Background. Chronic syndesmotic injury may cause long-term pain and reduced ankle function. Today, there is no consensus about the best surgical treatment of these injuries. We present the technique and results of revision and fixation with a suture button and a quadricortical screw. Methods. Eleven patients treated for chronic syndesmotic injury were included. The patients completed questionnaires regarding ankle function, and computed tomography scans were obtained to evaluate tibiofibular distance and osteoarthritis. Complications were registered. Results. At mean 45 months follow-up, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score was 87 points. There were 5 complications, including 3 hardware-related pain. The tibiofibular distance was significantly reduced with surgery. Seven patients had progression of osteoarthritis. Conclusions. Even though the majority of the patients had progression of radiological signs of osteoarthritis, the functional outcome after revision and fixation with a suture button and a quadricortical screw in chronic syndesmotic ruptures is good and comparable to the results presented in other studies.
Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series without control, technical note
HopkinsonWJSt PierrePRyanJBWheelerJH. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1990;10:325-330.
5.
SwordsMPSandsAShankJR. Late treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Foot Ankle Clin. 2017;22:65-75.
6.
LeedsHCEhrlichMG. Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:490-503.
7.
WeeningBBhandariM. Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:102-108.
8.
RamseyPLHamiltonW. Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:356-357.
9.
EspinosaNSmerekJPMyersonMS. Acute and chronic syndesmosis injuries: pathomechanisms, diagnosis and management. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11:639-657.
10.
SwitajPJMendozaMKadakiaAR. Acute and chronic injuries to the syndesmosis. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34:643-677.
11.
LubbertsBvan DijkPADCalderJDDiGiovanniCW. There is no best surgical treatment for chronic isolated syndesmotic instability: a systematic review. J ISAKOS Joint Disord Orthop Sports Med. 2016;1:250-256.
12.
van den BekeromMPde LeeuwPAvan DijkCN. Delayed operative treatment of syndesmotic instability. Current concepts review. Injury. 2009;40:1137-1142.
13.
HarperMC. Delayed reduction and stabilization of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:15-18.
14.
SchuberthJMJenningsMMLauAC. Arthroscopy-assisted repair of latent syndesmotic instability of the ankle. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:868-874.
15.
WagenerMLBeumerASwierstraBA. Chronic instability of the anterior tibiofibular syndesmosis of the ankle. Arthroscopic findings and results of anatomical reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:212.
16.
YasuiYTakaoMMiyamotoWInnamiKMatsushitaT. Anatomical reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament for chronic disruption of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:691-695.
17.
GrassRRammeltSBiewenerAZwippH. Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:392-397.
MorrisMWRicePSchneiderTE. Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis reconstruction using a free hamstring autograft. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:506-511.
20.
KatznelsonALinEMilitianoJ. Ruptures of the ligaments about the tibio-fibular syndesmosis. Injury. 1983;15:170-172.
21.
OlsonKMDairykoGHJrToolanBC. Salvage of chronic instability of the syndesmosis with distal tibiofibular arthrodesis: functional and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:66-72.
22.
ColcucCFischerSColcucS, et al. Treatment strategies for partial chronic instability of the distal syndesmosis: an arthroscopic grading scale and operative staging concept. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136:157-163.
23.
RyanPMRodriguezRM. Outcomes and return to activity after operative repair of chronic latent syndesmotic instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37:192-197.
24.
van DijkCNScholteD. Arthroscopy of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:90-96.
25.
KitaokaHBAlexanderIJAdelaarRS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:187-188.
26.
MartinRLIrrgangJJBurdettRGContiSFVan SwearingenJM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:968-983.
27.
GarrowAPPapageorgiouACSilmanAJThomasEJaysonMIMacfarlaneGJ. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain. Pain. 2000;85:107-113.
28.
OlerudCMolanderH. A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103:190-194.
29.
LepojarviSPakarinenHSavolaOHaapeaMSequeirosRBNiinimakiJ. Posterior translation of the fibula may indicate malreduction: CT study of normal variation in uninjured ankles. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:205-209.
30.
NaultMLHebert-DaviesJLaflammeGYLeducS. CT scan assessment of the syndesmosis: a new reproducible method. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:638-641.
31.
ElgafyHSemaanHBBlessingerBWassefAEbraheimNA. Computed tomography of normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:559-564.
32.
KellgrenJHLawrenceJS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494-502.
33.
HanSHLeeJWKimSSuhJSChoiYR. Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:336-342.
34.
SchneiderWJurenitschS. Normative data for the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes clinical rating system. Int Orthop. 2016;40:301-306.
35.
HuntKJHurwitD. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e1181-e1189.
36.
MathenyLClantonTGittnerKHardingJ. Normative values for commonly reported outcome measures in the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2018;3(2). doi:10.1177/2473011418S00011
37.
GarrattAMNaumannMGSigurdsenUUtvagSEStavemK. Evaluation of three patient reported outcome measures following operative fixation of closed ankle fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19:134.
38.
DawsonJBollerIDollH, et al. Factors associated with patient satisfaction with foot and ankle surgery in a large prospective study. Foot (Edinb). 2012;22:211-218.
39.
Ogilvie-HarrisDJReedSC. Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: diagnosis and treatment by arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:561-568.
40.
WikeroyAKHoinessPRAndreassenGSHellundJCMadsenJE. No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:17-23.
41.
NaqviGACunninghamPLynchBGalvinRAwanN. Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2828-2835.
42.
AndersenMRDiepLMFrihagenFHellundJCMadsenJEFigvedW. The importance of syndesmotic reduction on clinical outcome after syndesmosis injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:397-403.
43.
LubbekeASalvoDSternRHoffmeyerPHolzerNAssalM. Risk factors for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: an eighteen year follow-up study. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1403-1410.
44.
ParlamasGHannonCPMurawskiCD, et al. Treatment of chronic syndesmotic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:1931-1939.
45.
GiebelGDMeyerCKoebkeJGiebelG. The arterial supply of the ankle joint and its importance for the operative fracture treatment. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19:231-235.
46.
BrownKWMorrisonWBSchweitzerMEParelladaJANothnagelH. MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:131-136.
47.
DikosGDHeislerJChoplinRHWeberTG. Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:433-438.
48.
MukhopadhyaySMetcalfeAGuhaAR, et al. Malreduction of syndesmosis—are we considering the anatomical variation?Injury. 2011;42:1073-1076.
