Pituitary macroadenoma: Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance imaging in grading tumor aggressiveness

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance imaging in grading tumor aggressiveness using histogram apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Materials and methods

Eighteen patients with surgically proved pituitary macroadenomas were included in this study. Diffusion-weighted imaging with single-shot echo-planar sequence at 3-T with a 32-channel head coil was performed with b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm². Calculated apparent diffusion coefficient maps were generated, and a 3-D volume of interest was placed on the tumor while superimposing contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. All apparent diffusion coefficient values within the volume of interest were used to compute the average apparent diffusion coefficient of the tumor. The apparent diffusion coefficient values were binned to construct the apparent diffusion coefficient histogram. Using the histogram, the mean, percentiles, skewness, and kurtosis of the apparent diffusion coefficient of the entire tumor were computed. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram parameters were compared with the MIB-1 index, invasiveness, and recurrence for grading tumor aggressiveness of pituitary adenomas.

Results

The skewness of the apparent diffusion coefficient histogram only showed significant differences among MIB-1 indices (p = 0.030). All apparent diffusion coefficient histogram parameters showed no significant differences between negative and positive invasion. The skewness and kurtosis of the apparent diffusion coefficient histogram showed significant differences between positive and negative recurrence (skewness p = 0.011, kurtosis p = 0.011). Receiver-operating characteristics analysis between positive and negative recurrence showed that both skewness and kurtosis of the apparent diffusion coefficient achieved area under the curve at 0.967.

Conclusion

Skewness and kurtosis of the apparent diffusion coefficient histogram were the predictive parameters for assessing tumor proliferative potential and recurrence of pituitary adenomas.

Keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram aggressiveness pituitary adenoma

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Priola

Esposito

Cannavo

et al.

Aggressive pituitary adenomas: The dark side of the moon. World Neurosurg 2017; 97: 144–150.

Rutkowski

Alward

Chen

et al.

Atypical pituitary adenoma: A clinicopathologic case series. J Neurosurg 2018; 128: 1058–1065.

Dai

Feng

Liu

et al.

Refractory pituitary adenoma: A novel classification for pituitary tumors. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 83657–83668.

Mete

Lopes

. Overview of the 2017 WHO classification of pituitary tumors. Endocr Pathol 2017; 28: 228–243.

Alimohanmadi

Ownagh

Mahouzi

et al.

The impact of immunohistochemical markers of Ki-67 and p53 on the long-term outcome of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: A cohort study. Asian J Neurosurg 2014; 9: 130–136.

Donati

Mazaheri

Afaq et al.

Prostate cancer aggressiveness: Assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 2014; 271: 143–152.

Kyriazi

Collins

Pennert

et al.

Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: Assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging-Value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology 2011; 261: 182–192.

Mohamed

Abouhashem

. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in assessment of pituitary macroadenoma consistency. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2013; 44: 617–624.

Kang

Choi

Kim

et al.

Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard-or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging correlation with tumor grade. Radiology 2011; 261: 882–890.

10.

Lee

Choi

Kim Ji-H et al.

Glioma grading using apparent diffusion coefficient map: Application of histogram analysis based on automatic segmentation. NMR Biomed 2014; 27: 1046–1052.

11.

Woo

Cho

Kim

et al.

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: A preliminary correlation study with histological grade. Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 1270–1277.

12.

Rosenkrantz

Obele

Rusinek

et al.

Whole-lesion diffusion metrics for assessment of bladder cancer aggressiveness. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40: 327–332.

13.

Oner

Celik

Tali

et al.

Thin-section diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with parallel imaging. Acta Radiol 2007; 48: 456–463.

14.

Knosp

Steiner

Kitz

et al.

Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: A magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 610–617. discussion 617–678.

15.

Chesney

Memel

Pangal

et al.

Variability and lack of prognostic value associated with atypical pituitary adenoma diagnosis: A systematic review and critical assessment of the diagnostic criteria. Neurosurgery 2018; 83: 602–610.

16.

Bewick

Cheek

Ball

. Statistics review 10: Further nonparametric methods. Critical Care 2004; 8: 196–199.

17.

Zada

Woodmansee

Ramkissoon

et al.

Atypical pituitary adenomas: Incidence, clinical characteristics, and implications. J Neurosurg 2011; 114: 336–344.

18.

Tamrazi

Pekmezci

Aboian

et al.

Apparent diffusion coefficient and pituitary macroadenomas: Pre-operative assessment of tumor atypia. Pituitary 2016; 20: 195–200.

19.

Pierallini

Caramia

Falcone

et al.

Pituitary macroadenomas: Preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2006; 239: 223–231.

20.

Mahmoud

Tominaga

Amatya

et al.

Role of propeller diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of pituitary adenomas. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 412–417.