A Psychoevolutionary Approach to Identifying Preferred Nature Scenes With Potential to Provide Restoration From Stress

Abstract

Background:

Research supports therapeutic use of nature scenes in healthcare settings, particularly to reduce stress. However, limited literature is available to provide a cohesive guide for selecting scenes that may provide optimal therapeutic effect.

Objective:

This study produced and tested a replicable process for selecting nature scenes with therapeutic potential. Psychoevolutionary theory informed the construction of the Importance for Survival Scale (IFSS), and its usefulness for identifying scenes that people generally prefer to view and that hold potential to reduce stress was tested.

Methods:

Relationships between Importance for Survival (IFS), preference, and restoration were tested. General community participants (N = 20 males, 20 females; M age = 48 years) Q-sorted sets of landscape photographs (preranked by the researcher in terms of IFS using the IFSS) from most to least preferred, and then completed the Short-Version Revised Restoration Scale in response to viewing a selection of the scenes.

Results:

Results showed significant positive relationships between IFS and each of scene preference (large effect), and restoration potential (medium effect), as well as between scene preference and restoration potential across the levels of IFS (medium effect), and for individual participants and scenes (large effect).

Conclusions:

IFS was supported as a framework for identifying nature scenes that people will generally prefer to view and that hold potential for restoration from emotional distress; however, greater therapeutic potential may be expected when people can choose which of the scenes they would prefer to view. Evidence for the effectiveness of the IFSS was produced.

Keywords

inpatient hospitals access to nature mental health restoration from stress psychoevolutionary theory landscape images photographs nature scenes scene preference

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleton

(1975). The experience of landscape. London, England: Wiley.

Baum

Grunberg

N. E.

Singer

J. E.

(1982). The use of psychological and neuroendocrinological measures in the study of stress. Health Psychology, 1, 217–236. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.1.3.217

Berlyne

D. E.

(1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Berto

(2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4, 394–409. doi:10.3390/bs4040394

Bratman

G. N.

Hamilton

J. P.

Daily

G. C.

(2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 118–136. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x

Caplan

R. P.

(1994). Stress, anxiety, and depression in hospital consultants, general practitioners, and senior health service managers. British Medical Journal, 309, 1261–1263. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1261

Dzidowska

Price

Butow

(2010). Identifying research priorities and research needs among health and research professionals in psycho-oncology. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 6, 165–172. doi:10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01318.x

Field

(2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.

Freeman

(2007). The photographers eye. East Sussex, England: The Ilex Press.

10.

Han

K. T.

(2003). A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 209–232. doi:10.1016/s01692046(02)00241-4

11.

Han

K. T.

(2010). An exploration of relationships among the responses to natural scenes: Scenic beauty, preference, and restoration. Environment and Behavior, 42, 243–270. doi:10.1177/0013916509333875

12.

Hartmann

Apaolaza-Ibáñez

(2010). Beyond savanna: An evolutionary and environmental psychology approach to behavioral effects of nature scenery in green advertising. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.001

13.

Hashimoto

Clayton

(2009). Visual design fundamentals: A digital approach (Vol. 3). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

14.

Henry

J. D.

Crawford

J. R.

(2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239. doi:10.1348/014466505X29657

15.

Herzog

T. R.

Barnes

G. J.

(1999). Tranquility and preference revisited. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 171–181. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.0109

16.

Herzog

T. R.

Maguire

C. P.

Nebel

M. B.

(2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 159–170. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00113-5

17.

Heylihen

(1997). The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. New York, NY: Springer.

18.

Kaplan

(1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Kaplan

Wendt

J. S.

(1972). Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 354–356. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/d113gl6326gk5617/fulltext.pdf

20.

Kellert

S. R.

(1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In Kellert

S. R.

Wilson

E. O.

(Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 42–72). Washington, DC: Island Press.

21.

Lovibond

S. H.

Lovibond

P. F.

(1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation.

22.

Oliva

Mack

M. L.

Shrestha

Peeper

(2004). Identifying the perceptual dimensions of visual complexity of scenes. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, USA, 26, 1041–1046. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/17s4h6w8

23.

Orians

G. H.

(1986). An ecological and evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. In Penning-Roswell

E. C.

Lowenthal

(Eds.), Meanings and values in landscape (pp. 3–25). London, England: Allen & Unwin.

24.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research, 4, 17–23. doi:10.1080/01426397908705892

25.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1981). Natural versus Urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523–556. doi:10.1177/0013916581135001

26.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Altman

Wohlwill

J. F.

(Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

27.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Sciences, 224, 420–421. doi:10.1126/science.6143402

28.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In Kellert

S. R.

Wilson

E. O.

(Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137). Washington, DC: Island Press.

29.

Ulrich

R. S.

(2001). Effects of healthcare environmental design on medical outcomes. In Dilani

(Ed.), Design and health: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Health and Design (pp. 49–59). Stockholm, Sweden: Svensk Byggtjänst.

30.

Ulrich

R. S.

Simons

R. F.

Losito

B. D.

Fiorito

Miles

M. A.

Zelson

(1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7

31.

Ulrich

R. S.

Simons

R. F.

Miles

M. A.

(2003). Effects of environmental simulations and television on blood donor stress. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 20, 38–47. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030641

32.

van den Berg

A. E.

Koole

S. L.

van der Wulp

N. Y.

(2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 135–146. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00111 -1

33.

Velarde

M. D.

Fry

Tveit

(2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes-Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001

34.

Vincent

Battisto

Grimes

McCubbin

(2010). The effects of nature images on pain in a simulated hospital patient room. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3, 42–55. doi:10.1177/193758671000300306