Uncomplicated pregnancies (n = 16) were evaluated longitudinally and compared to early- (n = 12) and late-onset (n = 14) preeclampsia patients, assessed once at diagnosis. Pulse transit time (PTT), equivalent to pulse wave velocity, was measured as the time interval between corresponding characteristics of electrocardiography and Doppler waves, corrected for heart rate, at the level of renal interlobar veins, hepatic veins, and arcuate branches of uterine arteries. Impedance cardiography was used to measure PTT at the level of the thoracic aorta. In normal pregnancy, all PTT increased gradually (P ≤ .01). Pulse transit time was shorter in late-onset preeclampsia (P < .05) and also in early-onset preeclampsia, with exception for hepatic veins and thoracic aorta (P > .05). Our results indicate that PTT is an easy and highly accessible measure for vascular reactivity at both arterial and venous sites of the circulation. Our observations correlate well with known gestational cardiovascular adaptation mechanisms. This suggests that PTT could be used as a new parameter in the evaluation and prediction of preeclampsia.
GalderisiMCattaneoFMondilloS. Doppler echocardiography and myocardial dyssynchrony: a practical update of old and new ultrasound technologies. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. September, 2007;5:28.
2.
AllenJMurrayA. Age-related changes in peripheral pulse timing characteristics at the ears, fingers and toes. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16(10):711–717.
3.
Sharwood-SmithGBruceJDrummondG. Assessment of pulse transit time to indicate cardiovascular changes during obstetric spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(1):100–105.
4.
TomsinKMesensTMolenberghsGPeetersLGyselaersW. Time interval between maternal electrocardiogram and venous doppler waves in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia: a pilot study. Ultraschall Med. 2010. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1245698.
5.
BerzigottiACastaldiniNRossiV. Age dependency of regional impedance indices regardless of clinical stage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Ultraschall Med. 2009;30(3):277–285.
6.
PedersenJFDakhilAZJensenDBSondergaardBBytzerP. Abnormal hepatic vein Doppler waveform in patients without liver disease. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(927):242–244.
DaveyDAMacGillivrayI. The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(4):892–898.
9.
SakaiKImaizumiTMaedaH. Venous distensibility during pregnancy. Comparisons between normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Hypertension. 1994;24(4):461–466.
10.
GyselaersWMolenberghsGVan MieghemWOmbeletW. Doppler measurement of renal interlobar vein impedance index in uncomplicated and preeclamptic pregnancies. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;28(1):23–33.
11.
GyselaersW. Hemodynamics of the maternal venous compartment: a new area to explore in obstetric ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(5):716–717.
12.
HaendlTStrobelDSteinebrunnerNFrieserMHahnEGBernatikT. Hepatic transit time in benign liver lesions. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29(2):184–189.
13.
GrabDHutterWSterzikKTerindeR. Reference values for resistance index and pulsatility index of uteroplacental Doppler flow velocity waveforms based on 612 uneventful pregnancies. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1992;34(2):82–87.
14.
KimDW. Detection of physiological events by impedance. Yonsei Med J. 1989;30(1):1–11.
15.
WoltjerHHBogaardHJde VriesPM. The technique of impedance cardiography. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(9):1396–1403.
16.
SodolskiTKutarskiA.Impedance cardiography: a valuable method of evaluating haemodynamic parameters. Cardiol J. 2007;14(2):115–126.
17.
TomsinKMesensTMolenberghsGGyselaersW. Diurnal and position-induced variability of impedance cardiography measurements in healthy subjects. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011;31(2):145–150.
18.
VerbekeGMolenberghsG. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New-York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2001.
19.
FooJYLimCS. Pulse transit time as an indirect marker for variations in cardiovascular related reactivity. Technol Health Care. 2006;14(2):97–108.
20.
NaschitzJEBezobchukSMussafia-PriselacR. Pulse transit time by R-wave-gated infrared photoplethysmography: review of the literature and personal experience. J Clin Monit Comput. 2004;18(5-6):333–342.
21.
BenetosAWaeberBIzzoJ. Influence of age, risk factors, and cardiovascular and renal disease on arterial stiffness: clinical applications. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15(12):1101–1108.
NurnbergerJKribbenAPhilippT, Erbel R. [Arterial compliance (stiffness) as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis]. Herz. 2007;32(5):379–386.
24.
JaniBRajkumarC. Ageing and vascular ageing. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(968):357–362.
25.
WangXKeithJCJrStruthersADFeuersteinGZ. Assessment of arterial stiffness, a translational medicine biomarker system for evaluation of vascular risk. Cardiovasc Ther. 2008;26(3):214–223.
26.
AsmarR. Effect of antihypertensive agents on arterial stiffness as evaluated by pulse wave velocity: clinical implications. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2001;1(5):387–397.
27.
NicholsWWDenardoSJWilkinsonIBMcEnieryCMCockcroftJO'RourkeMF. Effects of arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity, and wave reflections on the central aortic pressure waveform. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;10(4):295–303.
28.
RonnbackMLampinenKGroopPHKaajaR. Pulse wave reflection in currently and previously preeclamptic women. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2005;24(2):171–180.
29.
Elvan-TaspinarAFranxABotsMLKoomansHABruinseHW. Arterial stiffness and fetal growth in normotensive pregnancy. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18(3):337–341.
30.
AvniBFrenkelGShaharLGolikAShermanDDishyV. Aortic stiffness in normal and hypertensive pregnancy. Blood Press. 2010;19(1):11–15.
31.
MacedoMLLuminosoDSavvidouMDMcEnieryCMNicolaidesKH. Maternal wave reflections and arterial stiffness in normal pregnancy as assessed by applanation tonometry. Hypertension. 2008;51(4):1047–1051.
32.
AllenJ. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007;28(3):R1–R39.
33.
LampinenKHRonnbackMKaajaRJGroopPH. Impaired vascular dilatation in women with a history of pre-eclampsia. J Hypertens. 2006;24(4):751–756.
34.
EdouardDAPannierBMLondonGMCucheJLSafarME. Venous and arterial behavior during normal pregnancy. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(5 pt 2):H1605–H1612.
35.
TihtonenKMKoobiTUotilaJT. Arterial stiffness in preeclamptic and chronic hypertensive pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128(1-2):180–186.
36.
RobbAOMillsNLDinJN. Influence of the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and preeclampsia on arterial stiffness. Hypertension. 2009;53(6):952–958.
37.
SmithSAMorrisJMGalleryED. Methods of assessment of the arterial pulse wave in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):472–476.
38.
PoppasAShroffSGKorcarzCE. Serial assessment of the cardiovascular system in normal pregnancy. Role of arterial compliance and pulsatile arterial load. Circulation. 1997;95(10):2407–2415.
39.
MersichBRigoJJrBesenyeiCLenardZStudingerPKollaiM. Opposite changes in carotid versus aortic stiffness during healthy human pregnancy. Clin Sci (Lond). 2005;109(1):103–107.
40.
GyselaersWMolenberghsGMesensTPeetersL. Maternal hepatic vein Doppler velocimetry during uncomplicated pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35(8):1278–1283.
41.
van OppenACvanDTIAlsbachGPHeethaarRMBruinseHW. A longitudinal study of maternal hemodynamics during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(1):40–46.
42.
AppletonCPHatleLKPoppRL. Superior vena cava and hepatic vein Doppler echocardiography in healthy adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10(5):1032–1039.
43.
OmmenSRNishimuraRAAppletonCP. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation. 2000;102(15):1788–1794.
44.
ValensiseHVasapolloBGagliardiGNovelliGP. Early and late preeclampsia: two different maternal hemodynamic states in the latent phase of the disease. Hypertension. 2008;52(5):873–880.
45.
KrabbendamICourtarDAJanssenBJAardenburgRPeetersLLSpaandermanME. Blunted autonomic response to volume expansion in formerly preeclamptic women with low plasma volume. Reprod Sci. 2009;16(1):105–112.
