Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Retromandibular Transparotid and Transoral Endoscopic-Assisted Approach for Surgical Management of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures

Abstract

Study Design:

A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the retromandibular transparotid (RMT) approach with endoscopic-assisted transoral (ENDO) approach used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of adult mandibular subcondylar fractures.

Objectives:

To evaluate and compare the primary functional outcome using the Helkimo’s dysfunction index, the surgical ease, the incidence of facial nerve weakness, the cosmetic outcomes and the number of complications following ORIF of mandibular subcodylar fractures using the RMT and ENDO approaches.

Methods:

In this prospective study, 20 patients with unilateral/bilateral subcondylay fractures requiring ORIF were recruited between 2017 and 2018. Patients were randomly divided into RMT and ENDO group, 10 patients in each. Clinical and radiological assessment was done preoperatively and in postoperative period it was done at different intervals over the period of 6 months. The intraoperative parameter time taken during surgery was correlated for association with the time elasped since day of trauma and with the fracture severity. Similarly, the presence of multiple fractures of the mandible and postoperative occlusion were evaluated for the association.

Results:

Comparable functional results were noted in both groups without any statistical significance. ORIF in ENDO group proved to be more time-consuming. For the RMT group, visible scars were rated best or close to best at the end of 6 months but a greater number of facial nerve injuries were reported in the RMT group.

Conclusions:

Superiority of one approach over others cannot be established since the outcomes were not statistically different. However, the ENDO approach appears to be safer. Therefore, there is a need for the development of innovative armamentarium which would improve the dexterity and ease of the surgeon and hence the total time taken for this minimally invasive approach for the management of subcondylar fracture.

Keywords

mandibular subcondylar fractures retromandibular transparotid approach endoscopic-assisted transoral approach

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Moraissi

Ellis

. Surgical treatment of adult mandibular condylar fractures provides better outcomes than closed treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(3):482–493. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.027

Zachariades

Mezitis

Mourouzis

Papadakis

Spanou

. Fractures of the mandibular condyle: a review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposals. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2006;34(7):421–432. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2006.07.854

Villarreal

Monje

Junquera

Mateo

Morillo

González

. Mandibular condyle fractures: determinants of treatment and outcome. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.010

Mueller

Czerwinski

Lee

Kellman

. Condylar fracture repair: use of the endoscope to advance traditional treatment philosophy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;14(1):1–9. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2005.10.004

Ellis

McFadden

Simon

Throckmorton

. Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(9):950–958. doi:10.1053/joms.2000.8734

Kanno

Sukegawa

Tatsumi

, et al. The retromandibular transparotid approach for reduction and rigid internal fixation using two locking miniplates in mandibular condylar neck fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(2):177–184. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.008

Kanno

Sukegawa

Tatsumi

, et al.

Does a retromandibular transparotid approach for the open treatment of condylar fractures result in facial nerve injury?

J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(10):2019–2032. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2016.05.022

Schmelzeisen

Cienfuegos-Monroy

Schön

Chen

Cunningham

Goldhahn

. Patient benefit from endoscopically assisted fixation of condylar neck fractures—a randomized controlled trial. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(1):147–158. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.019

Shi

Patil

Gupta

. Facial nerve injuries associated with the retromandibular transparotid approach for reduction and fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2015;43(3):402–407. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2014.12.009

10.

Kokemueller

Konstantinovic

Barth

, et al. Endoscope-assisted transoral reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures—a prospective double-center study. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(2):384–395. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.035

11.

Suhas

Ramdas

Lingam

Kumar

Sasidharan

Aadithya

. Assessment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction in condylar fracture of the mandible using the Helkimo index. Indian J Plastic Surg. 2017;50(02):207–212. doi:10.4103/ijps.ijps_125_16

12.

Singer

Arora

Dagum

Valentine

Hollander

. Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7):1892–1897. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000287275.15511.10

13.

Singh

Bhagol

Goel

Kumar

Verma

. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(6):1304–1309. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.01.001

14.

Ghezta

Bhardwaj

Rani

Ram

. Efficacy of retromandibular transparotid approach for the management of extracapsular subcondylar mandibular fractures using 2-mm titanium miniplates: a prospective clinical study. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(8):1613–1621. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.045

15.

Nogami

Takahashi

Yamauchi

, et al. Clinical comparison between the retromandibular approach for reduction and fixation and endoscope-assisted open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular condyle fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(6):1815–1818. doi:10.1097/scs.0b013e3182710393

16.

Chrcanovic

. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: a meta-analysis. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(2):158–179. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.024

17.

Haug

Brandt

. Traditional versus endoscope-assisted open reduction with rigid internal fixation (ORIF) of adult mandibular condyle fractures: a review of the literature regarding current thoughts on management. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(10):1272–1279. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.017

18.

Bhutia

Kumar

Jose

Roychoudhury

Trikha

. Evaluation of facial nerve following open reduction and internal fixation of Subcondylar fracture through retromandibular transparotid approach. Br J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52(3):236–240. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.12.002

19.

Manisali

Amin

Aghabeigi

Newman

. Retromandibular approach to the mandibular condyle: a clinical and cadaveric study. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(3):253–256. doi:10.1054/ijom.2002.0270

20.

Snyder

Cunningham

. The biology of open versus closed treatment of condylar fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2017;25(1):35–46. doi:10.1016/j.cxom.2016.10.006

21.

Choi

K-Y

Yang

J-D

Chung

H-Y

Cho

B-C

. Current concepts in the mandibular condyle fracture management part II: open reduction versus closed reduction. Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39(4):301. doi:10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.301

22.

Choi

. Comparison of computed tomography imaging before and after functional treatment of bilateral condylar fractures in adults. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 1996;25(1):30–33. doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(96)80008-7

23.

Sandler

Andreasen

Johns

. The use of endoscopy in the management of Subcondylar fractures of the mandible: a cadaver study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88(5):529–531. doi:10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70080-6