Assessing Performance of i-STAT at the Point of Care in the Emergency Room

Abstract

Context:

Point-of-care testing (POCT) for blood gas and chemistries is widely adopted in the emergency department (ED) for fast turnaround and critical medical decisions.

Objective:

To assess performance of ED physicians compared to laboratory technologists carrying out i-STAT analysis. Impact of user skill on POCT performance was also studied.

Design:

Over a 3-month period, ED physicians performed tests with their i-STAT unit with parallel blood specimens (n=60) sent to the central laboratory to be tested on another i-STAT unit and laboratory analysers (blood gas and chemistries). Comparisons to laboratory results (obtained with ABL 520 and Beckman-Coulter LX20PRO) were carried out. Two operators from ED and central laboratory performed side by side, repeated tests on the i-STAT units. Their overall within-run imprecision were compared. The analytical performance of i-STAT was further assessed by another laboratory technologist to verify its capability to deliver good results.

Results:

Platform comparisons showed that ED physicians performed poorer compared to laboratory technologists, particularly with chloride and pO2 (Spearman coefficient of correlation — 0.49 and 0.54 respectively indicate wide scatter). This is also mirrored in the higher overall within-run imprecision for chemistries (sodium, chloride, potassium, glucose, urea and creatinine) by an ED physician (5.4%) compared to a laboratory technologist (3.7%). Including blood gas results showed an even wider gap in their testing skills. Except at a low creatinine of 67 μmol/L, the i-STAT analyser delivered precise measurements for the chemistries and blood gas parameters.

Conclusions:

Performances by medical staff with the i-STAT analyser did not adequately approach the same skill level as laboratory technologists.

Keywords

competency evaluation near-patient testing

References

Collinson

. The need for a point of care testing: An evidence-based appraisal. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1999;230:67–73.

Lee-Lewandrowski

Corboy

Lewandrowski

Sinclair

McDermot

Benzer

. Implementation of a point-of-care satellite laboratory in the emergency department of an academic medical center. Impact on test turnaround time and patient emergency department length of stay. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127(4):456–60.

Steinfelder-Visscher

Teerenstra

Gunnewiek

Weerwind

. Evaluation of the i-STAT point-of-care analyzer in critically ill adult patients. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40(1):57–60.

Meier

Jones

. Point-of-care testing error: Sources and amplifiers, taxonomy, prevention strategies, and detection monitors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(10):1262–7.

Azzazy

Christenson

. Cardiac markers of acute coronary syndromes: Is there a case for point-of-care testing? Clin Biochem. 2002;35(1):13–27.

Derlet

Richards

Kravitz

. Frequent overcrowding in US emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(2):151–5.

Abbott . Point of Care: Products and Services [Internet]. Abbott Park, IL: Abbott Point of Care Inc. [Cited 2008 May 1]. Available from: http://www.abbottpointofcare.com/Products-and-Services/iSTAT-Cartridges.aspx.

. QC for the future: Laboratory issues — POCT and POL concerns. LabMed. 2005;36(10):621–5.

Kraemer

Hogan

Eckman

Siobal

. The rise and fall of i-STAT point-of-care blood gas testing in an acute care hospital. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114(1):128–38.