Reengineering Electronic Fetal Monitoring Interpretation: Using the Fetal Reserve Index to Anticipate the Need for Emergent Operative Delivery

Abstract

Objective:

The near-ubiquitous use of electronic fetal monitoring has failed to lower the rates of both cerebral palsy and emergency operative deliveries (EODs). Its performance metrics have low sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for both. There are many EODs, but the vast majority have normal outcomes. The EODs, however, cause serious disruption in the delivery suite routine with increased complications, anxiety, and concern for all.

Methods:

We developed the fetal reserve index (FRI) as multicomponent algorithm including 4 FHR components (analyzed individually), uterine activity, and maternal, obstetrical, and fetal risk factors to assess risk of cerebral palsy and EOD. Scores were categorized into green, yellow, and red zones. Here, we studied 300 patients by the FRI, all of whom had normal neonatal outcomes. We attempted to distinguish the clinical course of those cases which required an EOD versus controls which did not.

Results:

51 cases with EOD had FRIs much lower than 249 non-EOD cases. The red zone was reached more frequently (P < .001) and lasted longer (1.06 vs 0.05 hours; P < .001). Reaching the red zone had a sensitivity of 92% for EOD, with a positive predictive value of 64% and a false positive rate of 10.4%.

Conclusions:

Our data suggest the FRI can significantly lower the incidence of EODs by identifying the opportunity for intrauterine resuscitation. Our approach can reduce the disruptive effects of EODs and their concomitant increased risks of complications. The FRI may provide a metric that can refine labor management to reduce CP and EODs.

Keywords

emergency operative deliveries stat cesarean delivery electronic fetal monitoring fetal reserve index ACOG monitoring classification system intrauterine resuscitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schifrin

Soliman

Koos

. Litigation related to intrapartum fetal surveillance. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;30:87–97.

Buttigieg

. The shifting sands of medico-legal intra-partum Ctg (I-P Ctg) monitoring. Med Leg J. 2016;84(1):42–45.

Eden

Evans

Schifrin

. The “Fetal Reserve Index”: re-engineering the interpretation and responses to fetal heart rate patterns[published online June 8, 2017]. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017. doi:10.1159/000475927.

Grimes

Peipert

. Electronic fetal monitoring as a public health screening program: the arithmetic of failure. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1397–1400.

Schifrin

Ater

. Fetal hypoxic and ischemic injuries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18(2):112–122.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):192–202.

ACOG. Neonatal Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy: Defining the pathogenesis and Pathophysiology. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2003:94.

Cibils

LA.

Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. V. Variable decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132(7):791–805.

Robson

. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Mater Med Rev. 2001;12(1):23–39.

10.

Clark

Nageotte

Garite

. Intrapartum management of category II fetal heart rate tracings: towards standardization of care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(2):89–97.

11.

Zhang

Troendle

Grantz

Reddy

. Statistical aspects of modeling the labor curve. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):750.e1-e4.

12.

Pinas

Chandraharan

. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: analysis, classification and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;30:33–47.

13.

Cohen

Friedman

. Perils of the new labor management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):420–427.

14.

Neal

Ryan

Lowe

. Labor Dystocia: Uses of Related Nomenclature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(5):485–498.

15.

Friedman

. Disordered labor: objective evaluation and management. J Fam Pract. 1975;2(3):167–172.

16.

Zhang

Landy

Branch

. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281–1287.

17.

Hamilton

Warrick

Collins

Smith

Garite

. Assessing first-stage labor progression and its relationship to complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):358.e1-e8.

18.

Neal

Lowe

Schorn

. Labor dystocia: a common approach to diagnosis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(5):499–509.

19.

ACOG. Neonatal Encephalopathy and Neurologic Outcome. D’Alton

, ed: Washington, DC: ACOG; 2014.

20.

Elliott

Warrick

Graham

Hamilton

. Graded classification of fetal heart rate tracings: association with neonatal metabolic acidosis and neurologic morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):258.e1-e8.

21.

Boriboonhirunsarn

Watananirun

Sompagdee

. Decision-to-delivery interval in pregnant women with intrapartum non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(6):998–1002.

22.

Clark

Hamilton

Garite

Timmins

Warrick

Smith

. The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(2):163.e1-163.e6.

23.

INFANT Collaborative Group. Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10080):1719–1729.

24.

Belfort

Saade

Thom

. A randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(7):632–641.

25.

Brown

Permezel

Holberton

Whitehead

. Neonatal outcomes after introduction of a national intrapartum fetal surveillance education program: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:1777–1781.

26.

Papoutsis

Antonakou

Gornall

Tzavara

Mohajer

. The SaTH risk-assessment tool for the prediction of emergency cesarean section in women having induction of labor for all indications: a large-cohort based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(1):59–66.

27.

Jonsson

Agren

Norden-Lindeberg

Ohlin

Hanson

. Neonatal encephalopathy and the association to asphyxia in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(6):667.e1-e8.

28.

Yamada

Cho

Morikawa

Yamada

Minakami

. Intrapartum risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy leading to cerebral palsy in women without apparent sentinel events. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(10):1520–1525.

29.

Macones

Hankins

Spong

Hauth

Moore

. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(5):510–515.

30.

Silberstein

Sheiner

Salem

. Fetal heart rate monitoring category 3 during the 2nd stage of labor is an independent predictor of fetal acidosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:257–300.

31.

Cahill

Macones

McKinstry

Smyser

Mathur

. EFM and peripartum factors associated with brain injury in term infants. AJOG. 2015;212(1):S5.

32.

Bakker

van Geijn

. Uterine activity: implications for the condition of the fetus. J Perinat Med. 2008;36(1):30–37.

33.

Kunz

Loftus

Nichols

. Incidence of uterine tachysystole in women induced with oxytocin. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013;42(1):12–18.

34.

Schifrin

Cohen

Deymier

. Cranial compression encephalopathy: fetal neurological injury and the mechanical forces of labor and delivery. In: Longo

Zahn

, eds. Stress and Developmental Programming of Health and Disease: Beyond Phenomenology. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2014:188–220.

35.

Bakker

Kurver

Kuik

Van Geijn

. Elevated uterine activity increases the risk of fetal acidosis at birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(4):313.e1-e6.