Is Goniometry Suitable for Measuring Ankle Range of Motion in Female Ballet Dancers? An Initial Comparison With Radiographic Measurement

Abstract

Female ballet dancers require extreme ankle motion to attain the demi-plié (weight-bearing full dorsiflexion [DF]) and en pointe (weight-bearing full plantar flexion [PF]) positions of ballet. However, techniques for assessing this amount of motion have not yet received sufficient scientific scrutiny. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine possible differences between weight-bearing goniometric and radiographic ankle range of motion measurements in female ballet dancers. Ankle range of motion in 8 experienced female ballet dancers was assessed by goniometry and 2 radiographic measurement methods. The latter were performed on 3 mediolateral x-rays, in demi-plié, neutral, and en pointe positions; one of them used the same landmarks as goniometry. DF values were not significantly different among the methods, but PF values were (P < .05). Not only was PF of the talocrural joint significantly less than the other 2 measurements (P < .001), PF from the goniometric method applied to the x-rays was significantly less than PF obtained from clinical goniometry (P < .05). These data provide insight into the extreme ankle and foot motion, particularly PF, required in female ballet dancers and suggest that goniometry may not be ideal for assessing ankle range of motion in these individuals. Therefore, further research is needed to standardize how DF and PF are measured in ballet dancers.

Level of Evidence: Diagnostic, Level I

Keywords

ankle foot dance goniometry lower extremity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Russell JA , McEwan IM , Koutedakis Y. , Wyon MA Clinical anatomy and biomechanics of the ankle in dance. J Dance Med Sci. 2008;12:75-82.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Joint Motion: Method of Measuring and Recording. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1965.

Gerhardt JJ , Rippstein J. Measuring and Recording of Joint Motion: Instrumentation and Techniques. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe & Huber; 1990.

Garrick JG , Requa R. Ballet injuries. An analysis of epidemiology and financial outcome. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:586-590.

Hamilton WG Foot and ankle injuries in dancers. Clin Sports Med. 1988;7:143-173.

Hagins M. The relationship between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurements of ankle dorsiflexion in dancers. Impulse. 1994;2:165-175.

Khan K. , Bennell K. , Ng S. , et al. Can 16-18-year-old elite ballet dancers improve their hip and ankle range of motion over a 12-month period? Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10:98-103.

Khan K. , Roberts P. , Nattrass C. , et al. Hip and ankle range of motion in elite classical ballet dancers and controls. Clin J Sport Med. 1997;7:174-179.

Liederbach M. General considerations for guiding dance injury rehabilitation. J Dance Med Sci. 2000;4:54-65.

10.

Hamilton WG , Hamilton LH , Marshall P. , Molnar M. A profile of the musculoskeletal characteristics of elite professional ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:267-273.

11.

Bonnin JG Injuries to the Ankle (facsimile of the 1950 edition). Darien, CT: Hafner; 1970.

12.

Siegler S. , Chen J. , Schneck CD The three-dimensional kinematics and flexibility characteristics of the human ankle and subtalar joints-part I: kinematics. J Biomech Eng . 1988;110:364-373.

13.

Russell JA , Shave RM , Kruse DW , Koutedakis Y. , Wyon M. Ankle and foot contributions to extreme plantar flexion and dorsiflexion in female ballet dancers. Foot Ankle Int. 2011 ;32(2):183-188.

14.

Russell JA , Kruse DW , Nevill AM , Koutedakis Y. , Wyon MA Measurement of the extreme ankle range of motion required by female ballet dancers. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010;3(6):324-330.

15.

Backer M. , Kofoed H. Passive ankle mobility. Clinical measurement compared with radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:696-698.

16.

Weseley MS , Koval R. , Kleiger B. Roentgen measurement of ankle flexion-extension motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;65:167-174.

17.

Lundberg A. , Goldie I. , Kalin B. , Selvik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle. 1989;9:194-200.

18.

Lundberg A. Kinematics of the ankle and foot: in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;60(suppl233):1-24.

19.

Sammarco GJ , Burstein AH , Frankel VH Biomechanics of the ankle: a kinematic study. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973;4: 75-96.

20.

Liederbach M. , Hiebert R. The relationship between eccentric and concentric measures of ankle strength and functional equinus in classical dancers. J Dance Med Sci. 1997;1:55-61.

21.

Reese NB , Bandy WD Joint Range of Motion and Muscle Length Testing. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier ; 2010.

22.

Magerkurth O. , Knupp M. , Ledermann H. , Hintermann B. Evaluation of hindfoot dimensions: a radiological study. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:612-616.

23.

Gentili A. , Masih S. , Yao L. , Seeger LL Pictorial review: foot axes and angles. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:968-974.

24.

Novella TM Simple techniques for quantifying choreographically essential foot and ankle extents of motion. J Dance Med Sci. 2004;8:118-122.

25.

Steinberg N. , Hershkovitz I. , Peleg S. , et al. Range of joint movement in female dancers and nondancers aged 8 to 16 years. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:814-823.

26.

Martin RL , McPoil TG Reliability of ankle goniometric measurements: a literature review. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:564-572.

27.

Elveru RA , Rothstein JM , Lamb RL Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: subtalar and ankle joint measurements . Phys Ther. 1988;68:672-677.

28.

Lohrer H. , Nauck T. , Arentz S. , Schöll J. Observer reliability in ankle and calcaneocuboid stress radiography. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1143-1149.

29.

Taranto MJ , Taranto J. , Bryant A. , Singer KP Radiographic investigation of angular and linear measurements including first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion and rearfoot to forefoot axis angle . J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44:190-199.

30.

Vito G. , Kalish S. Biomechanical radiographic evaluation. In: Donatelli RA , ed. The Biomechanics of the Foot and Ankle . 2nd ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1996:137-167.

31.

Kitaoka HB , Alexander IJ , Adelaar RS , Nunley JA , Myerson MS , Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349-353.

32.

Tochigi Y. , Suh JS , Amendola A. , Pedersen DR , Saltzman CL Ankle alignment on lateral radiographs. Part 1: sensitivity of measures to perturbations of ankle positioning. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:82-87.