Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Other Electrophysical Modalities on Pain and Functionality in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026
Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Other Electrophysical Modalities on Pain and Functionality in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Plantar fasciitis (PF) is the leading cause of chronic heel pain in adults, impairing mobility and quality of life. Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) is widely used in physiotherapy for its practicality and cost-effectiveness. However, heterogeneity in study designs and protocols limits conclusions regarding its efficacy compared with other electrophysical modalities (EPMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the immediate effects of rESWT, alone or combined with conventional physiotherapy, versus other EPMs, focusing on pain and functional outcomes.
Methods
A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEDro was conducted up to April 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rESWT, alone or combined with non-electrophysical interventions, versus other EPMs in adults with PF. Pain intensity and functional disability were the primary outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, with sensitivity analyses conducted according to outcome type and comparator. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Results
Fourteen RCTs (n = 797) were included, of which 12 contributed to the meta-analysis. Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy did not demonstrate superiority over other EPMs for pain reduction (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.39 to 0.33) or functional improvement (SMD = −0.11; 95% CI: −0.47 to 0.25). Low-level laser therapy showed small but statistically significant advantages over rESWT for functional outcomes. Overall risk of bias (RoB) was high across most studies.
Conclusions
Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy, alone or combined with physical therapy, does not appear superior to other EPMs for PF. The high heterogeneity and overall elevated RoB limit the certainty of these findings, highlighting the need for high-quality trials to guide clinical recommendations.
LandorfKBKaminskiMRMunteanuSE, et al. Health-related quality of life is substantially worse in individuals with plantar heel pain. Sci Rep. 2022;12:15652.
2.
RasenbergNBierma-ZeinstraSMBindelsPJvan der LeiJvan MiddelkoopM. Incidence, prevalence, and management of plantar heel pain: a retrospective cohort study in Dutch primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(688):e801-e808.
NahinRL. Prevalence and pharmaceutical treatment of plantar fasciitis in United States adults. J Pain. 2018;19(8):885-896.
5.
GoffJDCrawfordR. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84:676-682.
6.
TsengW-CChenY-CLeeT-M, et al. Plantar fasciitis: an updated review. J Med Ultrasound. 2023;31:268-274.
7.
La PortaGALa FataPC. Pathologic conditions of the plantar fascia. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2005;22:1-9.
8.
LemontHAmmiratiKMUsenN. Plantar fasciitis: a degenerative process (fasciosis) without inflammation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93(3):234-237.
9.
KhammasASAMahmudRHassanHAIbrahimIMohammedSS. An assessment of plantar fascia with ultrasound findings in patients with plantar fasciitis: a systematic review. J Ultrasound. 2023;26(1):13-38.
10.
Thong-OnSBovonsunthonchaiSVachalathitiRIntiravoranontWSuwannaratSSmithR. Effects of strengthening and stretching exercises on the temporospatial gait parameters in patients with plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Rehabil Med. 2019;43(6):662-676.
11.
LeeWCWongWYKungELeungAK. Effectiveness of adjustable dorsiflexion night splint in combination with accommodative foot orthosis on plantar fasciitis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(10):1557-1564.
12.
SeligmanDARDawsonDStreinerDLSeligmanDJDavisA. Treating heel pain in adults: a randomized controlled trial of hard vs modified soft custom orthotics and heel pads. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(3):363-370.
13.
DonleyBGMooreTSferraJGozdanovicJSmithR. The efficacy of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication (NSAID) in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(1):20-23.
14.
ChenC-MLeeMLinC-H, et al. Comparative efficacy of corticosteroid injection and non-invasive treatments for plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:4033.
15.
MorrisseyDCotchettMSaid J’BariA, et al. Management of plantar heel pain: a best practice guide informed by a systematic review, expert clinical reasoning and patient values. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(19):1106-1118.
16.
ZhangXMaY. Global trends in research on extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) from 2000 to 2021. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24:312.
17.
AuerspergVTriebK. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an update. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5:584-592.
18.
ChengJHWangCJ. Biological mechanism of shockwave in bone. Int J Surg. 2015;24(pt B):143-146.
CharlesRFangLZhuRWangJ. The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1193835.
21.
Cortés-PérezIMoreno-MontillaLIbáñez-VeraAJDíaz-FernándezÁObrero-GaitánELomas-VegaR. Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, compared to corticosteroid injections, on pain, plantar fascia thickness and foot function in patients with plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2024;38(8):1023-1043.
22.
DaherMCovarrubiasOHerberAOhIGianakosAL. Platelet-rich plasma vs extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis at 3-6 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Foot Ankle Int. 2024;45(7):796-803.
23.
LippiLFolliAMoalliS, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with plantar fasciopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024;60(5):832-846.
24.
Simental-MendíaMSimental-MendíaLESánchez-GarcíaA, et al. Effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on plantar fascia thickness in plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024;144(8):3503-3516.
25.
TungWSDaherMCovarrubiasOHerberAGianakosAL. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(4):283-290.
26.
ChangKVChenSYChenWS, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Focused Shock Wave Therapy of Different Intensity Levels and Radial Shock Wave Therapy for Treating Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2012. Accessed November 5, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK109267/
27.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
28.
OuzzaniMHammadyHFedorowiczZ, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210.
29.
SterneJACSavovićJPageMJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
30.
McGuinnessLAHigginsJPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021;12(1):55-61.
31.
PrasadM. Introduction to the GRADE tool for rating certainty in evidence and recommendations. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024;25:101484.
32.
HozoSPDjulbegovicBHozoI. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:1-10.
33.
WanXWangWLiuJ, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135.
34.
HigginsJPTAltmanDGGøtzschePC, et al. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
35.
AkinogluBKöseNKirdiN, et al. Comparison of the acute effect of radial shock wave therapy and ultrasound therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled study. Pain Med. 2017;18:2443-2452.
36.
AkınoğluBKöseN. A comparison of the acute effects of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and exercise therapy in plantar fasciitis. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018;14(2):306-312.
37.
CinarESaxenaSUygurF. Combination therapy versus exercise and orthotic support in the management of pain in plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(4):406-414.
38.
DedesVStergioulasAKipreosGDedeAMMitseasAPanoutsopoulosGI. Effectiveness and safety of shockwave therapy in tendinopathies. Mater Sociomed. 2018;30(2):131-146.
39.
FoudaKZAliZAElshorbagyRT, et al. Effect of radial shock wave and ultrasound therapy combined with traditional physical therapy exercises on foot function and dorsiflexion range in plantar fasciitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27:3823-3832.
40.
GreccoMVBrechGCGreveJM. One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy. Clinics. 2013;68(8):1089-1095.
41.
GreveJMGreccoMVSantos-SilvaPR. Comparison of radial shockwaves and conventional physiotherapy for treating plantar fasciitis. Clinics. 2009;64(2):97-103.
42.
HashmiRYousafMSArshadN, et al. Comparison between shockwave and ultrasound therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis. Rawal Med J. 2020;45:834-834.
43.
KonjenNNapnarkTJanchaiS. A comparison of the effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98 suppl 1:S49-S56.
44.
ThammajareeCTheapthongMPaleeP, et al. Effects of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus high intensity laser therapy in individuals with plantar fasciitis: a randomised clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2023;38:127.
45.
TimurtaşEÇinarESelçukH, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus low-level laser therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2024;114(4):22-95.
46.
UlusoyACerrahogluLOrgucS. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes of laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(4):762-767.
47.
Yinilmez SanmakÖDGeler KülcüDMesciNAltunokEÇ. Comparison of effects of low-level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical study. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;65(2):184-190.
48.
Zare BidokiMVafaeei NasabMRKhatibi AghdaA. Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy with extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of patients with plantar fasciitis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2024;49:147-155.
49.
LiXZhangLGuS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave, ultrasound, low-level laser therapy, noninvasive interactive neurostimulation, and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for treating plantar fasciitis. Medicine. 2018;97(43):e12819.
50.
GuimarãesJSArcanjoFLLeporaceG, et al. Effects of therapeutic interventions on pain due to plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2023;37(6):727-746.
51.
NaterstadIFJoensenJBjordalJM, et al. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in patients with lower extremity tendinopathy or plantar fasciitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e059479.
52.
ChowIHCheingGL. Comparison of different energy densities of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for the management of chronic heel pain. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(2):131-141.
53.
HausdorfJSchmitzCAverbeckBMaierM. [Molecular basis for pain mediating properties of extracorporeal shock waves]. Schmerz. 2004;18(6):492-497.
54.
HausdorfJLemmensMAHeckKDW, et al. Selective loss of unmyelinated nerve fibers after extracorporeal shockwave application to the musculoskeletal system. Neuroscience. 2008;155:138-144.
55.
OhtoriSInoueGMannojiC, et al. Shock wave application to rat skin induces degeneration and reinnervation of sensory nerve fibres. Neurosci Lett. 2001;315:57-60.
56.
RompeJDHopeCKüllmerK, et al. Analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on chronic tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:233-237.
57.
TakahashiNOhtoriSSaisuTMoriyaHWadaY. Second application of low-energy shock waves has a cumulative effect on free nerve endings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:315-319.
RamonSGleitzMHernandezLRomeroLD. Update on the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave treatment for myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia. Int J Surg. 2015;24(pt B):201-206.
60.
YooJIOhMKChunSWLeeSULeeCH. The effect of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of trapezius: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99(7):e19085.
61.
RoerdinkRLDietvorstMvan der ZwaardBvan der WorpHZwerverJ. Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: systematic review. Int J Surg. 2017;46:133-145.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
