This study presents car seat concepts which are designed to mitigate whiplash injuries through coordinated motion of seat components for a wide range of crash severities. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed car seat concepts, computational multibody models of a generic car seat and a biofidelic 50th-percentile male human model for rear impact are developed. A number of car seat concepts are shown to reduce the risk of whiplash injuries by utilizing head restraint support and energy-absorbing features, which remain reusable after impact.
EisV.FayP.SfercoR.A detailed analysis of the characteristics of European rear impacts. In Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington DC, USA, 6–9 June 2005, paper 05–0385-O (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
2.
AveryM.GiblenE.WeekesA. M.ZubyD. S.Developments in dynamic whiplash assessment procedures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neck injuries in road traffic and prevention strategies, Munich, Germany, 5–6 November 2007, paper 15 (TÜV SÜD Akademie GmbH, Munich).
3.
AveryM.WeekesA. M.Autonomous braking systems and their potential effect on whiplash injury reduction. In Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany, 15–18 June 2009, paper 09–0328 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
4.
EdwardsM.SmithS.ZubyD. S.LundA. K.Improved seat and head restraint evaluations. In Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington DC, USA, 6–9 June 2005, paper 05–0374-O (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
5.
FarmerC. M.ZubyD. S.WellsJ. K.HellingaL. A.Relationship of dynamic seat ratings to real-world neck injury rates. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2008, 9(6), 561–567.
6.
van RatingenM.EllwayJ.AveryM.GloynsP.SandnerV.VersmissenT.The EuroNCAP whiplash test. In Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany, 15–18 June 2009, paper 09–0231 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
7.
HellW.LangwiederK.WalzF.Reported soft tissue neck injuries after rear-end car collisions. In Proceedings of the International IRCOBI Conference, Göteborg, Sweden, 16–18 September 1998, pp. 261–274 (International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury, Zurich).
8.
GalliR. M.DiggesK. H.Severe head and neck injuries in NASS rear impacts. SAE paper 2008-01-0190, 2008.
9.
VianoD. C.ParenteauC. S.PrasadP.BurnettR.Occupant responses in high-speed rear crashes: analysis of government-sponsored tests. SAE paper 2008-01-0188, 2008.
10.
VianoD. C.ParenteauC. S.Serious injury in very-low and very-high speed rear impacts. SAE paper 2008-01-1485, 2008.
11.
KrafftM.KullgrenA.YdeniusA.TingvallC.Influence of crash pulse characteristics on whiplash associated disorders in rear impacts – crash recording in real life crashes. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2002, 3(2), 141–149.
12.
KrafftM.KullgrenA.MalmS.YdeniusA.Influence of crash severity on various whiplash injury symptoms: a study based on real-life rearend crashes with recorded crash pulses. In Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington DC, USA, 6–9 June 2005, paper 05-0363-O (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
13.
HimmetogluS.AcarM.Bouazza-MaroufK.TaylorA. J.A multi-body human model for rear-impact simulation. Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2009, 223(5), 623–638. DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO985.
14.
HimmetogluS.AcarM.TaylorA. J.Bouazza-MaroufK.A multi-body head-and-neck model for simulation of rear impact in cars. Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2007, 221(5), 527–541. DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO467.
15.
HimmetogluS.Car seat design and human-body modelling for rear impact whiplash mitigation. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, 2008.
16.
KleinbergerM.VooL.MerkleA.SzczepanowskiR.McGeeB.A comparative study of dummy sensitivity to seat design parameters. In Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Lyon, France, 18–21 June 2007, paper 07–0366.
17.
SzaboT. J.VossD. P.WelcherJ. B.Influence of seat foam and geometrical properties on BioRID P3 kinematic response to rear impacts. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2003, 4(4), 315–323.
18.
LundellB.JakobssonL.AlfredssonB.LindströmM.SimonssonL.The WHIPS seat – a car seat for improved protection against neck injuries in rear end impacts. In Proceedings of the 16th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Windsor, Canada, 31 May–4 June 1998, paper 98-S7-O-08 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
19.
JakobssonL.Isaksson-HellmanI.LindmanM.WHIPS (Volvo cars’ whiplash protection system) – the development and real-world performance. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2008, 9(6), 600–605.
20.
VianoD. C.Role of the seat in rear crash safety, 2002 (Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA).
21.
KullgrenA.KrafftM.LieA.TingvallC.The effect of whiplash protection systems in real-life crashes and their correlation to consumer crash test programmes. In Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Lyon, France, 18–21 June 2007, paper 07-0468 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
22.
HimmetogluS.AcarM.Bouazza-MaroufK.TaylorA. J.Energy-absorbing car seat designs for reducing whiplash. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2008, 9(6), 583–591.
23.
van der HorstM. J.Human head neck response in frontal, lateral and rear end impact loading: modelling and validation. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2002.
24.
CapponH.MordakaJ.Van RooijL.AdamecJ.PraxlN.MuggenthalerH.A computational human model with stabilizing spine: a step towards active safety. SAE paper 2007-01-1171, 2007.
25.
BoseD.CrandallJ. R.Influence of active muscle contribution on the injury response of restrained car occupants. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual AAAM Scientific Conference, San Diego, California, 5–8 October 2008, pp. 61–72 (Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Barrington, Illinois, USA).
26.
van Schijndel-de NooijM.WismansJ.APROSYS: Advances in secondary safety research. Int. J. Crashworthiness, 2008, 13(6), 591–598.
27.
DavidssonJ.OnoK.InamiS.SvenssonM. Y.LovsundP.A comparison between volunteer, BioRID P3 and Hybrid III performance in rear impacts. In Proceedings of the International IR-COBI Conference, Sitges, Spain, 23–24 September 1999, pp. 165–178 (International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury, Zurich).
28.
WismansJ.Results of the EEVC whiplash dummy comparison programme. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neck injuries in road traffic and prevention strategies, Munich, Germany, 5–6 November 2007, paper 22 (TÜV SÜD Akademie GmbH, Munich).
29.
LinderA.AveryM.KrafftM.KullgrenA.SvenssonM. Y.Acceleration pulses and crash severity in low velocity rear impacts – real world data and barrier tests. In Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–7 June 2001, paper 216 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
30.
LinderA.AveryM.KrafftM.KullgrenA.Change of velocity and crash pulse characteristics in rear impacts: real-world data and vehicle tests. In Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, 19–22 May 2003, paper 285 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
31.
VerverM. M.Numerical tools for comfort analyses of automotive seating. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2004.
32.
ErikssonL.Three-dimensional mathematical models of the BioRID I and car seats for low-speed rear-end impacts. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2002, 3(1), 75–87.
33.
KrafftM.A comparison of short and long term consequences of AIS 1 neck injuries in rear impacts. In Proceedings of the International IR-COBI Conference, Goteborg, Sweden, 16–18 September 1998, pp. 235–248 (International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury, Zurich).
34.
AveryM.WeekesA. M.Dynamic testing of vehicle seats to reduce whiplash injury risk: an international protocol. In Proceedings of the ICrash Conference, Athens, Greece, 4–7 July 2006, p. 11 (Taylor & Francis Group).
35.
International Insurance Whiplash Prevention Group (IIWPG). RCAR-IIWPG seat/head restraint evaluation protocol, Version 3, 2008 (Research Council for Automobile Repairs). Available from www.rcar.org.
36.
SchmittK.-U.MuserM. H.NiedererP.A new neck injury criterion candidate for rear-end collisions taking into account shear forces and bending moments. In Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–7 June 2001, paper 124 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
37.
BoströmO.SvenssonM. Y.AldmanB.HanssonH. A.HålandY.LövsundP.SeemanT.SunesonA.SäljöA.ÖrtengrenT.A new neck injury criterion candidate-based on injury findings in the cervical spinal ganglia after experimental neck extension trauma. In Proceedings of the International IRCOBI Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 11–13 September 1996, pp. 123–136 (International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury, Zurich).
38.
KrafftM.KullgrenA.LieA.TingvallC.Assessment of whiplash protection in rear impacts – crash tests and real-life crashes, 2004 (Swedish National Road Administration, Stockholm, Sweden).
39.
SchmittK.-U.MuserM.Evaluating recent seat models in rear-end impacts according to currently discussed consumer test proposals. In Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany, 15–18 June 2009, paper 09–0116 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
40.
BortenschlagerK.HartliebM.BarnsteinerK.FerdinandL.KrambergerD.SiemsS.MuserM.SchmittK.-U.Review of existing injury criteria and their tolerance limits for whiplash injuries with respect to testing experience and rating systems. In Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Lyon, France, 18–21 June 2007, paper 07–0486.
41.
IkariT.KaitoK.NakajimaT.YamazakiK.OnoK.Japan new car assessment program for minor neck injury protection in rear-end collisions. In Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany, 15–18 June 2009, paper 09–0364 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
42.
ZellmerH.StammM.SeidenschwangA.BrunnerA.Enhancement of seat performance in low-speed rear impact. In Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–7 June 2001, paper 231 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
43.
SchmittK.-U.MuserM.HeggendornM.NiedererP.WalzF.Seat component to prevent whiplash injury. In Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on Enhanced safety of vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, 19–22 May 2003, paper 224 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
44.
HyndD.WillisC.Recommendations for a low-speed rear impact sled test pulse, European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee (EEVC) WG20 Report, Document No. 166, 2007. Available from www.eevc.org.
