Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been clinically accepted to accelerate the nerve regeneration process after a nerve injury or transection. We aimed to investigate the neuronal basis and the influence of LLLT on brain functional networks in traumatic patients with olfactory dysfunction.
Methods
Twenty-four Patients with traumatic anosmia/hyposmia were exposed to pleasant olfactory stimuli during a block-designed fMRI session. After a 10-week period, patients as control group and patients who had completed the sessions of LLLT were invited for follow-up testing using the same fMRI protocol. Two-sample t-tests were conducted to explore group differences in activation responding to odorants (p-FDR-corrected <0.05). Differences of functional connectivity were compared between the two groups and the topological features of the olfactory network were calculated. Correlation analysis was performed between graph parameters and TDI score.
Results
Compared to controls, laser-treated patients showed increased activation in the cingulate, rectus gyrus, and some parts of the frontal gyrus. Shorter pathlength (p = 0.047) and increased local efficiency (p = 0.043) within the olfactory network, as well as decreased inter-network connectivity within the whole brain were observed in patients after laser surgery. Moreover, higher clustering and local efficiency were related to higher TDI score, as manifested in increased sensitivity to identify odors.
Conclusions
The results support that low-level laser induces neural reorganization process and make new connections in the olfactory structures. Furthermore, the connectivity parameters may serve as potential biomarkers for traumatic anosmia or hyposmia by revealing the underlying neural mechanisms of LLLT.
HummelTNordinS. Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol2005; 125: 116–121.
2.
SmeetsMAVeldhuizenMGGalleS, et al.Sense of smell disorder and health-related quality of life. Rehabilitation Psychology2009; 54: 404–412.
3.
Welge-LussenAHummelT. Management of smell and taste disorders : a practical guide for clinicians. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2014, pp: 8–9.
4.
SzaleniecJWróbelAStrękP, et al.Smell impairment in chronic rhinosinusitis – evaluation of endoscopic sinus surgery results and review of literature concerning olfactory function predictors. Otolaryngol Pol2015; 69: 33–44.
5.
ColletSGruloisVBertrandB, et al.Post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction: a cohort study and update. B-ENT2009; 13: 97–107.
JafekBWEllerPMEssesBA, et al.Post-traumatic anosmia: ultrastructural correlates. Arch Neurol1989; 46: 300–304.
8.
MoranDTJafekBWEllerPM, et al.Ultrastructural histopathology of human olfactory dysfunction. MRT1992; 23: 103–110.
9.
HolbrookEHLeopoldDASchwobJE. Abnormalities of axon growth in human olfactory mucosa. Laryngoscope2005; 115: 2144–2154.
10.
CostanzoRM. Regeneration and rewiring the olfactory bulb. Chem. Senses2005; 30: 133–134.
11.
HeywoodPGCostanzoRM. Identifying normosmics: a comparison of two populations. Am. J. Otolaryngol1986; 7: 194–199.
12.
DotyRLShamanPDannM. Development of the university of pennsylvania smell identification test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol. Behav1984; 32: 489–502.
13.
HummelTSekingerBWolfSR, et al.'Sniffin' sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses1997; 22: 39–52.
14.
RumeauCNguyenDTJankowskiR. How to assess olfactory performance with the Sniffin’ Sticks test®. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis2016; 133: 203–206.
15.
SmejkalVDrugaRTinteraJ. Olfactory activity in the human brain identified by fMRI. Bratisl Lek Listy2003; 104: 184–188.
16.
PellegrinoRHahnerABojanowskiV, et al.Olfactory function in patients with hyposmia compared to healthy subjects - An fMRI study. Rhinology2016; 54: 374–381.
17.
KollndorferKFischmeisterFPSKowalczykK, et al.Olfactory training induces changes in regional functional connectivity in patients with long-term smell loss. Neuroimage Clin2015; 9: 401–410.
18.
BernsteinJAHastingsLBoespflugEL, et al.Alteration of brain activation patterns in nonallergic rhinitis patients using functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after treatment with intranasal azelastine. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol2011; 106: 527–532.
19.
LevyLMHenkinRILinCS, et al.Increased brain activation in response to odors in patients with hyposmia after theophylline treatment demonstrated by fMRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr1998; 22: 760–770.
20.
KaushalMEspanaLYNenckaAS, et al.Resting-state functional connectivity after concussion is associated with clinical recovery. Hum Brain Mapp2019; 40: 1211–1220.
21.
HummelTRissomKRedenJ, et al.Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss. Laryngoscope2009; 119: 496–499.
22.
KollndorferKKowalczykKHocheE, et al.Recovery of olfactory function induces neuroplasticity effects in patients with smell loss. Neural Plasticity2014; 2014: 1–7.
23.
HosseiniSFKamravaSKAsadiS, et al.A multimodal MR-compatible olfactometer with real-time controlling capability. J Med Eng Technol2020; 44: 317–323.
24.
RochkindSLeider-TrejoLNissanM, et al.Efficacy of 780-nm laser phototherapy on peripheral nerve regeneration after neurotube reconstruction procedure (double-blind randomized study). Photomed Laser Surg2007; 25: 137–143.
25.
BuchaimDVAndreoJCFerreira JuniorRS, et al.Efficacy of laser photobiomodulation on morphological and functional repair of the facial nerve. Photomed Laser Surg2017; 35: 442–449.
26.
HashmiJTHuangYYOsmaniBZ, et al.Role of low-level laser therapy in neurorehabilitation. PM & R2010; 2: 292–305.
27.
HamblinMR. Introduction to experimental and clinical studies using low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT). Lasers Surg Med2010; 42: 447–449.
28.
AndersJJMogesHWuX, et al.In vitro and in vivo optimization of infrared laser treatment for injured peripheral nerves. Lasers Surg Med2014; 46: 34–45.
29.
AkgulTGulsoyMGulcurHO. Effects of early and delayed laser application on nerve regeneration. Lasers Med Sci2014; 29: 351–357.
30.
KaroussisIKyriakidouKPsarrosC, et al.Effects and action mechanism of low level laser therapy (LLLT): applications in periodontology. Dent2018; 8.
31.
ByrnesKRWuXWaynantRW, et al.Low power laser irradiation alters gene expression of olfactory ensheathing cells in vitro. Lasers Surg Med2005; 37: 161–171.
32.
KamravaSKHosseiniSFFarhadiM, et al.Cultural Adaptation of the Iranian Version of the “Sniffin’Sticks” Olfactory Test. J Med Eng Technol2020; 44: 317–323.
33.
SmithSMJenkinsonMWoolrichMW, et al.Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage2004; 23: 208–219.
KjelvikGEvensmoenHRBrezovaV, et al.The human brain representation of odor identification. J Neurophysiol2012; 108: 645–657.
36.
JenkinsonMBannisterPBradyM, et al.Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage2002; 17: 825–841.
37.
LiX. First-level fMRI data analysis for activation detection. In: LiX (ed). Functional magnetic resonance imaging processing. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014, pp. 39–71.
38.
WorsleyK. Statistical analysis of activation images. In: PeterJMatthewsPM (eds). Functional MRI: an introduction to methods. Oxford, 2001, pp. 251–270.
39.
MaldjianJALaurientiPJKraftRA, et al.An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. NeuroImage2003; 19: 1233–1239.
40.
Whitfield-GabrieliSNieto-CastanonA. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect2012; 2: 125–141.
41.
ParkMChungJKimJK, et al.Altered functional brain networks in patients with traumatic anosmia: resting-state functional MRI based on graph theoretical analysis. Korean J Radiol2019; 20: 1536–1545.
42.
XiaoWYeLYinS, et al.Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of normal olfactory young and aged people. Med J Wu Uni2014; 35: 932–936.
43.
LevyLMHutterALinSC, et al.Role of frontal cortex in recognition of olfactory stimuli. J Inves Med1996; 44.
44.
FulbrightRKSkudlarskiPLacadieCM, et al.Functional MR imaging of regional brain responses to pleasant and unpleasant odors. Am J Neuroradiol1998; 19: 1721–1726.
45.
Garcia-CabezasMABarbasH. A direct anterior cingulate pathway to the primate primary olfactory cortex may control attention to olfaction. Brain Struct Funct2014; 219: 1735–1754.
46.
MoonWJParkMHwangM, et al.Functional MRI as an objective measure of olfaction deficit in patients with traumatic anosmia. Am J Neuroradiol2018; 39: 2320–2325.
47.
LiuJLiMPanY, et al.Complex brain network analysis and its applications to brain disorders: a survey. Complexity2017; 2017: 1–27.
48.
ZhouY.Small world properties changes in mild traumatic brain injury. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI2017; 46: 518–527.
49.
SpornsO. The non-random brain: efficiency, economy, and complex dynamics. Front Comput Neurosci2011; 5: 5.
50.
HanPWinklerNHummelC, et al.alterations of brain gray matter density and olfactory bulb volume in patients with olfactory loss after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma2018; 35: 2632–2640.
51.
HednerMLarssonMArnoldN, et al.Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2010; 32: 1062–1067.
52.
LötschJReichmannHHummelT. Different odor tests contribute differently to the evaluation of olfactory loss. Chem Senses2007; 33: 17–21.
53.
IwemaCLFangHKurtzDB, et al.Odorant receptor expression patterns are restored in lesion-recovered rat olfactory epithelium. J Neurosci2004; 24: 356–369.
54.
KobayashiMCostanzoRM. olfactory nerve recovery following mild and severe injury and the efficacy of dexamethasone treatment. Chem Senses2009; 34: 573–580.
55.
TsaiYLSuCCLeeHS, et al.Symptoms treatment for allergic rhinitis using diode laser: results after 6-year follow-up. Lasers Med Sci2009; 24: 230–233.
