Return to sport is widely utilized by sports medicine researchers and clinicians as a primary outcome of interest for successful recovery when working with young patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While return-to-sport outcomes are effective at tracking progress post-ACLR, they are limited because they do not necessarily capture physical activity (PA) engagement, which is important to maintain knee joint health and reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, there is a critical need (1) to describe current PA participation and measurement recommendations; (2) to appraise common PA measurement approaches, including patient-reported outcomes and device-based methodologies; and (3) to provide clinical recommendations for future evaluation.
Evidence Acquisition:
Reports of patient-reported or device-based PA in patients with ACL injury were acquired and summarized based on a PubMed search (2000 through July 2020). Search terms included physical activity OR activity AND anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL.
Study Design:
Clinical review.
Level of Evidence:
Level 5.
Results:
We highlight that (1) individuals with ACLR are 2.36 times less likely to meet the US Department of Health and Human Services PA recommendations even when reporting successful return to sport, (2) common patient-reported PA assessments have significant limitations in the data that can be derived, and (3) alternative patient-reported and device-based assessments may provide improved assessment of PA in this patient population.
Conclusion:
Clinicians and researchers have relied on return to sport status or self-reported PA participation via surveys. These approaches are not consistent with current recommendations for PA assessment and do not allow for comparison with contemporary PA recommendations or guidelines. Return to sport, patient-reported outcome measures, and device-based assessment approaches should be used in complementary manners to comprehensively assess PA participation after ACLR. However, appropriate techniques should be used when assessing PA in adult and adolescent populations.
AadlandEYlvisakerE.Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer in adults under free-living conditions. PloS One. 2015;10:e0134606.
2.
AdolphALPuyauMRVohraFANicklasTAZakeriIFButteNF.Validation of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for the assessment of physical activity in preschool children. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9:944-953.
3.
AmireaultSGodinGLacombeJSabistonCM.Validation of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire classification coding system using accelerometer assessment among breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9:532-540.
4.
ArdernCL.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—not exactly a one-way ticket back to the preinjury level: a review of contextual factors affecting return to sport after surgery. Sports Health. 2015;7:224-230.
5.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWebsterKE.Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1543-1552.
6.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWhiteheadTSWebsterKE.Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1549-1558.
7.
ArmstrongNWelsmanJR.The physical activity patterns of European youth with reference to methods of assessment. Sports Med. 2006;36:1067-1086.
8.
BaezSEHochMCHochJM.Psychological factors are associated with return to pre-injury levels of sport and physical activity after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:495-501.
9.
BellDRPfeifferKACadmus-BertramLA, et al. Objectively measured physical activity in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1893-1900.
10.
BianchimMSMcNarryMALarunLMackintoshKA; ActiveYouth SRC group ASSTMRC. Calibration and validation of accelerometry to measure physical activity in adult clinical groups: a systematic review. Prev Med Rep. 2019;16:101001.
11.
BodkinSGoetschiusJHertelJHartJ.Relationships of muscle function and subjective knee function in patients after ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2325967117719041.
12.
BriggsKKLysholmJTegnerYRodkeyWGKocherMSSteadmanJR.The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:890-897.
13.
Celis-MoralesCAPerez-BravoFIbanezLSalasCBaileyMEGillJM.Objectivevs.self-reported physical activity and sedentary time: effects of measurement method on relationships with risk biomarkers. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36345.
14.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health. BRFSS Prevalence & Trends Data 2015. Accessed May 31, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfssprevalence/
15.
CollinsNJMisraDFelsonDTCrossleyKMRoosEM.Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(suppl 11):S208-S228.
16.
DahmDLWulfCADajaniKADobbsRELevyBAStuartMA.Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients over 50 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1446-1450.
17.
DunnWRSpindlerKPConsortiumM.Predictors of activity level 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2040-2050.
18.
FabricantPDRoblesADowney-ZayasT, et al. Development and validation of a pediatric sports activity rating scale: the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS). Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2421-2429.
19.
FabricantPDSuryavanshiJRCalceiJGMarxRGWidmannRFGreenDW.The Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS): normative data. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:1228-1234.
20.
FakhouriTHHughesJPBurtVLSongMFultonJEOgdenCL. Physical activity in U.S. youth aged 12-15 years, 2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2014:1-8.
21.
FergusonTRowlandsAVOldsTMaherC.The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:42.
22.
FullerDColwellELowJ, et al. Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate: systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8:e18694.
23.
GodinGShephardRJ.A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10:141-146.
HochsmannCKnaierREymannJHintermannJInfangerDSchmidt-TrucksassA.Validity of activity trackers, smartphones, and phone applications to measure steps in various walking conditions. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28:1818-1827.
26.
Hubbard-TurnerTTurnerMJ.Physical activity levels in college students with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2015;50:742-747.
27.
IversenMDvon HeidekenJFarmerERihmJHeyworthBEKocherMS.Validity and comprehensibility of physical activity scales for children with sport injuries. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36:278-283.
28.
JassimSSDouglasSLHaddadFS.Athletic activity after lower limb arthroplasty: a systematic review of current evidence. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:923-927.
KellyLAMcMillanDGAndersonAFippingerMFillerupGRiderJ.Validity of actigraphs uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for assessment of physical activity in adults in laboratory conditions. BMC Med Phys. 2013;13:5.
31.
KingsleyMICNawaratneRO’HalloranPD, et al. Wrist-specific accelerometry methods for estimating free-living physical activity. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22:677-683.
32.
KuenzeCCadmus-BertramLPfiefferK, et al. Relationship between physical activity and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28:180-187.
33.
KuenzeCHertelJSalibaSDiduchDRWeltmanAHartJM.Clinical thresholds for quadriceps assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Sport Rehabil. 2015;24:36-46.
34.
KuenzeCLiseeCPfeifferKA, et al. Sex differences in physical activity engagement after ACL reconstruction. Phys Ther Sport. 2019;35:12-17.
35.
LeePHMacfarlaneDJLamTHStewartSM.Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115.
36.
LepleyLK.Deficits in quadriceps strength and patient-oriented outcomes at return to activity after ACL reconstruction: a review of the current literature. Sports Health. 2015;7:231-238.
37.
MarxRGStumpTJJonesECWickiewiczTLWarrenRF.Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:213-218.
38.
MatthewsCEAinsworthBEThompsonRWBassettDRJr.Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1376-1381.
39.
McPhailSMSchippersMMarshallALWaiteMKuipersP.Perceived barriers and facilitators to increasing physical activity among people with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative investigation to inform intervention development. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:2113-2122.
40.
MotlRWBollaertRESandroffBM.Validation of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire classification coding system using accelerometry in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63:77-82.
41.
NorteGESolaasHSalibaSAGoetschiusJSlaterLVHartJM.The relationships between kinesiophobia and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction differ by self-reported physical activity engagement. Phys Ther Sport. 2019;40:1-9.
42.
O’BrienMWWojcikWRFowlesJR.Correction: Medical-grade physical activity monitoring for measuring step count and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: validity and reliability study. JMIR mhealth uhealth. 2019;7:e12576.
43.
O’BrienMWWojcikWRFowlesJR.Medical-grade physical activity monitoring for measuring step count and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: validity and reliability study. JMIR mhealth uhealth. 2018;6:e10706.
44.
ParkWLeeVJKuBTanakaH.Effect of walking speed and placement position interactions in determining the accuracy of various newer pedometers. J Exer Sci Fitness. 2014;12:31-37.
45.
PiercyKLTroianoRPBallardRM, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320:2020-2028.
46.
PowellKEKingACBuchnerDM, et al. The Scientific Foundation for the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition.J Phys Act Health. 2018:1-11.
47.
RangulVHolmenTLKurtzeNCuypersKMidthjellK.Reliability and validity of two frequently used self-administered physical activity questionnaires in adolescents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:47.
48.
SallisJFSaelensBE.Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(suppl 2):1-14.
49.
SasakiJEJohnDFreedsonPS.Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14:411-416.
TanSHLauBPKhinLWLingarajK.The importance of patient sex in the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:242-254.
52.
TengmanEBrax OlofssonLNilssonKGTegnerYLundgrenLHagerCK.Anterior cruciate ligament injury after more than 20 years: I. Physical activity level and knee function. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:e491-e500.
53.
ToomeyCMWhittakerJLNettel-AguirreA, et al. Higher fat mass is associated with a history of knee injury in youth sport. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47:80-87.
54.
TothLPParkSSpringerCMFeyerabendMDSteevesJABassettDR.Video-recorded validation of wearable step counters under free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:1315-1322.
55.
TrostSGLoprinziPDMooreRPfeifferKA.Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1360-1368.
56.
Tudor-LockeCAinsworthBEThompsonRWMatthewsCE.Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:2045-2051.
van PoppelMNChinapawMJMokkinkLBvan MechelenWTerweeCB.Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2010;40:565-600.
59.
WagnerKJ3rdSabatinoMJZyndaAJ, et al. Activity measures in pediatric athletes: a comparison of the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale and Tegner Activity Level Scale. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48:985-990.
60.
WaldsteinWKolbitschPKollerUBoettnerFWindhagerR.Sport and physical activity following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:717-728.
61.
WebsterKEFellerJA.Expectations for return to preinjury sport before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:578-583.
62.
YangXChenJYZhaiYZhaoWH.A systematic review of evaluation studies on physical activity questionnaires for children and adolescents [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;53:1290-1295.
63.
ZahiriCASchmalzriedTPSzuszczewiczESAmstutzHC.Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:890-895.
64.
ZebisMKWarmingSPedersenMB, et al. Outcome measures after ACL injury in pediatric patients: a scoping review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7:2325967119861803.
