Management of carotid stenosis remains controversial despite several trials evaluating carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS). We compared attitudes in the management of carotid stenosis between selected experts within Europe and North America.
Methods:
A 3-phase Delphi survey was e-mailed to select stroke experts from Europe (n = 390) and North America (n = 289). Those completing the initial survey were shown all responses after each survey round. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement.
Results:
For phases 1, 2, and 3, response rates were 32%, 62%, and 73%, respectively. Overall, 100 (15%) of 679 participated in all 3 phases, 19% Europeans versus 9% North Americans (P = .0007). The European group reached consensus in 6 of 15 statements; The North American group reached consensus in 4 of 15. Ninety percentage of Europeans versus 70% of North Americans (P = .017) stated CEA is superior to CAS for symptomatic carotid stenosis. This difference was not significant in the final model (adjusted odds ratio: 3.72 [95% confidence interval: 0.95-14.5]). Sixty-nine percentage of North Americans agreed there is a stronger indication for CAS over CEA in patients younger than 65 years for symptomatic carotid stenosis, whereas 55% of Europeans (P = .023) disagreed. For asymptomatic carotid stenosis, when asked how likely they would recommend CAS, 62% North Americans said “sometimes” versus 60% of Europeans said “never” (P = .06).
Conclusion:
The majority of North American and European respondents did not consider the 2 procedures equivalent and seemed to indicate that CEA was preferred for the management of carotid stenosis. These findings need to be further explored to help establish evidence-based guidelines.
PettyGWBrownRDJrWhisnantJPSicksJDO’FallonWMWiebersDO. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke. 1999;30(12):2513–2516.
2.
Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet2001;357(9270):1729–1737.
3.
MasJLChatellierGBeyssenB. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(16):1660–1671.
4.
EderleJDobsonJFeatherstoneRL; International Carotid Stenting Study investigators. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (international carotid stenting study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010; 375(9719):985–997.
5.
YadavJSWholeyMHKuntzRE; Stenting and Angioplasty With Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy Investigators. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1493–1501.
6.
GurmHSYadavJSFayadP; SAPPHIRE Investigators. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(15):1572–1579.
7.
RinglebPAAllenbergJBrückmannH; SPACE Collaborative Group. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1239–1247.
8.
EcksteinHHRinglebPAllenbergJR. Results of the stent-protected angioplasty vs carotid endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(10):893–902.
9.
BrottTGHobsonRW IIHowardG; CREST Investigators. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):11–23.
10.
EconomopoulosKPSergentanisTNTsivgoulisGMariolisADStefanadisC. Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes. Stroke. 2011;42(3):687–692.
11.
BangaloreSKumarSWetterslevJ. Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(2):172–184.
12.
MakrisGCGeroulakosGNicolaidesAN. Letter by Makris et al regarding article, “carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes.”Stroke. 2011;42(6):e397.
13.
HackeWBrownMMMasJL. Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting: an international perspective. Stroke. 2006;37(2):344.
14.
HartRGNgKH. Stroke prevention in asymptomatic carotid artery atherosclerosis: stenosis is only part of the question, revascularization is rarely the right answer. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015, 125(5): 363–369.
15.
EastcottHH. Carotid endarterectomy: a mid-Atlantic view. Br J Surg. 1986;73(11):865–866.
16.
GuptaRJovinTGYavargalDAbou-CheblA. Carotid endarterectomy vs. carotid stenting: fairly comparable or unfairly compared?Front Neurol. 2010;1:14.
17.
Lovrencic-HuzjanARundekTKatsnelsonM. Recommendations for management of patients with carotid stenosis. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:175869.
18.
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee and the ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(5):457–507.
19.
TenderaMAboyansVBartelinkML; European Stroke Organisation; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(22):2851–2906.
NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance 388. Carotid artery stent placement for asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis. Guidance 388 (Issued April 2011). www.nice.org.uk/ipg388. Accessed December 5, 2017.
22.
RicottaJJAburahmaAAscherEEskandariMFariesPLalBK; Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated society of vascular surgery guidelines of management of extracranial carotid disease. executive summary. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(3):832–836.
23.
MeschiaJFBushnellCBoden-AlbalaB; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Council on Hypertension. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke. a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(12):3754–3832.
24.
CouttsSBWeinTHLindsayMP; Heart, and Stroke Foundation Canada Canadian Stroke Best Practices Advisory Committee. On behalf of the Heart And Stroke Foundation Canada Canadian Stroke Best Practices Advisory Committee. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: secondary prevention of stroke guidelines, update 2014. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(3):282–291.
25.
MasuhrFBuschMEinhauplKM. Differences in medical and surgical therapy for stroke prevention between leading experts in North America And Western Europe. Stroke. 1998;29(2):339–345.
26.
MalikZShalhoubJHettigeRDaviesAH. The role of endarterectomy and stenting in the management of carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year Delphi survey. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011;45(1):15–21.
27.
ChaturvediSMeinkeJLSt PierreEBertasioB. Attitudes of Canadian and U.S. neurologists regarding carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis. Can J Neurol Sci. 2000;27(2):116–119.
28.
LikertR. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol.1932;140:1–55.
29.
El KhouryRFisherMSavitzSI. Current practice versus willingness to enroll in clinical trials: paradox among vascular neurologists about treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(9):2038–2043.
30.
LinstoneHATuroffM. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Advanced Book Program; 1975.
31.
DirksMNiessenLWKoudstaalPJFrankeCLvan OostenbruggeRJDippelDW; Delphi panel on indications and contraindications for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: from trial exclusion criteria to clinical contraindications. an international Delphi study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(7):685–689.
32.
MacdonaldSLeeRWilliamsRStansbyG; Delphi Carotid Stenting Consensus Panel. Towards safer carotid artery stenting: a scoring system for anatomic suitability. Stroke. 2009;40(5):1698–1703.
33.
AbbottALAdelmanMAAlexandrovAV. Why calls for more routine carotid stenting are currently inappropriate: an international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement. Stroke. 2013;44(4):1186–1190.
34.
BrottTGHowardGRoubinGS; CREST Investigators. Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(11):1021–1031.
35.
MasJLArquizanCCalvetD; EVA-3S Investigators. Long-term follow-up study of endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis trial. Stroke. 2014;45(9):2750–2756.
36.
BonatiLHDobsonJFeatherstoneRL; International Carotid Stenting Study Investigators. Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):529–538.
37.
RothwellPMEliasziwMGutnikovSAWarlowCPBarnettHJ; Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists Collaboration. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet. 2004;363(9413):915–924.
38.
HallidayAMansfieldAMarroJ; MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9420):1491–1502.
39.
SpenceJDNaylorAR. Endarterectomy, stenting, or neither for asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(11):1087–1088.
40.
HowardVJMeschiaJFLalBK; CREST-2 study investigators. CREST-2 study investigators. Carotid revascularization and medical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: protocol of the CREST-2 clinical trials. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(7):770–778.
RosenfieldKMatsumuraJSChaturvediS; ACT I Investigators. Randomized trial of stent versus surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(11):1011–1020.
43.
BrooksWHJonesMRGislerP. Carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy: 10-year randomized trial in a community hospital. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(2):163–168.
44.
LiYYangJJZhuSHXuBWangL. Long-term efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017;12(17):e0180804.
45.
MoresoliPHabibBReynierPSecrestMHEisenbergMJFilionKB. Carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2017;48(8):2150–2157.
46.
SardarPChatterjeeSAronowHD. Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for stroke prevention: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(18):2266–2275.
47.
BoykoMIancuDLesiukHDowlatshahiDShamyMCF. Decision making and the limits of evidence: a case study of acute stroke in pregnancy. Neurohospitalist. 2016;6(2):70–75.
48.
ShamyMCJaigobinCS. The complexities of acute stroke decision-making: a survey of neurologists. Neurology. 2013;81(13):1130–1133.
