Abstract
Popular advice in media and self-help literature encourages people to trust their intuition when forming impressions of strangers. We tested this widespread lay belief by examining whether intuitive judgments are preferred over deliberate ones and whether such preferences are justified by differences in accuracy. In Study 1 (n = 401), participants from the general population reported using intuition more frequently, preferring it, and expressing greater confidence in it compared to deliberate reasoning when judging strangers. In Study 2, we analyzed 21,739 judgments from 380 users of the quiz app “Who Knows,” who inferred personality-related characteristics from short video introductions. Judgment mode was experimentally manipulated within persons across multiple game rounds. While intuitive judgments were again preferred, accuracy did not differ between conditions. Thus, although intuition is favored when judging strangers, it does not yield higher accuracy but may still be adaptive by achieving comparable accuracy with less time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
