Enhancing English Fluency Through Small Talk: A Controlled Study Among Adult Thai Learners with No Formal English Education

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of structured small talk instruction on oral English fluency among adult Thai learners with no prior formal English education. Grounded in the theory of phatic communion and informed by andragogical and sociocultural learning principles, the study employed a quasi-experimental design with two groups: one receiving small talk–based instruction and another following a traditional textbook-based curriculum. Thirty-four adult female learners (aged 40–50) participated in 24 weeks of online instruction. Pre- and post-tests measured oral fluency across CEFR descriptors, complemented by learner satisfaction questionnaires. Results revealed significantly greater fluency gains and higher satisfaction levels in the small talk group (U = 0.000, p < .001, r = .85). The findings indicate that small talk promotes oral fluency, confidence, and motivation through socially meaningful communication. The study emphasizes the potential of small talk as a practical and transformative strategy for adult EFL learners in non-formal education contexts.

Keywords

adult education communicative learning oral fluency phatic communion small talk

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barron

Black

(2015). Constructing small talk in a learner-native speaker voice-based Telecollaboration: A focus on topic management and backchanneling. System, 48, 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.009

Cambridge University Press. (2008). face2face: Placement test teacher’s guide [Photocopiable materials]. Cambridge University Press.

Council of Europe. (2023). Common european framework for languages (CEFR): Qualitative aspects of spoken language use – Table 3 (CEFR 3.3): Common reference levels. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/table-3-cefr-3.3-common-reference-levels-qualitative-aspects-of-spoken

Coupland

(2000). Small talk. Pearson Education.

Doff

Thaine

Anderson

Edwards

Foster

Gairns

Godfrey

Lewis-Jones

McLarty

Oakley

Herbert Puchta

Redman

Rimmer

Stranks

(2022). Empower elementary (A2) student’s book (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Dooly

Tudini

(2016). “Now we are teachers”: The role of small talk in student language teachers’ telecollaborative task development. Journal of Pragmatics, 102, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.008

Garner

A. M.

Krishna

Sharma (2022). The social, intercultural, and transactional nature of small talk in the second language classroom. TESOL Communications, 1(2), 19–33. http://doi.org/10.46451/tc.20220202

Goh

C. C. M.

Burns

(2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.

Hagen

Park

(2016). We knew it all along! Using cognitive science to explain how Andragogy works. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2015-0081

10.

Holmes

(2000). Doing collegiality and keeping control: Small talk in the workplace. In Coupland

(Ed.), Small talk (pp. 32–61). Pearson.

11.

Hunter

(2012). Small talk: Developing fluency, accuracy, and complexity in speaking. ELT Journal, 66(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq093

12.

Knowles

M. S.

(1984). Andragogy in action. Applying modern principles of adult education. Jossey-Bass.

13.

Krashen

S. D.

(1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.

14.

Laver

(1975). Communicative functions of phatic communion. In Kendon

Harris

R. M.

Ritchie-Key

(Eds.), Organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction (pp. 215–238). Mouton.

15.

Leanos

Kürüm

Strickland-Hughes

C. M.

Ditta

A. S.

Nguyen

Felix

Yum

Rebok

G. W.

(2023). The impact of learning multiple real-world skills on cognitive abilities and functional independence in healthy older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, 78(8), 1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad053

16.

Luk

(2004). The dynamics of classroom small talk. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.5070/L4142005072.

17.

Malinowski

([1923] 1972). Phatic communion. In Coupland

(Ed.), Small talk (pp. 9–18). Pearson. (Original work published 1923).

18.

Mezirow

(1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

19.

Mugford

Borda

Espinoza

M. V.

Ramos

A. M.

Daniela, Mayoral

D. A. S.

(2024). Teaching meaningful EFL small talk: Exploration, supportiveness, and celebration. MEXTESOL, 48(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v48n1-4

20.

Nation

I. S. P.

Newton

(2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.

21.

Pauwels

Chalavi

Swinnen

S. P.

(2018). Aging and brain plasticity. Aging, 10(8), 1789–1790. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101514

22.

Prasetianto

(2019). Information gap: Speaking fluently is better in the EFL context. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 1(2), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v1i2.287

23.

Richards

J. C.

(2014, January 9). Teaching ‘small talk’. Oxford University Press ELT. https://teachingenglishwithoxford.oup.com/2014/01/09/teaching-small-talk/

24.

Schneider

K. P.

(1988). Small talk: Analysing phatic discourse. Hitzeroth.

25.

Snow

(2002). Looking closely at second language learning: An interview with Shattuck Professor Catherine Snow. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved October 1, 2002, from https://www.vllc.com.au/mind-blog/age-and-learning-a-language

26.

Vygotsky

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press

27.

Wahyunich

(2024). The implementation of small talk strategy in improving students’ speaking skills [Other thesis, UIN Ar-Raniry Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan]. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/36700