In soccer, the day of the week with the highest external load is match day (MD), with starters (>60 minutes per match) showing higher levels of physical fitness and seasonal high-intensity loading. It is necessary, therefore, to determine training strategies to reduce the differences between starters and nonstarters. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the external load of different training compensatory strategies with match external load in female nonstarters.
Hypothesis:
A strategy combining small-sided games (SSG) and running-based drills (RBD) would reproduce match demands, with RBD leading to greater high-intensity running and SSG leading to a greater number of accelerations and decelerations.
Study Design:
Descriptive and comparative study.
Level of Evidence:
Level 4.
Methods:
The training and match external load of 14 female players belonging to the same reserve squad of a Spanish First Division Club (Liga Reto Iberdrola) was registered. In the first session after the match (MD+1), nonstarters (<60 minutes in the match) performed 1 of 3 different compensatory strategies: RBD, SSG, or a mixed intervention combining the previous strategies (RBD+SSG). Starters carried out a recovery session.
Results:
A marked difference in load was observed between the compensatory training strategies and MD. In comparison with MD, RBD showed greater high-intensity and sprint distances and lower acceleration, SSG showed less high-intensity running and sprint distances, lower peak velocity, and greater acceleration, and RBD+SSG registered lower accelerations. In addition, nonstarters covered greater high-intensity running and sprint distances in RBD and achieved higher accelerations in SSG.
Conclusion:
RBD and SSG compensatory strategies could be recommended to nonstarter female soccer players in MD+1 to compensate for match external load deficits.
Clinical Relevance:
This study provides comprehensive information on the compensatory exercises of female soccer players, which can be useful for strength and conditioning coaches when developing recovery strategies during a microcycle.
AdeJDHarleyJABradleyPS. Physiological response, time-motion characteristics, and reproducibility of various speed-endurance drills in elite youth soccer players: small-sided games versus generic running. Int J Sport Physiol Perform. 2014;9(3):471-479.
2.
AndersonLOrmePDi MicheleR, et al. Quantification of seasonal-long physical load in soccer players with different starting status from the English premier league: implications for maintaining squad physical fitness. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(8):1038-1046.
3.
AndersonLOrmePDi MicheleR, et al. Quantification of training load during one-, two- and three-game week schedules in professional soccer players from the English Premier League: implications for carbohydrate periodisation. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(13):1250-1259.
4.
ArslanEOrerGEClementeFM. Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players. Biol Sport. 2020;37(2):165-173.
5.
Bastida CastilloAGomez CarmonaCDDe la Cruz SanchezEPino OrtegaJ. Accuracy, intra- and inter-unit reliability, and comparison between GPS and UWB-based position-tracking systems used for time-motion analyses in soccer. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018;18(4):450-457.
BradleyPVescoviJ. Velocity thresholds for women’s soccer matches: sex specificity dictates high-speed-running and sprinting thresholds-female athletes in motion (FAiM). Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(1):112-116.
8.
BuchheitMLacomeMCholleyYSimpsonBM. Neuromuscular responses to conditioned soccer sessions assessed via GPS-Embedded accelerometers: insights into tactical periodization. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(5):577-583.
9.
CastilloDRodriguez-FernandezANakamuraFY, et al. Influence of different small-sided game formats on physical and physiological demands and physical performance in young soccer players. J strength Cond Res. 2021;35(8):2287-2293.
10.
ClementeFMRamirez-CampilloRAfonsoJSarmentoH. Effects of small-sided games vs. running-based high-intensity interval training on physical performance in soccer players: a meta-analytical comparison. Front Physiol. 2021;12:642703.
11.
ClementeFMSarmentoHRabbaniANeils Van Der LindenCMIKargarfardMCostaIT. Variations of external load variables between medium- and large-sided soccer games in professional players. Res Sport Med. 2019;27(1):50-59.
12.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
13.
CurtisRMHugginsRABenjaminCL, et al. Seasonal accumulated workloads in collegiate men’s soccer: a comparison of starters and reserves. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(11):3184-3189.
14.
DalenTLoråsH. Monitoring training and match physical load in junior soccer players: starters versus substitutes. Sports (Basel). 2019;7(3):70.
15.
DatsonNDrustBWestonMJarmanIHLisboaPJGregsonW. Match physical performance of elite female soccer players during international competition. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(9):2379-2387.
16.
DolciFKildingAESpiteriT, et al. High-intensity interval training shock microcycle improves running performance but not economy in female soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2021;42(8):740-748.
17.
DudleyGAAbrahamWMTerjungRL. Influence of exercise intensity and duration on biochemical adaptations in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1982;53(4):844-850.
18.
FosterCFlorhaugJAFranklinJ, et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):109-115.
19.
GabbettTJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):273-280.
20.
GalloTFCormackSJGabbettTJLorenzenCH. Self-reported wellness profiles of professional Australian football players during the competition phase of the season. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(2):495-502.
21.
Gómez-CarmonaCDGamonalesJMPino-OrtegaJIbáñezSJ. Comparative analysis of load profile between small-sided games and official matches in youth soccer players. Sport (Basel, Switzerland). 2018;6(4):173.
22.
Hill-HaasSDawsonBImpellizzeriFMCouttsAJ. Physiology of small-sided games training in football: a systematic review. Sport Med. 2011;41(3):199-220.
23.
Hill-HaasSVCouttsAJRowsellGJDawsonBT. Generic versus small-sided game training in soccer. Int J Sport Med. 2009;30(9):636-642.
24.
JajtnerARHoffmanJRScanlonTC, et al. Performance and muscle architecture comparisons between starters and non-starters in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I women’s soccer. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(9):2355-2365.
25.
KöklüYCihanHAlemdaroğluUDellalAWongDP. Acute effects of small-sided games combined with running drills on internal and external loads in young soccer players. Biol Sport. 2020;37(4):375-381.
26.
Los ArcosAMendez-VillanuevaAMartínez-SantosR. In-season training periodization of professional soccer players. Biol Sport. 2017;34(2):149-155.
27.
LupoCUngureanuANVaraldaMBrustioPR. Running technique is more effective than soccer-specific training for improving the sprint and agility performances with ball possession of prepubescent soccer players. Biol Sport. 2019;36(3):249-255.
28.
MaloneJDi MicheleRMorgansRBurgessDMortonJPDrustB. Seasonal training-load quantification in elite English Premier League soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(4):489-497.
29.
MaloneSRoeMDoranDAGabbettTJCollinsK. High chronic training loads and exposure to bouts of maximal velocity running reduce injury risk in elite Gaelic football. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(3):250-254.
30.
ManeiroRLosadaJLCasalCAArdáA. The influence of match status on ball possession in high performance women’s football. Front Psychol. 2020;11:487.
31.
MaraJKThompsonKGKateLMorganS. The acceleration and deceleration profiles of elite female soccer players during competitive matches. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(9):867-872.
32.
Martín-GarcíaAGómez DíazABradleyPSMoreraFCasamichanaD. Quantification of a professional football team’s external load using a microcycle structure. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32:3511-3518.
33.
MeylanCTrewinJMcKeanK. Quantifying explosive actions in international women’s soccer. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(3):310-315.
34.
MilanovićZSporišGJamesN, et al. Physiological demands, morphological characteristics, physical abilities and injuries of female soccer players. J Hum Kinet. 2017;60:77-83.
35.
MorgansRDi MicheleRDrustB. Soccer match-play represents an important component of the power training stimulus in Premier League players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(5):665-667.
36.
Muñoz-LopezAGranero-GilPPino-OrtegaJDe HoyoM. The validity and reliability of a 5-Hz GPS device for quantifying athletes’ sprints and movement demands specific to team sports. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2017;12(1):156-166.
37.
Nevado-GarrosaFTorreblanca-MartínezVParedes-HernándezVDel Campo-VecinoJBalsalobre-FernándezC. Effects of an eccentric overload and small-side games training in match accelerations and decelerations performance in female under-23 soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2021;61(3):365-371.
38.
OsgnachCPoserSBernardiniRRinaldoRDi PramperoPE. Energy cost and metabolic power in elite soccer: a new match analysis approach. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(1):170-178.
39.
Ramirez-CampilloRSanchez-SanchezJRomero-MoraledaBYanciJGarcía-HermosoAManuel ClementeF. Effects of plyometric jump training in female soccer player’s vertical jump height: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(13):1475-1487.
40.
ScottDNorrisDLovellR. Dose-response relationship between external load and wellness in elite women’s soccer matches: do customized velocity thresholds add value? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Sep 4]. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020;15(9):1245-1251.
41.
StevensTGAde RuiterCJTwiskJWRSavelsberghGJPBeekPJ. Quantification of in-season training load relative to match load in professional Dutch Eredivisie football players. Sci Med Footb. 2017;1(2):117-125.
42.
ThorntonHRArmstrongCRRigbyAMinahanCLJohnstonRDDuthieGM. Preparing for an Australian Football League Women’s League Season. Front Sports Act Living. 2020;2:608939.
43.
VescoviJDFaveroTG. Motion characteristics of women’s college soccer matches: Female Athletes in Motion (FAiM) study. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(3):405-414.
44.
WatsonABricksonSBrooksADunnW. Subjective well-being and training load predict in-season injury and illness risk in female youth soccer players. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(3):194-199.
