Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are relatively common in athletic populations, few studies have systematically reviewed graft choice in young women.
Objective:
To quantitatively and qualitatively examine reported outcomes for graft choice in women aged 25 years and younger undergoing primary ACL reconstruction.
Data Source:
A systematic review was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. An electronic search in the PubMed (includes MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases was completed using a combination of key terms.
Study Selection:
Studies were included if they reported graft choice outcomes in women aged 25 years and younger.
Study Design:
Systematic review.
Level of Evidence:
Level 4.
Data Extraction:
The following information was extracted: title, author, year of publication, number of female patients and age, graft type, follow-up, and patient-reported outcome measures. The following outcome scores were identified as being reported or not reported by each study: graft failure, contralateral ACL (CACL) rupture, IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee), graft survival (Kaplan-Meier), Lysholm, Tegner, KT-1000, kneeling pain, return to sport, and Lachman.
Results:
Of 1170 identified articles, 16 met inclusion criteria, reporting on 1385 female patients aged 25 years and younger. Comparison of 655 bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) versus 525 hamstring tendon (HT) autografts showed significant differences in mean failure rate between BPTB autografts (6.13% ± 2.58%) and HT autografts (17.35% ± 8.19%), P = 0.001. No statistically significant differences in CACL failure rates were found between BPTB autografts and HT autografts (P = 0.25). Pooled results for IKDC were possible in 3 of the HT autograft studies, showing a mean score of 88.31 (95% CI 83.53-93.08). Pooled Lysholm score results were possible in 2 of the HT autograft studies, showing a mean score of 93.46 (95% CI 91.90-95.01).
Conclusion:
In female patients aged 25 years and younger, BPTB autografts showed significantly less graft failure compared with HT autografts. However, BPTB autografts had comparable patient-reported outcomes compared with HT autografts with the available data. The overall state of evidence for graft choice in female patients aged 25 years and younger is low. Future studies should report statistics by age and sex to allow for further analysis of graft choice for this specific population that is known to be more vulnerable to ACL injury.
AhldénMSamuelssonKSernertNForssbladMKarlssonJKartusJ. The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2230-2235.
2.
Alentorn-GeliEMyerGSilversH, et al. Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:705-729.
3.
AndernordDDesaiNBjörnssonHYlanderMKarlssonJSamuelssonK. Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:121-127.
4.
AronowitzEGanleyTGoodeJGreggJMeyerJ. Anterior cruciate ligament in adolescents with open physes. Arthroscopy. 2000;28:168-175.
5.
AsturDCCachoeiraCMda Silva VieiraTDebieuxPKalekaCCCohenM. Increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery in paediatric verses adult population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:1362-1366.
6.
Barber-WestinSNoyesFR. One in 5 athletes sustain reinjury upon return to high-risk sports after ACL reconstruction: a systematic review in 1239 athletes younger than 20 years. Sports Health. 2020;12:587-597.
7.
BariéAKöpfMJaberA, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament graft choices. Am J Sports Med. 2018;48:1-8.
8.
BariéAKöpfMJaberA, et al. Long-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a press-fit quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19:368.
9.
BarrettAMCraftJAReplogleWHHydrickJMBarrettGR. Anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a comparison of graft type based on age and tegner activity level. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:2194-2198.
10.
BarrettGRNoojinFKHartzogCWNashCR. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: a comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:46-54.
11.
BiauDJTournouxCKatsahianSSchranzPJNizardRS. Bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2006;332:995-998.
12.
BoguszewskiDVCheungECJoshiNBMarkolfKLMcallisterDR. Male-female differences in knee laxity and stiffness: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2982-2987.
13.
BourkeHEGordonDJSalmonLJWallerALinklaterJPinczewskiLA. The outcome at 15 years of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft for “isolated” anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:630-637.
14.
BullerLTBestMJBaragaMGKaplanLD. Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sport Med. 2015;3:2325967114563664.
15.
CassardXCavaignacEMaubissonLBowenM. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children with a quadrupled semitendinosus graft. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34:70-77.
16.
CohenMFerrettiMQuarteiroM, et al. Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:831-838.
17.
DemangeMKCamanhoGL. Nonanatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-stranded semitendinosus grafts in children with open physes: minimum 15-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2926-2932.
18.
DodwellERLamontLEGreenDWPanTJMarxRGLymanS. 20 years of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in New York state. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:675-680.
19.
DooleyPJChanDSDaintyKNMohtadiNGWhelanDB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2:CD005960.
20.
DunnKLLamKCValovich McLeodTC. Early operative versus delayed or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in pediatric patients. J Athl Train. 2016;51:425-427.
21.
EkelandAEngebretsenLFenstadAMHeirS. Similar risk of ACL graft revision for alpine skiers, football and handball players: the graft revision rate is influenced by age and graft choice. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:33-38.
22.
FabricantPDKocherMS. Management of ACL injuries in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:600-612.
23.
ForsterMCForsterIW. Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2005;12:225-230.
24.
GablerCMJacobsCAHowardJSMattacolaCGJohnsonDL. Comparison of graft failure rate between autografts placed via an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique. Am J Sports Med. 2015;44:1069-1079.
25.
GianottiSMMarshallSWHumePABuntL. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:622-627.
26.
GifstadTFossOAEngebretsenL, et al. Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2319-2328.
27.
GolderSLokeYK. The performance of adverse effects search filters in medline and embase. Health Info Libr J. 2012;29:141-151.
28.
GuentherZDSwamiVDhillonSSJaremkoJL. Meniscal injury after adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injury: how long are patients at risk?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:990-997.
29.
GulottaLVRodeoSA. Biology of autograft and allograft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26:509-524.
30.
HerzogMMMarshallSWLundJLPateVMackCDSpangJT. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction among adolescent females in the United States, 2002 through 2014. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:808-810.
31.
HoBEdmondsEWChambersHGBastromTPPennockAT. Risk factors for early ACL reconstruction failure in pediatric and adolescent patients: a review of 561 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38:388-392.
32.
JanssenKWOrchardJWDriscollTRvan MechelenW. High incidence and costs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed in Australia from 2003-2004 to 2007-2008: time for an anterior cruciate ligament register by Scandinavian model?Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2012;22:495-501.
33.
KaedingCCPedrozaADReinkeEKHustonLJSpindlerKP. Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:1583-1590.
34.
KaedingCCSpindlerKPHustonLJZajichekA. ACL reconstruction in high school and college-aged athletes: does autograft choice affect recurrent ACL revision rates?Orthop J Sport Med. 2019;7(7_suppl5):2325967119S0028.
35.
KanePWWascherJDodsonCCHammoudSCohenSBCiccottiMG. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in skeletally mature patients aged 25 years or younger. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:3627-3633.
36.
KayJMemonMShahA, et al. Earlier anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with a decreased risk of medial meniscal and articular cartilage damage in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:3738-3753.
37.
KohlSStutzCDeckerS, et al. Mid-term results of transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children and adolescents. Knee. 2014;21:80-85.
38.
LarsonCMHeikesCSEllingsonCI, et al. Allograft and autograft transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: outcomes and complications. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:860-867.
MagnussenRAGrananLDunnWR, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in the United States and Norway. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:98-105.
41.
MaletisGBChenJInacioMCSFunahashiTT. Age-related risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 21,304 patients from the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:331-336.
42.
MascarenhasREricksonBJSayeghET, et al. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:364-372.
43.
MascarenhasRTranovichMJKropfEJFuFHHarnerCD. Bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2-10 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1520-1527.
44.
McGuireDAHendricksSD. Allograft tissue in ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009;17:224-233.
45.
MouarbesDMenetreyJMarotVCourtotLBerardECavaignacE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone–patellar tendon–bone and hamstring-tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:3531-3540.
46.
MurgierJPowellAYoungSClatworthyM. Effectiveness of thicker hamstring or patella tendon grafts to reduce graft failure rate in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:725-731.
47.
NelsonIChenJLoveRDavisBMaletisGFunahashiT. A comparison of revision and rerupture rates of ACL reconstruction between autografts and allografts in the skeletally immature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:773-779.
48.
PanicNLeonciniEDe BelvisGRicciardiWBocciaS. Evaluation of the endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83138.
PennockATJohnsonKPTurkRD, et al. Transphyseal ACL reconstruction in the skeletally immature: quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft. Orthop J Sport Med. 2019;7:2325967119872450.
51.
PerkinsCABuschMTChristinoMHerzogMMWillimonSC. Allograft augmentation of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts is associated with increased graft failure in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:1576-1582.
52.
PerssonAFjeldsgaardKGjertsenJE, et al. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:285-291.
53.
QuatmanCEFordKRMyerGDPaternoMVHewettTE. The effects of gender and maturational status on generalized joint laxity in young athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2008;11:257-263.
54.
RaadMThevenin LemoineCBérardELaumoneriePSalesdeGauzyJAccadbledF. Delayed reconstruction and high BMI z score increase the risk of meniscal tear in paediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:905-911.
55.
RaziMMoradiASafarcheratiA, et al. Allograft or autograft in skeletally immature anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation using both partial and complete transphyseal techniques. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:85.
56.
SalemHSKraeutlerMJCarterAHTjoumakarisFPFreedmanKB. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young females: a systematic review of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts. Orthopedics. 2019;42:E295-E304.
57.
SalemHSVarzhapetyanVPatelNDodsonCCTjoumakarisFPFreedmanKB. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young female athletes: patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:2086-2092.
58.
SalmonLJHeathEAkrawiHRoeJPLinklaterJPinczewskiLA. 20-Year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: the catastrophic effect of age and posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:531-543.
59.
SchuetteHBKraeutlerMJHouckDAMcCartyEC. Bone–patellar tendon–bone versus hamstring tendon autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Orthop J Sport Med. 2017;5:2325967117736484.
60.
ShakkedRWeinbergMCapoJJazrawiLStraussE. Autograft choice in young female patients: patella tendon versus hamstring. J Knee Surg. 2017;30:258-263.
61.
ShelbourneKDBennerRWGrayT. Return to sports and subsequent injury rates after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1395-1400.
62.
ShelbourneKDGrayTHaroM. Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:246-251.
63.
SpindlerKPHustonLJZajichekA, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in high school and college-aged athletes: does autograft choice influence anterior cruciate ligament revision rates?Am J Sports Med. 2020;48:298-309.
64.
StahlRJainSKLutzJ, et al. Osteoarthritis of the knee at 3.0 T: comparison of a quantitative and a semi-quantitative score for the assessment of the extent of cartilage lesion and bone marrow edema pattern in a 24-month longitudinal study. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:1315-1327.
65.
TanSLauBKhinLLingarajK. The importance of patient sex in the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:242-254.
66.
TepoltFAFeldmanLKocherMS. Trends in pediatric ACL reconstruction from the PHIS database. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38:e490-e494.
67.
ThompsonSMSalmonLJWallerALinklaterJRoeJPPinczewskiLA. Twenty-year outcome of a longitudinal prospective evaluation of isolated endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:3083-3094.
68.
TooleARIthurburnMPRauhMJHewettTEPaternoMVSchmittLC. Young athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction cleared for sports participation: how many actually meet recommended return-to-sport criterion cutoffs?J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47:825-833.
69.
VavkenPTepoltFAKocherMS. Concurrent meniscal and chondral injuries in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38:105-109.
70.
WallEJGhattasPJEismannEAMyerGDCarrP. Outcomes and complications after all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Orthop J Sport Med. 2017;5:2325967117693604.
71.
WebsterKEFellerJA. Exploring the high reinjury rate in younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2827-2832.
72.
WebsterKEFellerJA. Younger patients and men achieve higher outcome scores than older patients and women after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2472-2480.
73.
WebsterKEFellerJAWhiteheadTSMyerGDMeroryPB. Return to sport in the younger patient with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sport Med. 2017;5:2325967117703399.
74.
WernerBCYangSLooneyAMGwathmeyFW. Trends in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36:447-452.
75.
WigginsAJGrandhiRKSchneiderDKStanfieldDWebsterKEMyerGD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1861-1876.
76.
WildCYMunroBJSteeleJR. How young girls change their landing technique throughout the adolescent growth spurt. Am J Sports Med. 2015;44:1116-1123.
77.
WildCYSteeleJRMunroBJ. Musculoskeletal and estrogen changes during the adolescent growth spurt in girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:138-145.
