Abstract
We evaluated the water-vapor output from four brands of unheated, prefilled bubble humidifiers—the Aerwey 300, the Aquapak 301, the McGaw 250, and the Travenol 500—at oxygen flowrates of 2, 4, 6, and 8 l/min. We recorded relative humidity (RH) and temperature in a test chamber at intervals over a minimum period of 24 h, and we calculated water-vapor content (WVC) and corresponding RH at 37°C. Ambient RH was 53.4% ± 5.25% (mean ± 1 SD) at a test-chamber temperature of 26.2°C ± 0.79°C. Mean 24-h WVC at 2 l/min (n = 20) ranged from 20.4 ± 0.63 mg/l (McGaw) to 17.2 ± 0.76 mg/l (Aerwey). This corresponded to a range of RH at 37°C of 46.6% ± 1.43% (McGaw) to 39.1% ± 1.72% (Aerwey). A statistically significant difference in mean WVC existed between brands of humidifiers (P < 0.001). The McGaw and Travenol humidifiers consistently delivered hydrated gas with a greater WVC than did either the Aerwey or Aquapak humidifiers (P < 0.001). A statistically significant decrease in mean WVC and RH at 37°C occurred as the oxygen flowrate increased (P < 0.001). None of the humidifiers was able to hydrate the source gas to a mean equivalent of 50% RH at 37°C, at any flowrate. The design of the humidifier bubble diffuser and the source-gas flowrate appear to be the prime determinants of the humidification efficiency of unheated, prefilled bubble humidifiers.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
