Flow-diverter devices (FDDs) are new-generation stents placed in the parent artery at the level of the aneurysm neck to disrupt the intra-aneurysmal flow thus favoring intra-aneurysmal thrombosis.
Objective
The objective of this review article is to define the indication and results of the treatment of intracranial aneurysms by FDD, reviewing 18 studies of endovascular treatment by FDDs for a total of 1704 aneurysms in 1483 patients.
Methods
The medical literature on FDDs for intracranial aneurysms was reviewed from 2009 to December 2014. The keywords used were: “intracranial aneurysms,” “brain aneurysms,” “flow diverter,” “pipeline embolization device,” “silk flow diverter,” “surpass flow diverter” and “FRED flow diverter.”
Results
The use of these stents is advisable mainly for unruptured aneurysms, particularly those located at the internal carotid artery or vertebral and basilar arteries, for fusiform and dissecting aneurysms and for saccular aneurysms with large necks and low dome-to-neck ratio. The rate of aneurysm occlusion progressively increases during follow-up (81.5% overall rate in this review). The non-negligible rate of ischemic (mean 4.1%) and hemorrhagic (mean 2.9%) complications, the neurological morbidity (mean 3.5%) and the reported mortality (mean 3.4%) are the main limits of this technique.
Conclusion
Treatment with FDDs is a feasible and effective technique for unruptured aneurysms with complex anatomy (fusiform, dissecting, large neck, bifurcation with side branches) where coiling and clipping are difficult or impossible. Patient selection is very important to avoid complications and reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality. Further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to define the rate of complete occlusion.
ArreseISarabiaRPintadoR. Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery2013; 73: 193–199. discussion 199–200.
2.
BrinjikjiWMohammadHMLanzinoG. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: A meta-analysis. Stroke2013; 44: 442–447.
3.
DiazOGistTLManjarezG. Treatment of 14 intracranial aneurysms with the FRED system. J Neurointerv Surg2014; 6: 614–617.
4.
KocerNIslakCKizilkilicO. Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: Initial experience with short-term follow-up results. J Neurosurg2014; 120: 1158–1171.
5.
PereiraVMKellyMVegaP. New Pipeline Flex device: Initial experience and technical nuances. J Neurointerv Surg. Epub ahead of print 3 October 2014. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011347.
6.
BrigantiFLeoneGMarsegliaM. p64 Flow Modulation Device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Initial experience and technical aspects. J Neurointerv Surg. Epub ahead of print 20 April 2015. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015–011743.
7.
LylykPMirandaCCerattoR. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: The Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery2009; 64: 632–642.
8.
ByrneJVBeltechiRYarnoldJA. Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: A multicentre prospective study. PloS One2010; 5: 9.
9.
LubiczBCollignonLRaphaeliG. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke2010; 41: 2247–2253.
10.
BergeJBiondiAMachiP. Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012; 33: 1150–1155.
11.
BrigantiFNapoliMTortoraF. Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology2012; 54: 1145–1152.
12.
McAuliffeWWycocoVRiceH. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012; 33: 487–493.
13.
FischerSVajdaZAguilar PerezM. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: Initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology2012; 54: 369–382.
14.
WagnerACortsenMHauerbergJ. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Reconstruction of the parent artery with flow-diverting (Silk) stent. Neuroradiology2012; 54: 709–718.
15.
MaimonSGonenLNossekE. Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the SILK flow diverter: 2 years’ experience with 28 patients at a single center. Acta Neurochir (Wien)2012; 154: 979–987.
16.
PistocchiSBlancRBartoliniB. Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke2012; 43: 1032–1038.
17.
TähtinenOIManninenHIVanninenRL. The silk flow-diverting stent in the endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: Technical aspects and midterm results in 24 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery2012; 70: 617–623. discussion 623.
18.
SaatciIYavuzKOzerC. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter device: A single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012; 33: 1436–1446.
19.
VeliogluMKizilkilicOSelcukH. Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent. Neuroradiology2012; 54: 1355–1365.
20.
YuSCKwokCKChengPW. Intracranial aneurysms: Mid-term outcome of pipeline embolization devices—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology2012; 265: 893–901.
21.
ColbyGPLinLMGomezJF. Immediate procedural outcomes in 35 consecutive pipeline embolization cases: A single-center, single-user experience. J Neurointerv Surg2013; 5: 237–246.
22.
ÇinarCBozkayaHOranI. Endovascular treatment of cranial aneurysms with the pipeline flow-diverting stent: Preliminary mid-term results. Diagn Interv Radiol2013; 19: 154–164.
23.
O’KellyCJSpearsJChowM. Canadian experience with the pipeline embolization devices for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2013; 34: 381–387.
24.
WakhlooAKLylykPde VriesJ. Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015; 36: 98–107.
25.
CirilloLDall’OlioMPrinciottaC. The use of flow-diverting stents in the treatment of giant cerebral aneurysms: Preliminary results. Neuroradiol J2010; 23: 220–224.
26.
KulcsárZErnemannUWetzelSG. High-profile flow diverter (silk) implantation in the basilar artery: Efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke2010; 41: 1690–1696.
27.
SzikoraIBerenteiZKulcsarZ. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: The Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2010; 31: 1139–1147.
28.
ChanTTChanKYPangPK. Pipeline embolisation device for wide-necked internal carotid artery aneurysms in a hospital in Hong Kong: Preliminary experience. Hong Kong Med J2011; 17: 398–404.
29.
DeutschmannHAWehrschuetzMAugustinM. Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: Results from a single center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012; 33: 481–486.
30.
PufferRCKallmesDFCloftHJ. Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg2012; 116: 892–896.
31.
SiddiquiAHKanPAblaA. Complications after treatment with pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery2012; 71: E509–E513. discussion E513.
32.
LeonardiMCirilloLToniF. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting silk stents (BALT): A single centre experience. Interv Neuroradiol2011; 17: 306–315.
33.
LubiczBCollignonLRaphaeliG. Pipeline flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Preliminary experience in 20 patients with 27 aneurysms. World Neurosurg2011; 76: 114–119.
34.
NelsonPKLylykPSzikoraI. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2011; 32: 34–40.
35.
PianoMValvassoriLQuiliciL. Mid-term and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: A single-center experience. J Neurosurg2012; 118: 408–416.
36.
CruzJPChowMO’KellyC. Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012; 33: 603–608.
37.
De VriesJBoogaartsJVan NordenA. New generation of Flow Diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke2013; 44: 1567–1577.
38.
BrigantiFNapoliMLeoneG. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by flow diverter devices: Long-term results from a single center. Eur J Radiol2014; 83: 1683–1690.
39.
de Barros FariaMCastroRNLundquistJ. The role of the pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2011; 32: 2192–2195.
40.
PhillipsTJWenderothJDPhatourosCC. Safety of the pipeline embolization device in treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012; 33: 1225–1231.
41.
PufferRCKallmesDFCloftHJ. Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg2012; 116: 892–896.
BrigantiFDelehayeLLeoneG. Flow diverter device for the treatment of small middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. Epub ahead of print 20 January 2015. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011460.
44.
LinEBrouillardAMXiangJ. Endovascular management of adjacent tandem intracranial aneurysms: Utilization of stent-assisted coiling and flow diversion. Acta Neurochir (Wien)2015; 157: 379–187.
45.
MolyneuxAJKerrRSYuLM. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebledding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet2005; 366: 809–817.
46.
ChalouhiNJabbourPSinghalS. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: Predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke2013; 44: 1348–1353.
47.
CottierJPPascoAGallasS. Utility of balloon-assisted Guglielmi detachable coiling in the treatment of 49 cerebral aneurysms: A retrospective, multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2001; 22: 345–351.
48.
RaiAClineBTarabishyA. P-002 The financial impact of flow diverters on the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg2014; 6(Suppl 1): A21–A22.
49.
FaughtRWSattiSRHurstRW. Heterogeneous practice patterns regarding antiplatelet medications for neuroendovascular stenting in the USA: A multicenter survey. J Neurointerv Surg2014; 6: 774–779.
50.
Delgado AlmandozJECrandallBMScholzJM. Pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction units value predicts perioperative thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurointerv Surg20135 (Suppl 3): iii3–iii10.
51.
SkukalekSLWinklerAMKangJ. Effect of antiplatelet therapy and platelet function testing on hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device: A review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. Epub ahead of print 10 November 2014. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011145.
52.
MoscatoGCirilloLDall’OlioM. Management of unruptured brain aneurysms: Retrospective analysis of a single centre experience. Neuroradiol J2013; 26: 315–319.
53.
KapsasGBudaiCToniF. Evaluation of CTA, time-resolved 4D CE-MRA and DSA in the follow-up of an intracranial aneurysm treated with a flow diverter stent: Experience from a single case. Interv Neuroradiol2015; 21: 69–71.
54.
CaranciFTedeschiELeoneG. Errors in neuroradiology. Radiol Med. Epub ahead of print 17 July 2015. DOI 10.1007/s11547-015-0564-7.
55.
BudaiCCirilloLPatrunoF. Flat panel angiography images in the post-operative follow-up of surgically clipped intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiol J2014; 27: 203–206.
