Abstract
Background
The aortic arch (AA) influences catheter navigation during endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. Whether routine inclusion of the AA in stroke CT angiography (CTA) protocols is necessary remains debated, particularly in settings aiming to streamline imaging workflows.
Purpose
To evaluate whether machine learning algorithms (MLAs) can use routinely available clinical and laboratory data to estimate AA configuration in patients with stroke risk factors.
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective study, 108 patients who underwent CTA, including the AA, were analyzed. Eight MLAs were trained to classify AA anatomy as favorable or unfavorable using clinical and laboratory variables available at presentation. Class imbalance was addressed using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique. Model performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation and summarized with seven performance metrics.
Results
After class balancing, mean accuracy across classifiers ranged from 0.52 to 0.77. Gaussian copula and Naive Bayes classifiers showed the highest accuracy, while k-nearest neighbors and support vector machines demonstrated higher sensitivity. Specificity was highest for regularized discriminant analysis and the Gaussian copula. AUROC values ranged from 0.49 to 0.80 across models.
Conclusion
Routinely available clinical and laboratory data contain a limited yet detectable signal, enabling several machine learning algorithms to estimate AA configuration with moderate accuracy. These findings are exploratory and do not support modification of CTA protocols. However, they suggest that pre-imaging clinical data may provide supportive information for future workflow-oriented decision-support tools. Further validation in larger, externally tested cohorts is required before clinical integration can be considered.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
