Impact of Middle Turbinectomy on Airflow to the Olfactory Cleft: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study

Abstract

Background

The impact of middle turbinate resection (MTR) on olfaction remains a point of debate in the current literature. Few studies have objectively evaluated olfactory cleft airflow following MTR; thus, the mechanism by which MTR may impact olfaction is poorly understood. It is not known whether the postsurgical changes in airway volume, flow, and resistance increase odorant transport or disrupt the patterns of normal airflow. Computational fluid dynamics can be used to study the nasal airway and predict responses to surgical intervention.

Objective

To evaluate the functional impact of MTR on nasal airflow, resistance, and olfaction.

Methods

Five maxillofacial computed tomography scans of patients without signs of significant sinusitis or nasal polyposis were used. Control models for each patient were compared to their corresponding model after virtual total MTR. For each model, nasal airway volume, nasal resistance, and air flow rate were determined. Odorant transport of 3 different odorants in the nasal cavity was simulated based on the computed steady airflow field.

Results

Total airflow significantly increased following bilateral MTR in all patient models (P < .05). Consistent with our airflow results, we found a decrease in nasal resistance following MTR. MTR significantly increased area averaged flux to the olfactory cleft when compared to controls for phenylethyl alcohol (high-sorptive odorant). Results for carvone (medium sorptive) were similarly elevated. MTR impact on limonene, a low flux odorant, was equivocal.

Conclusion

MTR increases nasal airflow while decreasing the nasal resistance. Overall, olfactory flux increased for high sorptive (phenylethyl alcohol) and medium sorpitve (l-carvone) odorants. However, the significant variation observed in one of our models suggests that the effects of MTR on the nasal airflow and the resultant olfaction can vary between individuals based on individual anatomic differences.

Keywords

middle turbinate resection middle turbinectomy olfaction nasal airflow computational fluid dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

LaMear

Davis

Templer

et al . Partial endoscopic middle turbinectomy augmenting functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992; 107(3):382–389.

Stewart

MG.

Middle turbinate resection.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124(1):104–106.

Morgenstein

Krieger

MK.

Experience in middle turbinectomy.

Laryngoscope. 1980; 90:1596–1603.

Havas

Lowinger

DS.

Comparison of functional endonasal sinus surgery with and without partial middle turbinate resection.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000; 109(7):634–640.

Nurse

Duncavage

JA.

Surgery of the inferior and middle turbinates.

Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009; 42(2):295–309.

Zhao

Malhotra

Rosen

et al . Computational fluid dynamics as surgical planning tool: a pilot study on middle turbinate resection. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2014; 297(11):2187–2195.

Dayal

Rhee

Garcia

GJ.

Impact of middle versus inferior total turbinectomy on nasal aerodynamics.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 155(3):518–525.

Jiang

Gao

et al . Numerical simulation of airflow fields in two typical nasal structures of empty nose syndrome: a computational fluid dynamics study. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e84243.

Soler

Hwang

Mace

et al . Outcomes after middle turbinate resection: revisiting a controversial topic. Laryngoscope. 2010; 120(4):832–837.

10.

Choby

Hobson

Lee

et al . Clinical effects of middle turbinate resection after endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014; 28(6):502–507.

11.

Friedman

Caldarelli

Venkatesan

et al . Endoscopic sinus surgery with partial middle turbinate resection: effects on olfaction. Laryngoscope. 1996; 106(8):977–981.

12.

Zhao

Scherer

Hajiloo

et al . Effect of anatomy on human nasal air flow and odorant transport patterns: implications for olfaction. Chem Senses. 2004; 29(5):365–379.

13.

Farag

Leach

et al . Computational fluid dynamics and trigeminal sensory examinations of empty nose syndrome patients. Laryngoscope. 2017; 127(6):E176–E184.

14.

Jiang

Kim

et al . Nasal structural and aerodynamic features that may benefit normal olfactory sensitivity. Chem Senses. 2018; 43(4):229–237.

15.

Lee

Goyal

Zhao

Computational fluid dynamics to evaluate the effectiveness of inferior turbinate reduction techniques to improve nasal airflow.

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018; 20(4):263–270.

16.

Farag

Maza

et al . Investigation of the abnormal nasal aerodynamics and trigeminal functions among empty nose syndrome patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018; 8(3):444–452.

17.

Otto

Farag

et al . Computational fluid dynamics evaluation of posterior septectomy as a viable treatment option for large septal perforations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017; 7(7):718–725.

18.

Jiang

Dong

Zhao

Computational modeling and validation of human nasal airflow under various breathing conditions.

J Biomech. 2017; 64:59–68.

19.

Zhang

Kleinstreuer

Laminar‐to‐turbulent fluid–nanoparticle dynamics simulations: Model comparisons and nanoparticle‐deposition applications.

Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 2011; 27(12):1930–1950.

20.

Zhao

Dalton

Yang

et al . Numerical modeling of turbulent and laminar airflow and odorant transport during sniffing in the human and rat nose. Chem Senses. 2006; 31:107–118.

21.

Lee

Jeon

Chung

et al . Effects of partial middle turbinectomy with varying resection volume and location on nasal functions and airflow characteristics by CFD. Comput Biol Med. 2016; 77:214–221.

22.

Damm

Vent

Schmidt

et al . Intranasal volume and olfactory function. Chem Senses. 2002; 27(9):831–839.