Abstract
Purpose
Weighted average dual-energy computed tomography (DE-CT) reconstructions are considered a proxy of standard CT images of the brain, recommended for routine clinical use and used as a reference standard in DE-CT research. However, their image quality has not been assessed, which was the aim of our study.
Methods
Images from 81 consecutive patients who underwent both non-contrast single-energy (SE)-CT and DE-CT of the brain on the same scanner were retrospectively evaluated. Attenuation values (HU) and SD of grey matter/white matter (GM/WM) pairs, along with SD in the posterior fossa and subcalvarial region were measured. Four readers evaluated image noise, GM/WM contrast, posterior fossa and subcalvarial artefacts, as well as overall image quality.
Results
Weighted average DE-CT GM and WM HU were significantly lower and noise higher compared to SE-CT (GM HU 36.46 v. 41.82; WM HU 28.18 v. 29.94; GM SD 2.93 v. 2.49; and WM SD 3.16 v. 2.44, all p < 0.0001). After correcting the measured SE-CT noise for 37% higher acquisition dose, DE-CT GM noise became significantly lower (2.93 v. 3.11, p = 0.0121). Measured and dose corrected SE-CT GM/WM contrast-to-noise ratio was superior to weighted average DE-CT (3.42 and 2.74 v. 1.95, both p < 0.0001). Weighted average DE-CT had significantly less artifacts on qualitative analysis.
Conclusion
Weighted average DE-CT images of the brain yield less artefacts at 37% dose reduction and lower noise at SE-CT equivalent dose. Dose-adjusted GM/WM contrast-to-noise ratio of weighted average DE-CT with 0.4 weighting factor remains inferior to SE-CT images.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
