Jokering Bodies

Abstract

This article brings forth the difficulties and possibilities of enacting the role of “Joker” from Boal’s (1979) Joker System—formerly called the poetics of the oppressed. The authors acknowledge jokering as an apprehensive performance of brokering, of bodies that matter and are matter, that can provoke anti-oppressive actions and reinscribe oppressions. As such, four backdrops are engaged to further the methodological, theoretical, and curricular/pedagogical force of jokering as a performance that unsettles the status quo: Latina/Chicana feminist theories used in mentoring, performance-based action research with middle-school students, professional leadership development for schools, and socio-technological analysis with theatre in online/distance education. Each example from our praxis illustrates how the roles of emerging researcher, mentor-researcher, and researcher-practitioner are performed and troubled (jokered) from different disciplinary and theoretical perspectives to foster social justice praxis and outcomes.

Keywords

Boal leadership jokering anti-oppressive curriculum and pedagogy dialogical facilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam Perry

(2012). A silent revolution: ‘Image theatre’ as a system of decolonisation. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 17(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2012.648991

Anzaldua

(2015). Keating

A. L.

(Ed.), Light in the dark/luz en lo oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality (Latin America Otherwise). Duke University Press.

Bagley

C.,

Castro-Salazar

(2012). Critical arts-based research in education: Performing undocumented historias. British Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 239-260. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01411926.2010.538667.

Bazzul

(2015). Towards a politicized notion of citizenship for science education: Engaging the social through dissensus. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1051670

Boal

(1979/2000/2008). Theatre of the oppressed. Pluto Press.

Boal

(1995). The rainbow of desire: The Boal method of theatre and therapy. Routledge.

Boal

(1997) The Theatre of the Oppressed (Vol. 32). UNESCO Courier. http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A20099663/ITOF?u=tamp44898&sid=ITOF&xid=461b2a5 (accessed 25 Jan 2019).

Boal

(2002) Games for actors and non-actors. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994818

Boal

(2006) The aesthetics of the oppressed. Taylor & Francis. (Adrian Jackson. Routledge, Trans). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969830

10.

Boyd

(2012). The critical spirituality of Paulo Freire. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(6), 759–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2012.723051

11.

Burkhart

B. Y.

(2004). What coyote and thales can teach us: An outline of American Indian epistemology. In Waters

(Ed.), American Indian thought: Philosophical essays. (pp. 15–26). Wiley-Blackwell.

12.

Burleson

J. D.

(2003). Augusto Boal’s theatre of the oppressed in the public speaking and interpersonal communication classrooms [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University].

13.

Chen

(2019). Designing for networked collaborative discourse: An UnLMS approach. TechTrends, 63(2), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0284-7

14.

Collins

P. H.

(2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203900055

15.

Conquergood

(2002). Performance studies: Interventions and radical research. TDR/The Drama Review, 46(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/105420402320980550

16.

Dahya

(2017). Critical perspectives on youth digital media production: “voice” and representation in educational contexts. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1141785

17.

Denzin

N. K.

(2019). Answering the call. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(6), 529–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418806604

18.

Dillard

C. B.

(2000). The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(6), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050211565

19.

Dimitriadis

(2006). Pedagogy on the move: New intersections in (between) the educative and the performative. In Madison

Hamera

J. A.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of performance studies (pp. 296–308). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976145

20.

English

F. W.,

Ehrich

L. C.

(2016). Leading beautifully: Educational leadership as connoisseurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315780580.

21.

Freire

P.,

Macedo

(2005). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986103

22.

Grosfoguel

(2013). The structure of knowledge in westernised universities: Epistemic racism/sexism and the four genocides/epistemicides. Human Architecture: Journal of the sociology of self-knowledge, 11(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292896.

23.

Grosland

T. J.

(2019). Through laughter and through tears: Emotional narratives to antiracist pedagogy. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2018.1468750

24.

Guinier

L.,

Torres

(2002). The Miner’s canary: Enlisting race, resisting power, transforming democracy. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12q54

25.

Hewson

(2007). Emotions as data in the act of jokering Forum Theatre. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 8(18), 1-21. http://www.ijea.org/v8n18/.

26.

Hill

M. L.

(2018). “Thank you, Black Twitter”: State violence, digital counterpublics, and pedagogies of resistance. Urban Education, 53(2), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917747124

27.

Holling

M. A.,

Calafell

B. M.

(2007). Identities on stage and staging identities: ChicanoBrujo performances as emancipatory practices. Text and Performance Quarterly, 27(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930601046053

28.

Howard

L. A.

(2004). Speaking theatre/doing pedagogy: Re‐visiting theatre of the oppressed. Communication Education, 53(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000265161

29.

Hurtado

(2003). Theory in the flesh: Toward an endarkened epistemology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060617

30.

Katz-Buonincontro

(2011). Improvisational theatre as public pedagogy: A case study of “aesthetic” pedagogy in leadership development. Policy Futures in Education, 9(6), 769–779. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.6.769

31.

Lavender

(2017). The Internet, theatre, and time: Transmediating the theatron. Contemporary Theatre Review, 27(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2017.1343241

32.

LeVan

(2003). Spaces of movement: Performance, technology, transformation. American Communication Journal, 6(3), 1–8.

33.

Linds

W.,

(1998). A journey in metaxis: Theatre of the oppressed as enativist praxis. NADIE Journal, 22(2), 71-86. https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/975061/1/A_Journey_in_Metaxis_NADIE_Journal_Warren_Linds.pdf.

34.

Linds

Vettraino

(2008). Collective imagining: Collaborative story telling through image theater. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.2.400.

35.

López López

Nikey (2020). “Black girl magic, y’all can’t stand it, y’all can’t ban it”: Black girl curated curricula unsettling the conventional reason of school. Race Ethnicity and Education, 24(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2020.1718078

36.

Meyer

M. J.,

Macmillan

R. B.

(2003). Enlivening data: Using theatre to communicate educational research. Arts and Learning Research Journal, 19(1), 55–73.

37.

Meyer

Young

(2013). TAR (theatre as representation) as a provocative teaching tool in school administration: A dramatized inclusive classroom scenario. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 142, 69-89. https://cdm.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjeap/article/view/42847.

38.

Moraga

C.,

(1983). Loving in the War Years/Lo que nunca paso por sus labios. South End Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982254_15

39.

Moraga

C.,

Anzaldúa

(Eds.), (2015). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Suny Press.

40.

Natalier

K.,

Clarke

(2015). Online learning and the education encounter in a Neo-Liberal University: A case study. Higher Education Studies, 5(2), 62–73. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.5539/hes.v5n2p62

41.

Otoide

L.,

Alsop

(2015). Moments with Jacques Rancière: Sketches from a lived pedagogical experiment in an elementary science classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 234-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1062939.

42.

Panteli

N.,

Duncan

(2004). Trust and temporary virtual teams: Alternative explanations and dramaturgical relationships. Information Technology & People, 17(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840410570276

43.

Pressley

(2016, November 18). Notes on political theater: The perils of spectacle. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/theater_dance/notes-on-political-theater-the-perils-of-spectacle/2016/11/18/1c48c088-aa92-11e6-977a-1030f822fc35_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b5927b471372

44.

Rosa

R. D

(2009). What types of revolution are we rehearsing for?. In Apple

M. W.

Gandin

L. A.

(Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 240–253). Routledge.

45.

Sawyer

R. D.,

Norris

(2013). Duoethnography. Oxford University Press.

46.

Schutzman

(2006a). Ambulant pedagogy. In Madison

Hamera

J. A.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of performance studies (pp. 278–295). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976145.n15

47.

Schutzman

(2006b). Jok(er)ing: The joker runs wild. In Cohen-Cruz

Schutzman

(Eds.), A boal companion: Dialogues on theatre and cultural politics (pp. 133–145). Routledge.

48.

Selwyn

(2011). Editorial: In praise of pessimism-the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01215.x

49.

Shouse

(2005). Feeling, emotion, affect. M/C Journal, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2443

50.

Tolbert

S.,

Bazzul

(2017). Toward the sociopolitical in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9737-5

51.

Turkle

S.,

Papert

(1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 128-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/494648.

52.

Upadhyaya

K. T.,

Mallik

(2013). E-learning as a socio-technical system: An insight into factors influencing its effectiveness. Business Perspectives and Research, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2278533720130101

53.

Wallace

(2010). Facing “reality”: Including the emotional in school leadership programmes. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(5), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231011067758

54.

Zeidler

D. L.,

Nichols

B. H.

(2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684