers towards the implementation of inclusive education in Ghana. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36, 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00490-5
52.
OpokuM. P.CuskellyM.RaynerS. C.PedersenS. J. (2022). The impact of teacher attributes on intentions toward practicing inclusive education in secondary schools in Ghana. International Journal of Disability, Education and Development, 69(2), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1731434
53.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). A literature review on the policy approaches and initiatives for the inclusion of gifted students in OECD countries. A paper presented in the second meeting of country representatives, 3 March 2020, OECD Conference Center, Paris.
54.
PallantJ. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th edition). Open University Press.
55.
PeaseR.VukeM.June MakerC.MuammarO. M. (2020). A practical guide for implementing the STEM assessment results in classrooms: Using strength-based reports and real engagement in active problem solving. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(3), 367–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20911643
56.
PluckerJ. A.McWilliamsJ.GuoJ. (2021). Smart contexts for 21st century talent development. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 295–316). Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
PlunkettM.KronborgL. (2011). Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1-2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673587
58.
PomortsevaN. P. (2014). Teaching gifted children in regular classroom in the USA. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143(2014), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.377
59.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (2004). Curriculum compacting: A research-based differentiation strategy for culturally diverse talented students. In BootheD.StanleyJ. C. (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education (pp. 87–100). Prufrock.
60.
RobinsonA.ShoreB. M.EnersenD. L. (2007). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Prufrock Press, Inc.
61.
Ronksley-PaviaM. L. (2010). Curriculum differentiation: A practical approach. Mindscape, 30(2), 4–11.
62.
SchumackerE.LomaxG. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge.
63.
SilvermanL. K.LevitonL. P.HaasS. C. (2015). Engaging different types of gifted learners. In VidergorH. E.HarrisC. R. (Eds.), Applied practice for educators of gifted and able learners (pp. 25–42). Sense Publishers.
64.
SternbergR. J. (2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved knowledge. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130120084311
65.
SternbergR. J. (2019). A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(4), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/intelligence7040034
66.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2017). Transforming gifted education into talent development. In PluckerJ. A.RinnA.MakelM. (Eds.), From giftedness to gifted education: Reflecting theory in practice (pp. 249–266). Prufrock Press.
67.
TannenbaumA. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 45–59). Allyn & Bacon.
68.
TayL.JebbA. (2017). Scale development. In RogelbergS. (Ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1093–1096). Sage.
69.
TeixeiraV.CorreiaA.MonteiroE.KuokA. C.ForlinC. (2018). Placement, inclusion, law and teachers’ perceptions in Macao’s schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(9), 1014–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1414318
70.
TirriK. (2017). Teacher education is the key to changing the identification and teaching of the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 210–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318996
TirriK.LaineS. (2017). Ethical challenges in inclusive education: The case of gifted students. In GajewskiA. (Ed.), Ethics, equity, and inclusive education international perspectives on inclusive education (pp. 239–257). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
73.
TirriK.UusikyläK. (1994). How teachers perceive differentiation of education among the gifted and talented. Gifted and Talented International, 9(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.1994.11672798
74.
TomlinsonC. A.BrightonC.HertbergH.CallahanC. M.MoonT. R.BrimijoinK.ConoverL. A.ReynoldsT. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2/3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
75.
TortopH. S.KuntK. (2013). Investigation of primary school teachers' attitudes towards gifted education. Online Submission, 5(2), 441–451.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.FengA.BrownE.BrackenB.StambaughT.FrenchH.BaiW.WorleyB.QuekC.BaiW. (2008). A study of differentiated instructional change over three years. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208321809
78.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.HubbardG. F.RobbinsJ. I. (2020). Differentiation of instruction for gifted learners: Collated evaluative studies of teacher classroom practices. Roeper Review, 42(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1765919
79.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_5
80.
VidergorH. E. (2015). The ambassador: Leadership for gifted and able students. In VidergorH. E.HarrisC. R. (Eds.), Applied practice for educators of gifted and able learners (pp. 587–602). Sense Publishers.
81.
VreysC.NdungbogunG. N.KieboomT.VenderickxK. (2018). Training effects on Belgian preschool and primary school teachers’ attitudes towards the best practices for gifted children. High Ability Studies, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1312295
82.
YanT.DengM. (2019). Regular education teachers’ concerns on inclusive education in China from the perspective of concerns-based adoption model. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(4), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1435741
