Toward a National Pangolin Conservation Action Plan: A Workshop to Build Capacity and a Policy Pathway in Tanzania

Abstract

Background and Research Aims

Pangolins are the most trafficked mammals globally; while engaging local community in conservation efforts is important, wildlife management personnel play a critical role in pangolin conservation. However, there is a notable gap in pangolin knowledge and practical expertise amongst Tanzanian professionals. Our study aimed to strengthen the capacity of Tanzanian wildlife management personnel to respond effectively to pangolin conservation challenges through collaborative learning and relationship-building.

Methods

We conducted a two-day participatory workshop involving wildlife management personnel from various agencies across Tanzania. The workshop focused on: knowledge development on pangolin biology and ecology; identification of prevailing threats and conservation actions; and, the development of provisional standard operating procedures.

Results

The workshop led to enhancing participants’ understanding of Tanzanian pangolins and their conservation needs, including ongoing professional training to address illegal trafficking and animal care; support for ongoing, timely communications; formalizing policy guidance; and, advancing recommendations for a national conservation action plan.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that fostering collaboration and building capacity amongst wildlife management personnel is essential for effective pangolin conservation in Tanzania. Expert input and multi-level engagement contributed to the development of strategic recommendations and practical tools that can be used to advance local conservation efforts and a national pangolin conservation agenda.

Implications for Conservation

Strengthening the skills and coordination of wildlife management personnel can significantly improve pangolin conservation outcomes. Our approach offers a practical framework for other conservationists facing similar challenges in governance. We suggest future efforts focus on: establishing robust communication networks to share accurate, timely information based on standardized policies and procedures; institutionalize professional development and ongoing training programs to ensure best practices and new techniques are utilized for pangolins and people; and, continue to enhance community engagement to support pangolin conservation at local and national levels.

Keywords

collaboration conservation engagement pangolin Tanzania wildlife workshop

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali

Abe

Pek Khiok

A. L.

Arshad

A. H. H. A.

Krajangdara

(2017). Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Sharks, Rays, and Skates Data Collection in the Southeast Asian Waters. Accessed on 14th November 2025 via https://repository.seafdec.org/handle/20.500.12066/1269

Bauer

Dickman

Chapron

Oriol-Cotterill

Nicholson

S. K.

Sillero-Zubiri

Hunter

Lindsey

Macdonald

D. W.

(2022). Threat analysis for more effective lion conservation. Oryx, 56(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605320000253

Bhandari

Dhami

Mahatara

Neupane

Gosai

Udaya

Phuyal

Ghimire

(2025). Habitat and Anthropogenic Determinants of Chinese Pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) Burrow Occupancy in Udayapur, Eastern Nepal: Implications for Site-Specific Conservation. Ecology and Evolution, 15(6), e71493. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71493

Bodin

Ö.

Crona

B. I.

(2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–01. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brittain

Ibbett

de Lange

Dorward

Hoyte

Marino

Milner-Gulland

E. J.

Newth

Rakotonarivo

Veríssimo

Lewis

(2020). Ethical considerations when conservation research involves people. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13464.

Burton

L. O.

O'Gorman

(2023). Transforming Engagement through Authentic Collaboration: Transdisciplinary Learning for Design Students and Preservice Teachers. In Contemporary Design Education in Australia (pp. 112-132). Intellect.

Capitani

Kariuki

R. W.

Marucco

(2024). Editorial: Impacts of people’s engagement in nature conservation. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2024.1521270

Challender

D.W.S.

Waterman

Ballie

J.E.M.

(2014). Scaling up pangolin conservation. IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group Conservation Action Plan. Zoological Society of London, UK. Accessed on 14th December 2025 via https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2014-062.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

10.

Challender

D. W.

Heinrich

Shepherd

C. R.

Katsis

L. K.

(2020). International Trade and Trafficking in Pangolins, 1900–2019. In pangolins (pp. 259-276). Academic Press.

11.

Microsoft Copilot (2025). [Large language model]. https://copilot.microsoft.com

12.

de Vos

Preiser

Masterson

(2021). Participatory data collection. In, Biggs

de Vos

Preiser

Clements

Maciejewski

Schlüter

(Eds.). The Routledge handbook of research methods for social-ecological systems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021339.

13.

Dietsch

A. M.

Wald

D. M.

Stern

M. J.

Tully

(2021). An understanding of trust, identity, and power can enhance equitable and resilient conservation partnerships and processes. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.421

14.

Ferraz

K. M. P. M. D. B.

Morato

R. G.

Bovo

A. A. A.

da Costa

C. O. R.

Ribeiro

Y. G. G.

de Paula

R. C.

Traylor‐Holzer

(2020). Bridging the gap between researchers, conservation planners, and decision-makers to improve species conservation decision‐making. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(2), e330.

15.

Foley

Lobora

De Luca

Msuha

Davenport

T. R.

Durant

S. M.

(2014). A field guide to the larger mammals of Tanzania (Vol. 90). Princeton University Press.

16.

Gonzalez-Urango

Ligardo-Herrera

Jacome-Enriquez

Gómez-Navarro

(2025). Designing participatory planning processes for protected areas and promoting the social and economic development of stakeholders involved: the case of Cotopaxi National Park (PNC) in Ecuador. Regional Environmental Change, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-025-02376-y

17.

Guerrero

A. M.

Mcallister

R. R. J.

Wilson

K. A.

(2015). Achieving Cross-Scale Collaboration for Large-Scale Conservation Initiatives. Conservation Letters, 8(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12112.

18.

Hughes

Elmeligi

Morehouse

(2022). Conservation through connection: Approaches to engaging communities in applied grizzly bear research. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 3, 913668.

19.

IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group, Fauna & Flora, and USAID - West Africa Biodiversity and Low Emissions Development . (2024). West Africa Regional Pangolin Conservation Action Plan 2026-2056. IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group, ℅ Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.

20.

Khatiwada

A. P.

Wright

Kunkel

Khatiwada

M. P.

Waterman

Bhattarai

Baral

H. S.

Pokheral

C. P.

Dalerum

(2022). Human influence on burrow activity of the Chinese pangolin in Nepal. Wildlife Research, 50(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR21024

21.

Kicheleri

R. P.

Hughes

Kimaro

M. H.

Mgeni

C. P.

Chilagane

N. A.

Mrosso

H. T.

Chidodo

S. J.

Msigwa

F. F.

Kimambo

E. A.

Kangile

R. J.

Bulenga

G. B.

Warbington

(2025). Local Ecological Knowledge Insights Into the Distribution and Activity Patterns of Temminck’s Pangolin in Ruaha Landscape, Tanzania. Ecology and Evolution, 15(8), e71987. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71987

22.

Knight

Cannia

Doetsch

Fleming

Grimm

Heinze

Kruk

J. V. D.

(2013). The state of the science and vision of the future: Report from the Hydrogeophysics Workshop. The Leading Edge, 32(7), 814-818.

23.

Leguia-Cruz

Cerda

Ortiz-Cubillos

Mansilla-Quiñones

Moreira-Muñoz

(2024). Enhancing participatory governance in biosphere reserves through co-creation of transdisciplinary and intergenerational knowledge. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1266440.

24.

Marchini

Ferraz

K. M. P. M. B.

Foster

Reginato

Kotz

Barros

Zimmermann

Macdonald

D. W.

(2021). Planning for Human-Wildlife Coexistence: Conceptual Framework, Workshop Process, and a Model for Transdisciplinary Collaboration. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.752953.

25.

Margules

Boedhihartono

A. K.

Langston

J. D.

Riggs

R. A.

Sari

D. A.

Sarkar

Winarni

N. L.

(2020). Transdisciplinary science for improved conservation outcomes. Environmental Conservation, 47(4), 224-233.

26.

Margules

C. R.

Pressey

R. L.

(2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405(6783), 243-253.

27.

Mbanze

A. A.

Ribeiro

N. S.

da Silva

C. V.

Santos

J. L.

(2019). An expert-based approach to assess the potential for local people engagement in nature conservation: the case study of the Niassa National Reserve in Mozambique. Journal for Nature Conservation, 52, 125759.

28.

Mgeni

C. P.

Kicheleri

R. P.

Mauya

Msigwa

F. F.

Chidodo

S. J.

Hughes

Kimaro

M. H.

(2024). Illegal harvest, use, and trade in Temminck’s pangolins by communities adjacent to Ruaha National Park, Tanzania. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2024.2435298

29.

Nenadovic

Mateja

(2015). Participation for Conservation: The Role of Social Capital in Multi-level Governance of Small-scale Fisheries. Dissertation, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/9913.

30.

Nixon

Pietersen

Challender

Hoffmann

Godwill Ichu

Bruce

Ingram

D.J.

Matthews

Shirley

M.H.

(2019). Smutsia gigantea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T12762A123584478. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T12762A123584478.en. Accessed on 09 November 2024.

31.

Ostermann-Miyashita

E.-F.

Pernat

König

H. J.

(2021). Citizen science as a bottom-up approach to address human–wildlife conflicts: From theories and methods to practical implications. Conservation Science & Practice, 3(2), e385. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.385

32.

Pietersen

Jansen

Connelly

(2019). Smutsia temminckii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T12765A123585768. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T12765A123585768.en. Accessed on 09 November 2024.

33.

Pietersen

Moumbolou

Ingram

D.J.

Soewu

Jansen

Sodeinde

Keboy Mov Linkey Iflankoy

Challender

Shirley

M.H.

(2019). Phataginus tricuspis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T12767A123586469. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T12767A123586469.en. Accessed on 09 November 2024.

34.

Pomeranz

Jones

Paulsen

(2021). Information flows in conservation networks: Leveraging stakeholder communication for effective governance. Environmental Management, 67(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01400-6

35.

Pomeranz

F.E.

Hare

Decker

J.D.

Forstchen

B.A.

Jacobson

A.C.

Christian

Smith

A.C.

Schiavone

V. M.

(2021). Successful Wildlife Conservation Requires Good Governance. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.753289

36.

Pound

Redpath

S. M.

Gutierrez

R. J.

Wood

K. A.

Young

J. C.

Evely

Reed

(2015). Designing and facilitating consensus-building: Keys to success. In Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating Towards Solutions (pp. 240–256). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084574.018

37.

Prediger

(2023). The Nyae Nyae Pangolin Project: Benefitting people and pangolins. Conservation Namibia. Available: https://conservationnamibia.com/articles/nyae-nyae-pangolin-project.php.

38.

Prell

Hubacek

Reed

(2009). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and natural resources, 22(6), 501-518.

39.

Przesdzink

Herzog

L. M.

Fiebelkorn

(2021). Combining Stakeholder- and Social Network- Analysis to Improve Regional Nature Conservation: A Case Study from Osnabrück, Germany. Environmental Management, 69(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01564-w

40.

Rose

D.C.

Evans

M.C.

Jarvis

R.M.

(2020). Effective engagement of conservation scientists with decision-makers. In: Sutherland

W.J.

Brotherton

P.N.M.

Davies

Z.G.

Ockendon

Pettorelli

Vickery

J.A.

, eds. Conservation Research, Policy and Practice. Ecological Reviews. Cambridge University Press; 2020:162-182.

41.

Rust

N. A.

Abrams

Challender

D. W. S.

Chapron

Ghoddousi

Glikman

J. A.

Gowan

C. H.

Hughes

Rastogi

Said

Sutton

Taylor

Thomas

Unnikrishnan

Webber

A. D.

Wordingham

Hill

C. M.

(2017). Quantity Does Not Always Mean Quality: The Importance of Qualitative Social Science in Conservation Research. Society & Natural Resources, 30(10), 1304–1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1333661

42.

Saif

Keane

Staddon

(2022). Making a case for the consideration of trust, justice, and power in conservation relationships. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13903

43.

Schwartz

M. W.

Cook

C. N.

Pressey

R. L.

Pullin

A. S.

Runge

M. C.

Salafsky

Williamson

M. A.

(2018). Decision Support Frameworks and Tools for Conservation. Conservation Letters, 11(2), e12385.

44.

Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute . (2020). Conduct of Wildlife Research Regulations. Accessed on 6th March 2025: https://www.tawiri.or.tz/tanzania-wildlife-research-institute-conduct-of-wildlife-research-regulations/

45.

Tinsman

J. C.

Gruppi

Bossu

C. M.

Prigge

T. L.

Harrigan

R. J.

Zaunbrecher

Smith

T. B.

(2023). Genomic analyses reveal poaching hotspots and illegal trade in pangolins from Africa to Asia. Science, 382(6676), 1282-1286.

46.

Treves

Wallace

R. B.

White

(2009). Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts. Conservation Biology, 23(6), 1577-1587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01242.x

47.

Willcox

Nash

H. C.

Trageser

Kim

H. J.

Hywood

Connelly

(2019). Evaluating methods for detecting and monitoring pangolin populations. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17, e00539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00539.

48.

Winton

Chabot

Zajac

Wallace

Williams

Forbes

(Eds.). (2025). Furbish’s lousewort (Pedicularis furbishiae) ex situ conservation planning workshop: Final report. IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group – Regional Resource Center Canada. https://wildlifepreservation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Final_Furbishs-Lousewort-Ex-Situ-Conservation-Planning-Workshop-Report_Jan-31-2025-compressed.pdf

49.

Young

J. C.

Jordan

Searle

K. R.

Butler

Chapman

D. S.

Simmons

Watt

A. D.

(2013). Does stakeholder involvement benefit biodiversity conservation? Biological Conservation, 158, 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.018