The rising rates, high prevalence, and adverse consequences of obesity and diabetes call for new approaches to the complex behaviors needed to prevent and manage these conditions. Virtual reality (VR) technologies, which provide controllable, multisensory, interactive three-dimensional (3D) stimulus environments, are a potentially valuable means of engaging patients in interventions that foster more healthful eating and physical activity patterns. Furthermore, the capacity of VR technologies to motivate, record, and measure human performance represents a novel and useful modality for conducting research. This article summarizes background information and discussions for a joint July 2010 National Institutes of Health — Department of Defense workshop entitled Virtual Reality Technologies for Research and Education in Obesity and Diabetes. The workshop explored the research potential of VR technologies as tools for behavioral and neuroscience studies in diabetes and obesity, and the practical potential of VR in fostering more effective utilization of diabetes- and obesity-related nutrition and lifestyle information.
Virtual reality technologies were considered especially relevant for fostering desirable health-related behaviors through motivational reinforcement, personalized teaching approaches, and social networking. Virtual reality might also be a means of extending the availability and capacity of health care providers. Progress in the field will be enhanced by further developing available platforms and taking advantage of VR's capabilities as a research tool for well-designed hypothesis-testing behavioral science. Multidisciplinary collaborations are needed between the technology industry and academia, and among researchers in biomedical, behavioral, pedagogical, and computer science disciplines. Research priorities and funding opportunities for use of VR to improve prevention and management of obesity and diabetes can be found at agency websites (National Institutes of Health: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html; Department of Defense: www.tatrc.org).
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Virtual reality technologies for research and education in obesity and diabetes. Workshop executive summary. 2010. Available from: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/workshops/vr.htm. Accessed on February 24, 2011.
2.
OgdenCLCarrollMDCurtinLRLambMMFlegalKM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA.2010;303 (3): 242–9.
3.
OgdenCLFlegalKM. Changes in terminology for childhood overweight and obesity. Natl Health Stat Report.2010; (25): 1–5.
4.
National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse. National diabetes statistics, 2011. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; February 2011; NIH Publication No. 11-3892; Available from: http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/index.htm. Accessed on February 24, 2011.
5.
ClarkeW. Behavioral challenges in the management of childhood diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 225–8.
6.
BaranowskiTBaranowskiJThompsonDBudayR. Behavioral science in video games for children's diet and physical activity change: Key research needs. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 229–33.
7.
TalbotB. Virtual reality and interactive gaming technology for obese and diabetic children: Is military medical technology applicable?J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 234–8.
8.
TalAWansinkB. Turning virtual reality into reality: A checklist to ensure virtual reality studies of eating behavior and physical activity match the real world. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 239–44.
9.
VigerskyRA. An overview of management issues in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 245–50.
10.
Lloyd-JonesDMHongYLabartheDMozaffarianDAppelLJVan HornLGreenlundKDanielsSNicholGTomaselliGFArnettDKFonarowGCHoPMLauerMSMasoudiFARobertsonRMRogerVSchwammLHSorliePYancyCWRosamondWD; American Heart Association Strategic Planning Task Force and Statistics Committee. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: The American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation.2010;121 (4): 586–613.
11.
GelladWFGrenardJMcGlynnEA. A review of barriers to medication adherence: A framework for driving policy options. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation; 2009 [cited 2010]. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2009/RAND_TR765.sum.pdf. Accessed February 24, 2011.
12.
OsbornCYCavanaughKWallstonKARothmanRL. Self-efficacy links health literacy and numeracy to glycemic control. J Health Commun.2010;15 (Suppl 2): 146–58.
13.
KerrDMardenS. Numeracy and insulin pump therapy. Diabet Med.2010;27 (6): 730–1.
14.
PetterMBlanchardCKempKAMazoffASFerrierSN. Correlates of exercise among coronary heart disease patients: Review, implications and future directions. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil.2009;16 (5): 515–26.
15.
StraumanisJ. The science of learning: Breaking news. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 251–5.
16.
HoldenMK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsychol Behav.2005;8 (3): 187–211.
RizzoAABuckwalterJGvan der ZaagC. Virtual environment applications for neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. In StanneyK, editor. Handbook of virtual environments. New York: L. A. Erlbaum; 2002. p. 1027–64.
19.
RizzoAASchultheisMTKernsKMateerC. Analysis of assets for virtual reality applications in neuropsychology. Neuropsychol Rehabil.2005;14 (1): 207–39.
20.
RothbaumBOHodgesLFReadyDGraapKAlarconRD. Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry.2001;62 (8): 617–22.
21.
DifedeJCukorJJayasingheNPattIJedelSSpielmanLGiosanCHoffmanHG. Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder following September 11, 2001. J Clin Psychiatry.2007;68 (11): 1639–47.
22.
ResslerKJ. , Rothbaum BO, Tannenbaum L, Anderson P, Graap K, Zimand E, Hodges L, Davis M. Cognitive enhancers as adjuncts to psychotherapy: Use of D-cycloserine in phobic individuals to facilitate extinction of fear. Arch Gen Psychiatry.2004;61 (11): 1136–44.
RothbaumBOAndersonPZimandEHodgesLLangDWilsonJ. Virtual reality exposure therapy and standard (in vivo) exposure therapy in the treatment for the fear of flying. Behav Ther.2006;37 (1): 80–90.
25.
ParsonsTDBowerlyTBuckwalterJGRizzoAA. A controlled clinical comparison of attention performance in children with ADHD in a virtual reality classroom compared to standard neuropsychological methods. Child Neuropsychol.2007;13 (4): 363–81.
26.
ParsonsTRizzoAA. Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: A meta-analysis. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry.2008;39 (3): 250–61.
27.
PowersMEmmelkampPM. Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord.2008;22 (3): 561–9.
28.
RizzoASDifedeJRothbaumBORegerGSpitalnickJCukorJMcLayR. Development and early evaluation of the virtual Iraq/Afghanistan exposure therapy system for combat-related PTSD. Ann N Y Acad Sci.2010;1208: 114–25.
29.
GoldJIKimSHKantAJRizzoAA. Virtual anesthesia: The use of virtual reality for pain distraction during acute medical interventions. Semin Anesth Periop Med Pain.2005;24: 203–10.
30.
HoffmanHGPattersonDRSeibelESoltaniMJewett-LeahyLShararSR. Virtual reality pain control during burn wound debridement in the hydrotank. Clin J Pain.2008;24 (4): 299–304.
31.
RizzoAABowerlyTBuckwalterJGKlimchukDMituraRParsonsTD. A virtual reality scenario for all seasons: The virtual classroom. CNS Spectr.2006;11 (1): 35–44.
32.
RizzoALangeBBolasM. Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: New tools to address obesity and diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 256–64.
33.
BordnickPCarterBTraylorA. What virtual reality research in addictions can tell us about the future of obesity assessment and treatment. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 265–71.
34.
MorieJ. Extending the reach of healthcare for obesity and diabetes using virtual worlds. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 272–6.
35.
GargNWansinkBInmanJJ. The influence of incidental affect on consumers' food intake. J Mark.2007;71 (1): 194–206.
36.
LangeBFlynnSRizzoA. Initial usability assessment of off-the-shelf video game consoles for clinical game-based motor rehabilitation. Phys Ther Rev.2009;14 (5): 355–63.
37.
LangeBSFlynnSProffittRChangCYRizzoAA. Development of an interactive game-based rehabilitation tool for dynamic balance training. Top Stroke Rehabil.2010;17 (5): 345–52.
38.
RuppertB. New directions in virtual environments and gaming to address obesity and diabetes: Industry perspective. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 277–82.
39.
RivaG. The key to unlocking the virtual body: Virtual reality in the treatment of obesity and eating disorders. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 283–92.
40.
KaholK. Integrative gaming: A framework for sustainable game-based diabetes management. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 293–300.
41.
MeriansA. Learning in a virtual environment using haptic systems for movement re-education: Can this medium be used for remodeling other behaviors and actions?J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 301–8.
42.
DeutschJ. Using virtual reality to improve walking post-stroke: Translation to individuals with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 309–14.
43.
WansinkBPainterJELeeYK. The office candy dish: Proximity's influence on estimated and actual candy consumption. Int J Obes.2006;30 (5): 871–5.
44.
WansinkB. Advertising's impact on category substitution. J Mark Res.1994;31 (4): 501–15.
45.
RuppertB. New directions in the use of virtual reality for food shopping: Marketing and education perspectives. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 315–8.
46.
ChandonPWansinkB. The biasing health halos of fast food restaurant health claims: Lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. J Consum Res.2007;34 (3): 301–14.
47.
ChandonPWansinkB. How biased household inventory estimates distort shopping and storage decisions. J Mark.2006;70 (4): 118–35.
GayGPollakJ PAdamsPLeonardJ P. Aurora. Pilot study of Aurora, a social, mobile phone-based emotion sharing and recording system. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 325–32.
50.
PerskyS. Application of virtual reality methods to obesity prevention and management research. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 333–9.
51.
CoonsMJRoehrigMSpringB. The potential of virtual reality technologies to improve adherence to weight loss behaviors. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (2): 340–4.
52.
BassJTakahashiJS. Circadian integration of metabolism and energetics. Science.2010;330 (6009): 1349–54.
53.
MullingtonJMHaackMTothMSerradorJMMeier-EwertHK. Cardiovascular, inflammatory, and metabolic consequences of sleep deprivation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis.2009;51 (4): 294–302.
54.
KrygerMHRothTDementWC. Principles and practice of sleep medicine. 5th ed.Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010.
55.
PROMIS Network Investigators. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system: Dynamic tools to measure health outcomes from the patient perspective. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institutes of Health. [cited 2011 Jan 31]. Available from: www.nihpromis.org.
56.
StumboPJWeissRNewmanJWPenningtonJATuckerKLWiesenfeldPLIllnerAKKlurfeldDMKaputJ. Web-enabled and improved software tools and data are needed to measure nutrient intakes and physical activity for personalized health research. J Nutr.2010;140 (12): 2104–15.
57.
Office of Extramural Research. NIH research portfolio online reporting tool: Expenditures and results (RePORTER). Bethesda, Maryland: National Institutes of Health. [cited 2011 Jan 31]. Available from: http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm.
