Comparative Restenosis and Revision Rates of Draf IIB Versus Draf III Frontal Sinusotomy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-Analysis Stratified by Endotype
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026
Comparative Restenosis and Revision Rates of Draf IIB Versus Draf III Frontal Sinusotomy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-Analysis Stratified by Endotype
No prior meta-analysis has directly compared restenosis or revision rates between Draf IIb and Draf III in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) or evaluated how Type 2 versus non-Type 2 endotypes influence these outcomes.
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 5 January 2025 for studies reporting restenosis or revision after Draf IIb or Draf III in adults with CRS. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions (Freeman–Tukey transformation; Hartung–Knapp CIs), pooled restenosis and revision rates, with subgroup analyses by procedure type and endotype.
Results
Thirty-eight studies met inclusion criteria (restenosis n = 1550; revision n = 1305). The pooled restenosis proportion across procedures was 9% (95% CI: 5-14%) and the pooled revision proportion was 9% (95% CI: 5-13%). Restenosis was lower after Draf IIb than Draf III (0.8% vs. 12%), with revision rates showing a similar pattern (2% vs. 10%). Type 2 CRS demonstrated higher pooled rates of restenosis (8% vs. 1%) and revision (12% vs. 3%) compared with non-Type 2 CRS.
Conclusions
Draf IIb is associated with lower pooled restenosis and revision rates than Draf III in CRS. Type 2 inflammatory endotype confers substantially higher risk of adverse frontal sinus outcomes. Incorporating endotype into procedural decision-making may improve prognosis. Prospective, endotype-stratified studies are needed to refine indications for Draf IIb versus Draf III and optimize adjunctive management strategies.
WormaldPJHosemanWCallejasC, et al.The international frontal Sinus anatomy classification (IFAC) and classification of the extent of endoscopic frontal Sinus surgery (EFSS). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(7):677-696. doi:10.1002/alr.21738
2.
KohanskiMAToskalaEKennedyDW. Evolution in the surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis: Current indications and pitfalls. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(5):1561-1569.
3.
JacobsJB. 100 Years of frontal Sinus surgery. Laryngoscope.1997;107(S83):1-36.
4.
StammbergerH. FESS,"Uncapping the Egg”, the Endoscopic Approach to Frontal Recess and Sinuses: A Surgical Technique of the Graz University Medical School; Introducing the New Karl Storz 45 Hopkins II Telescopes. Verlag Endo-Press; 1999.
5.
McLaughlin JrRBRehlRMLanzaDC. Clinically relevant frontal sinus anatomy and physiology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001;34(1):1-22. doi:10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70291-7. PMID: 11344058
6.
SuhJDKennedyDW. Treatment options for chronic rhinosinusitis. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011;8(1):132-140.
7.
FokkensWJLundVJHopkinsC, et al.Executive summary of EPOS 2020 including integrated care pathways. Rhinol J. 2020;58(2):82-111.
8.
DrafWWeberRKeerlRConstantinidisJ. Current aspects of frontal sinus surgery. I: Endonasal frontal sinus drainage in inflammatory diseases of the paranasal sinuses. HNO. 1995;43(6):352-357.
9.
WeberRDrafWKratzschBHosemannWSchaeferSD. Modern concepts of frontal Sinus surgery. Laryngoscope.2001;111(1):137-146.
NaidooYBassiouniAKeenMWormaldPJ. Long-term outcomes for the endoscopic modified lothrop/draf III procedure: A 10-year review. Laryngoscope.2014;124(1):43-49.
12.
AbuzeidWMVakilMLinJ, et al.Endoscopic modified lothrop procedure after failure of primary endoscopic sinus surgery: A meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018;8(5):605-613.
13.
ZhangXYeTHuangZ, et al.Clinical predictors of frontal ostium restenosis after Draf 3 procedure for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018;32(4):287-293.
14.
StevensWWPetersATHirschAG, et al.Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma, and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(4):1061-1070.e3.
15.
BachertCZhangNHoltappelsG, et al.Presence of IL-5 protein and IgE antibodies to staphylococcal enterotoxins in nasal polyps is associated with comorbid asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(5):962-968.e6.
16.
TomassenPVandeplasGVan ZeleT, et al.Inflammatory endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis based on cluster analysis of biomarkers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(5):1449-1456.e4.
17.
HirayamaYShahidMSFinneyHA, et al.Comparison of outcomes for Draf IIB vs Draf III in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Rhinol J. 2025;63(3):258-285.
18.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
19.
FokkensWJLundVJHopkinsC, et al.European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;58(Suppl S29):1-464.
20.
MunnZBarkerTHMoolaS, et al.Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2127-2133.
21.
BastianelliMHuangLMoorePIqbalIZWoodsCMOoiEH. Anterior pedicled nasal flap in frontal Sinus drill-out patients: A randomised controlled pilot study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4329.
22.
HuangZHuangQZhouBMaJWangMDongY. Bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents for patients with refractory frontal diseases undergoing a revision Draf 3 procedure: A case series. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 2019;139(7):636-642.
23.
FischerRSeebauerCTZemanF, et al.Effectiveness of the lateral pedicled endonasal flap for prevention of restenosis in frontal sinus drillouts. Rhinol J. 2022;60(6):462-470.
24.
HildenbrandTWormaldPJWeberRK. Endoscopic frontal Sinus drainage draf type III with mucosal transplants. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012;26(2):148-151.
CasianoRRLivingstonJA. Endoscopic lothrop procedure: The university of Miami experience. Am J Rhinol. 1998;12(5):335-340.
27.
SeiberlingKFloreaniSRobinsonSWormaldPJ. Endoscopic management of frontal Sinus osteomas revisited. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(3):331-336.
28.
CloseLGLeachJLLeeNKManningSC. Endoscopic resection of the intranasal frontal Sinus floor. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;103(12):952-958.
29.
LeventiAChatzinakisVPapargyriouGEGeorgalasC. Enhancing frontal Sinus surgery: Assessing the long-term impact of free grafts and flaps in draf III procedures. J Pers Med. 2024;14(4):396.
30.
KikawadaTFujigakiMKikuraMMatsumotoMKikawadaK. Extended endoscopic frontal Sinus surgery to interrupted nasofrontal communication caused by scarring of the anterior ethmoid: Long-term results. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1999;125(1):92.
31.
GrossCWZachmannGCBeckerDG, et al.Follow-Up of university of Virginia experience with the modified lothrop procedure. Am J Rhinol. 1997;11(1):49-54.
32.
TranKNBeuleAGSingalDWormaldP. Frontal ostium restenosis after the endoscopic modified lothrop procedure. Laryngoscope.2007;117(8):1457-1462.
HajbeygiMNadjafiAAmaliASaediBSadrehosseiniSM. Frontal Sinus patency after extended frontal sinusotomy type III. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;28(88):337-343.
35.
JanisiewiczALeeJT. In-Office use of a steroid-eluting implant for maintenance of frontal ostial patency after revision Sinus surgery. Allergy Rhinol. 2015;6(1):ar.2015.6.0104.
36.
TurnerJHVaezeafsharRHwangPH. Indications and outcomes for draf IIB frontal Sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016;30(1):70-73.
37.
Alicandri-CiufelliMCantaffaCBassoMColacurcioVMarchioniDLucidiD. Influence of Pre-operative estimation of draf III expected diameter on surgical outcome. J Pers Med. 2024;14(9):951.
38.
ChanYMelroyCTKuhnCAKuhnFLDanielWTKuhnFA. Long-term frontal sinus patency after endoscopic frontal sinusotomy. Laryngoscope.2009;119(6):1229-1232.
39.
WormaldPJAnandaANairS. Modified endoscopic lothrop as a salvage for the failed osteoplastic flap with obliteration. Laryngoscope.2003;113(11):1988-1992.
40.
EloyJAFriedelMEKuperanABGovindarajSFolbeAJLiuJK. Modified mini-lothrop/extended draf IIB procedure for contralateral frontal sinus disease: A case series. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012;2(4):321-324.
41.
YeTZhouBLiC, et al.Mucosal flaps prevent neo-osteogenesis after frontal drill-out procedures: A computer-assisted study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023;8(4):816-823.
42.
GeorgalasCGoudakosJFokkensWJ. Osteoma of the skull base and sinuses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011;44(4):875-890.
43.
UlualpSOCarlsonTKToohillRJ. Osteoplastic flap versus modified endoscopic lothrop procedure in patients with frontal Sinus disease. Am J Rhinol. 2000;14(1):21-26.
44.
MorrisseyDKBassiouniAPsaltisAJNaidooYWormaldP. Outcomes of revision endoscopic modified lothrop procedure. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(5):518-522.
45.
SchulzeSLLoehrlTASmithTL. Outcomes of the modified endoscopic lothrop procedure. Am J Rhinol. 2002;16(5):269-273.
ShiraziMASilverALStankiewiczJA. Surgical outcomes following the endoscopic modified lothrop procedure. Laryngoscope.2007;117(5):765-769.
48.
WormaldPJXun ChanSZ. Surgical techniques for the removal of frontal recess cells obstructing the frontal ostium. Am J Rhinol. 2003;17(4):221-226.
49.
WormaldPJ. The axillary flap approach to the frontal recess. Laryngoscope.2002;112(3):494-499.
50.
CongerBTRileyKWoodworthBA. The draf III mucosal grafting technique: A prospective study. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2012;146(4):664-668.
51.
SeyedhadiSMojtabaMAShahinBHoseinaliK. The draf III septal flap technique: A preliminary report. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34(5):399-402.
52.
WormaldPJAnandaANairS. The modified endoscopic lothrop procedure in the treatment of complicated chronic frontal sinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003;28(3):215-220.
53.
HeCZhenHT. Value of a lateral inferior pedicle flap in draf IIb for recurrent frontal sinus diseases: A prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(10):4935-4942.
54.
KhoueirNVerillaudBCastelnuovoPHermanP. Value of double mucoperiosteal flaps to prevent restenosis in Draf II b/ III : First clinical report. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(2):746-749.
55.
FioriniFRNogueiraCVerillaudBSamaAHermanP. Value of septoturbinal flap in the frontal sinus drill-out type IIb according to draf. Laryngoscope.2016;126(11):2428-2432.
56.
BlauwblommeMGeorgalasCAhmedS, et al.Expert consensus on surgical management of primary diffuse type 2-dominant chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025;15(3):303-316.
57.
QiYHongJWuD. Necessary factors for efficient frontal Sinus irrigation after endoscopic Sinus surgery: A systematic review. J Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg. 2024;53:19160216241269375.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
