Multiple methods exist for skull base reconstruction of defects created by expanded endonasal approaches. While the nasoseptal flap (NSF) has been well established as the workhorse of mucosal reconstruction in complex skull base defects in multi-layered closures, a variety of options exist for the inner layer of multilayer reconstruction, including fascia lata (FL).
Objective
To present our experience and outcomes in utilizing FL in multiple ways to reconstruct a wide variety of complex skull base defects.
Methods
Retrospective review was performed from May 2017 to February 2022 to identify 50 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic skull base reconstruction using FL.
Results
FL was employed for reconstruction in 50 patients included in the study: 37 undergoing primary expanded endonasal skull base surgery and 13 revision cases. A wide range of complex pathology was treated, with meningioma and craniopharyngioma being the two most common. FL was utilized as a “button” graft (34/50, 68.0%), free graft inlay/onlay (13/50, 26.0%), and as a button graft combined with onlay (3/50, 6.0%). Expanded surgery defects addressed included tuberculum sella/sphenoid planum (36/50, 72.0%), clivus (6/50, 12.0%), and cribriform/planum (8/50, 16.0%). Successful reconstruction with fascia lata was accomplished in 46/50 cases (92%), with only 4 cases (8%) requiring revision for post-op CSF leak. Donor-site complications were rare with only 1 case (2.0%) of post-op seroma.
Conclusion
FL, usually with NSF, offers a versatile option for the reconstruction of challenging defects with excellent outcomes and minimal morbidity. FL is emerging as a workhorse for reconstruction of the inner layer of complex skull base defects.
CappabiancaPCavalloLMSolariDStagnoVEspositoFde AngelisM.Endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg.2014; 82(6):S3–S11.
2.
KasemsiriPCarrauRLDitzel FilhoLF, et al. Advantages and limitations of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base. World Neurosurg.2014; 82(6):S12–S21.
3.
KassamASnydermanCHMintzAGardnerPCarrauRL.Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E3.
4.
SnydermanCHCarrauRLKassamAB, et al. Endoscopic skull base surgery: principles of endonasal oncological surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97(8):658–664.
5.
SnydermanCHPantHCarrauRLPrevedelloDGardnerPKassamAB.What are the limits of endoscopic sinus surgery? The expanded endonasal approach to the skull base. Keio J Med. 2009;58(3):152–160.
6.
DehdashtiARGannaAWitterickIGentiliF.Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base and suprasellar lesions: indications and limitations. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(4):677–687; discussion 687-679.
7.
WangEWZanationAMGardnerPA, et al. ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019;9(S3):S145–S365.
8.
BriggsRJWormaldPJ.Endoscopic transnasal intradural repair of anterior skull base cerebrospinal fluid fistulae. J Clin Neurosci. 2004;11(6):597–599.
9.
HarveyRJParmarPSacksRZanationAM.Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(2):452–459.
10.
HarveyRJSmithJEWiseSKPatelSJFrankelBMSchlosserRJ.Intracranial complications before and after endoscopic skull base reconstruction. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(5):516–521.
HadadGBassagasteguyLCarrauRL, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(10):1882–1886.
13.
KimGGHangAXMitchellCAZanationAM. Pedicled extranasal flaps in skull base reconstruction. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;74:71–80.
14.
PatelMRTaylorRJHackmanTG, et al. Beyond the nasoseptal flap: outcomes and pearls with secondary flaps in endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(4):846–852.
15.
ThorpBDSreenathSBEbertCSZanationAM.Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(4):E4.
16.
SiglerACD'AnzaBLoboBCWoodardTDRecinosPFSindwaniR.Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: an evolution of materials and methods. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017;50(3):643–653.
17.
AbbassyMWoodardTDSindwaniRRecinosPF.An overview of anterior skull base meningiomas and the endoscopic endonasal approach. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016;49(1):141–152.
18.
AbiriAAbiriPGoshtasbiK, et al. Endoscopic anterior skull base reconstruction: a meta-analysis and systematic review of graft type. World Neurosurg. 2020;139:460–470.
19.
CavalloLMSolariDSommaTCappabiancaP.The 3F (fat, flap, and flash) technique for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal suprasellar approach. World Neurosurg. 2019; 126:439–446.
20.
HuFGuYZhangX, et al. Combined use of a gasket seal closure and a vascularized pedicle nasoseptal flap multilayered reconstruction technique for high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks after endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(2):181–187.
21.
PatelMRStadlerMESnydermanCH, et al. How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations. Skull Base.2010;20(6):397–404.
22.
ZanationAMSnydermanCHCarrauRLKassamABGardnerPAPrevedelloDM.Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: a new method for endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(1):13–18.
23.
ZerrisVAJamesKSRobertsJBBellEHeilmanCB.Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;83(2):580–588.
24.
DE AndradeEJAlmeidaJPBorghei-RazaviH, et al.Reconstruction after extended endonasal approaches to the anterior cranial base: surgical techniques and current results. J Neurosurg Sci. 2021;65(2):151–159.
25.
AmitMMargalitNAbergelAGilZ.Fascia lata for endoscopic reconstruction of high-flow leaks: the champagne cork technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(4):697–700.
26.
FiorindiAGioffrèGBoaroA, et al. Banked fascia lata in sellar dura reconstruction after endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(4):303–309.
27.
GiovannettiFBarberaGPriorePPucciRDella MonacaMValentiniV.Fascia lata harvesting: the donor site closure morbidity. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(4):e303–e306.
28.
GökAErkutluIAlptekinMKanlikamaM.Three-layer reconstruction with fascia lata and vascularized pericranium for anterior skull base defects. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;146(1):53–56; discussion 56-57.
29.
LuginbuhlAJCampbellPGEvansJRosenM.Endoscopic repair of high-flow cranial base defects using a bilayer button. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(5):876–880.
30.
CavalloLMde DivitiisOAydinS, et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the suprasellar area: anatomic considerations—part 1. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(S3):24–33; discussion 33-34.
31.
Vaz-GuimaraesFRastelliMMJrFernandez-MirandaJC, et al.Impact of dynamic endoscopy and bimanual-binarial dissection in endoscopic endonasal surgery training: a laboratory investigation. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(5):365–371.
32.
FlatoRPassananteGJSkalskiMRPatelDBWhiteEAMatcukGRJr. The iliotibial tract: imaging, anatomy, injuries, and other pathology. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46(5):605–622.
33.
MatsumotoHSeedhomB.Tension characteristics of the iliotibial tract and role of its superficial layer. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995(313):253–255.
34.
MattavelliDSchreiberAVillaretAB, et al.Complications and donor site morbidity of 3-layer reconstruction with iliotibial tract of the anterior skull base: retrospective analysis of 186 patients. Head Neck. 2018;40(1):63–69.
35.
RingelBAbergelAHorowitzG, et al.Skull base reconstruction with multilayered fascia lata: a single-center 17 years experience. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021;82(Suppl 3):e217–e223.
36.
WalterAJHentzJGMagrinaJFCornellaJL.Harvesting autologous fascia lata for pelvic reconstructive surgery: techniques and morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1354–1358; discussion 1459.
37.
ChinDHarveyRJ.Endoscopic reconstruction of frontal, cribiform and ethmoid skull base defects. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;74:104–118.
38.
LiuJKSchmidtRFChoudhryOJShuklaPAEloyJA.Surgical nuances for nasoseptal flap reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks after endoscopic skull base surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;32(6):E7.
39.
HoriguchiKNishiokaHFukuharaNYamaguchi-OkadaMYamadaS.A new multilayer reconstruction using nasal septal flap combined with fascia graft dural suturing for high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal surgery. Neurosurg Rev. 2016;39(3):419–427.
40.
BellEBCohenERSargiZLeibowitzJ.Free tissue reconstruction of the anterior skull base: a review. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;6(2):132–136.
41.
KangSYEskanderAHachemRA, et al. Salvage skull base reconstruction in the endoscopic era: vastus lateralis free tissue transfer. Head Neck. 2018;40(4):E45–e52.
42.
MelecaJBKerrRPPrendesBLFritzMA.Anterolateral thigh fascia lata rescue flap: a new weapon in the battle against osteoradionecrosis. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(12):2688–2693.
43.
SreenathSBGrafmillerKTTangDM, et al.Free tissue transfer for skull base osteoradionecrosis: a novel approach in the endoscopic era. Laryngoscope. 2023;133(3):562–568.
44.
LoboBCBaumanisMMNelsonRF.Surgical repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks: a systematic review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017;2(5):215–224.
45.
RansomERPalmerJNKennedyDWChiuAG.Assessing risk/benefit of lumbar drain use for endoscopic skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(3):173–177.
46.
StokkenJRecinosPFWoodardTSindwaniR.The utility of lumbar drains in modern endoscopic skull base surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;23(1):78–82.
47.
ZwagermanNTWangEWShinSS, et al.Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg.2018;131(4):1–7.
48.
RoxburyCRLoboBCKshettryVR, et al. Perioperative management in endoscopic endonasal skull-base surgery: a survey of the North American Skull Base Society. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018;8(5):631–640.
