The charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) theory of leadership emphasizes an equifinality approach to leading, where a diverse set of styles are theorized to serve as viable routes to leader influence and success. The theory has received substantial support and attention over the past 15 years, yet there is a need to address key limitations and expand on insights from recent reviews to offer a revised and extended version of the CIP theory. We offer that each leader type emphasizes varying influence mechanisms resulting in differing dominant reactions from followers. In addition, we discuss the importance of considering mixed pathways as a key avenue for future iterations of the framework. Our proposed model addresses several criticisms of modern leadership theories by specifying how different leadership approaches elicit varying dominant follower motivational and effort mechanisms.
AllenJ. B.LovelaceJ. B.HunterS. T.NeelyB. H. (2020). Foundations of the CIP theory: An overview. In HunterS. T.LovelaceJ. B. (Eds.), Extending the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic approach to leadership (pp. 22–47). Routledge.
3.
AntonakisJ. (2018). Moving psychology forward–with charisma. The Psychologist, 31(2), 44–47.
4.
AntonakisJ.HouseR. J. (2013). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead 10th anniversary edition (Vol. 5, pp. 3–33). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
5.
ArveyR. D.DewhirstH. D.BolingJ. C. (1976). Relationships between goal clarity, participation in goal setting, and personality characteristics on job satisfaction in a scientific organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.1.103
6.
AshmosD. P.HuberG. P. (1987). The systems paradigm in organization theory: Correcting the record and suggesting the future. Academy of Management Review, 12, 607–621. https://doi.org/10.2307/258067
7.
AvolioB. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.25
8.
AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
9.
BaasM.RoskesM.SligteD.NijstadB. A.De DreuC. K. (2013). Personality and creativity: The dual pathway to creativity model and a research agenda. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12062
10.
Babcock-RobersonM. E.StricklandO. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 144, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223981003648336
11.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.Sanz-VergelA. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
12.
BanksG. C.WoznyjH. M.MansfieldC. A. (2023). Where is “behavior” in organizational behavior? A call for a revolution in leadership research and beyond. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(6), 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101581
13.
BartelsA. L.NahrgangJ. D.SessionsH.WilsonK. S.WuL.Law-PenroseJ. (2021). With a frown or a smile: How leader affective states spark the leader-follower reciprocal exchange process. Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 147–177.
14.
BassB.AvolioB. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. Mind Garden.
15.
BassB. M.BassR. (2009). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Simon and Schuster.
16.
BastardozN.Van VugtM. (2018). The nature of followership: Evolutionary analysis and review. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.004
17.
Bedell-AversK. E.HunterS. T.MumfordM. D. (2008). Conditions of problem-solving and the performance of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: A comparative experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.006
18.
BieriJ. (1955). Cognitive complexity-simplicity and predictive behavior. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043308
19.
BledowR.FreseM.AndersonN.ErezM.FarrJ. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x
BonoJ. E.FoldesH. J.VinsonG.MurosJ. P. (2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1357–1367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1357
BosnjakM.AjzenI.SchmidtP. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107
24.
BrotheridgeC. M.GrandeyA. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of “people work”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1815
25.
CaputoA. (2020). Comparing theoretical models for the understanding of health-risk behaviour: Towards an integrative model of adolescent alcohol consumption. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 418. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.2213
26.
ChenZ.TakeuchiR.ShumC. (2013). A social information processing perspective of coworker influence on a focal employee. Organization Science, 24(6), 1618–1639. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0820
27.
ChiaburuD. S.HarrisonD. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082–1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082
28.
ChristianM. S.GarzaA. S.SlaughterJ. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of Cohen, L., & Duberley, J. 2015. Three faces of context and their implications for career: A study of public sector careers cut short. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 189–202.
29.
ColbertA. E.WittL. A. (2009). The role of goal-focused leadership in enabling the expression of conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 790–796. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014187
30.
Crayne, M. P., & Hunter, S. T. (2018). Historiometry in organizational science: Renewed attention for an established research method. Organizational Research Methods, 21(1), 6–29.
31.
CrayneM. P.MedeirosK. E. (2020). Making sense of crisis: Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership in response to COVID-19. American Psychologist, 76(3), 462–474.
32.
DeChurchL. A.JavalagiA. A.NguyenK.MurphyK. (2023). Leadership and the Italian renaissance (1360–1503). Academy of Management Proceedings, 2023(1), 12349. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.176bp
33.
DeRueD. S.NahrgangJ. D.WellmanN. E. D.HumphreyS. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
34.
DinhJ. E.LordR. G.GardnerW. L.MeuserJ. D.LidenR. C.HuJ. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
EdenD.LeviatanU. (1975). Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(6), 736. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.60.6.736
37.
EderP.EisenbergerR. (2008). Perceived organizational support: Reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior. Journal of Management, 34(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307309259
38.
EhrhartM. G.NaumannS. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.960
39.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. A.Jr. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press.
40.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
41.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
42.
FrommE. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. Fawcett Premier Books.
43.
GebertD.HeinitzK.BuengelerC. (2016). Leaders’ charismatic leadership and followers’ commitment—the moderating dynamics of value erosion at the societal level. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.006
GioiaD. A.ChittipeddiK. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
46.
Graf-VlachyL.BundyJ.HambrickD. C. (2020). Effects of an Advancing Tenure on CEO Cognitive Complexity. Organization Science, 31(4), 936–959.
47.
GrandeyA. A.MelloyR. C. (2017). The state of the heart: Emotional labor as emotion regulation reviewed and revised. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000067
48.
GresovC.DrazinR. (1997). Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/259328
49.
GriffithJ.ConnellyS.ThielC.JohnsonG. (2015). How outstanding leaders lead with affect: An examination of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(4), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.004
50.
GriffithJ. A.GibsonC.MedeirosK.MacDougallA.HardyJ.IIIMumfordM. D. (2018). Are you thinking what i’m thinking? The influence of leader style, distance, and leader–follower mental model congruence on creative performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817750537
51.
GriffithJ. A.MedeirosK. E. (2020). Gender (under) representation in the CIP model: Reconsidering outstanding leadership through a gender lens. In Extending the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic approach to leadership (pp. 200–224). Routledge.
52.
HackmanJ. R.WagemanR. (2007). Asking the right questions about leadership: Discussion and conclusions. American Psychologist, 62, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.43
53.
HaleC. L. (1980). Cognitive complexity-simplicity as a determinant of communication effectiveness. Communications Monographs, 47(4), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758009376039
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
56.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. D.MillardK.McDonaldR. (2015). ‘Happy to have been of service’: The Yale archive as a window into the engaged followership of participants in milgram's ‘obedience’ experiments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12074
57.
HelmreichR. L. (1979). Social psychology on the flight deck. Paper presented at the NASA Workshop on Resource Management Training for Airline Flight Crews, San Francisco.
58.
HoggM. A. (2004). Social identity and leadership. In MessickD. M.KramerM. (Eds.), The psychology of leadership (pp. 65–94). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59.
HooijbergR.HuntJ. G. J.DodgeG. E. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management, 23(3), 375–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300305
HuntJ. G. (1999). Transformational/charismatic leadership's tranformation of the field: An historical essay. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00015-6
62.
HunterS. T.CushenberyL.ThoroughgoodC.JohnsonJ. E.LigonG. S. (2011). First and ten leadership: A historiometric investigation of the CIP leadership model. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.008
63.
HunterS.DoctorA. C.AllenM.LigonG. S. (2023). Equifinality and the key role it plays in understanding the future of leadership. Journal of Character and Leadership Development, 10(3), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v10.282
64.
HunterS. T.LovelaceJ. B. (2020a). Extending the Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Approach to Leadership: Multiple Pathways to Success. Routledge.
65.
HunterS. T.LovelaceJ. B. (2020b). Revisiting and extending the CIP theory of leadership: A modern perspective. In Extending the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic approach to leadership (pp. 254–283). Routledge.
66.
HunterS. T.LovelaceJ. B. (2022). There is more than one way to lead: The charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic theory of leadership. Cambridge University Press.
JohnsonS. K. (2008). I second that emotion: Effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.001
69.
JoshiA.KnightA. P. (2015). Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic deference to team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 59–84. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0718
70.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
71.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.IliesR. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36
72.
JunkerN. M.van DickR. (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(6), 1154–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.09.002
73.
KanferR.FreseM.JohnsonR. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000133
74.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2, p.528). Wiley.
75.
KautonenT.van GelderenM.FinkM. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056
76.
KimD.ChoiD.VandenbergheC. (2018). Goal-focused leadership, leader-member exchange, and task performance: The moderating effects of goal orientations and emotional exhaustion. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(2), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9516-7
77.
LascanoJ. J.BoatmanP. R.StrangeJ. M.WaltersK. N. (2020). Beyond outstanding to everyday: An applied perspective on CIP leadership. In HunterS.T. & LovelaceJ.B. (Eds.), Extending the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic approach to leadership (pp. 173–199). Routledge.
78.
LeroyH.AnseelF.GardnerW. L.SelsL. (2015). Authentic leadership, authentic followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level study. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1677–1697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457822
79.
LigonG. S.HunterS. T.MumfordM. D. (2008). Development of outstanding leadership: A life narrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.005
80.
LordR. G.DayD. V.ZaccaroS. J.AvolioB. J.EaglyA. H. (2017). Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000089
81.
LovelaceJ. B.HunterS. T.NeelyB. H. (2020). Advancing the CIP model of leadership: A scale development effort. In HunterS. T.LovelaceJ. B. (Eds.), Extending the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic approach to leadership: Multiple pathways to success (pp. 78–115). Routledge.
82.
LovelaceJ. B.NeelyB. H.AllenJ. B.HunterS. T. (2019). Charismatic, ideological, & pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership: A critical review and agenda for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.001
83.
LoweK. B.KroeckK. G.SivasubramaniamN. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90027-2
84.
MaitlisS.ChristiansonM. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
85.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.
86.
MartaS.LeritzL. E.MumfordM. D. (2005). Leadership skills and the group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.04.004
87.
McAdamsD. P. (2006). The redemptive self: Stories Americans live by. Oxford University Press.
88.
MilesR. E.SnowC. C.MeyerA. D.ColemanH. J.Jr (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305755
89.
MilgramS. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
90.
MillerD. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest. In MobergD & DuskaR (Eds.), The next phase of business ethics: Integrating psychology and ethics (pp. 193–210). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
91.
MischelW. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology, 333(1), 333–352.
92.
MobleyM. I.DoaresL. M.MumfordM. D. (1992). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Evidence for the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 5(2), 125–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419209534428
93.
MorgesonF. P.MitchellT. R.LiuD. (2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0099
94.
MumfordM. D. (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic Leaders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
95.
MumfordM. D.GaddisB.LicuananB.ErslandB.SiekelK. (2006a). Communication strategies–persuasion or logic: How do outstanding leaders connect with their followers. Pathways to Outstanding Leadership: A Comparative Analysis of Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Leadership, 167–189.
96.
MumfordM. D.MarksM. A.ConnellyM. S.ZaccaroS. J.Reiter-PalmonR. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00044-2
97.
MumfordM. D.StrangeJ. M.BedellK. E. (2006b). Introduction—Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Leaders: Are They Really Different?. In MumfordMD (Ed.), Pathways to outstanding leadership (pp. 22–43). Psychology Press.
98.
MumfordM. D.StrangeJ. M.ScottG. M.DaileyL.BlairC. (2006bb). Leader-follower interactions–Heroes, leaders, and tyrants: How do they relate. Pathways to Outstanding Leadership: A Comparative Analysis of Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Leadership, 138–166.
99.
NadkarniS.NarayananV. K. (2007). Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.576
OlowoseluA.bin MohamadM. A.Mohamed Farag Mohamed AboudahrS. (2019). Path-goal theory and the application in educational management and leadership. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(2), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.02.77
102.
Oz, E., & Sosik, J. J. (2000). Why information systems projects are abandoned: a leadership and communication theory and exploratory study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(1), 66–78.
103.
PickettC. L.GardnerW. L.KnowlesM. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262085
104.
PillemerD. B. (1998). Momentous events, vivid memories. Haravers University Press.
PorterM. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
107.
RowoldJ.HeinitzK. (2007). Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.003
108.
RushM. C.ThomasJ. C.LordR. G. (1977). Implicit leadership theory: A potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(77)90046-0
109.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
110.
SchunkD. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6
111.
SchynsB.RiggioR. E. (2016). Implicit leadership theories. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–7.
112.
Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16(4), 693–703.
113.
SnyderC. R.RandK. L.SigmonD. R. (2002). SnyderIn CR & LopezS (Eds.) Handbook of Positive Psychology (Vol. 257, pp. 276). Oxford University Press.
114.
StogdillR. M. (1950). Leadership, membership, and organization. Psychological Bulletin, 47(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053857
115.
StreufertS.StreufertS. C.CastoreC. H. (1968). Leadership in negotiations and the complexity of conceptual structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025852
116.
StúrmerS.SimonB. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(3), 59–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280340000117
117.
SuedfeldP.TetlockP. E. (2014). Integrative complexity at forty: Steps toward resolving the scoring dilemma. Political Psychology, 35(2), 597–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12206
118.
SussmanR.GiffordR. (2019). Causality in the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5), 920–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218801363
119.
TannenbaumM. B.HeplerJ.ZimmermanR. S.SaulL.JacobsS.WilsonK.AlbarracínD. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729
120.
ThomasH.PoracJ. F. (2002). Managing cognition and strategy: Issues, trends and future directions. Handbook of Strategy and Management, 165–182.
121.
ThoroughgoodC. N.PadillaA.HunterS. T.TateB. W. (2012). The susceptible circle: A taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 897–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.007
122.
ThoroughgoodC. N.SawyerK. B. (2017). Who wants to follow the leader? Using personality and work value profiles to predict preferences for charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic styles of leading. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(4), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9486-1
123.
Uhl-BienM.RiggioR. E.LoweK. B.CarstenM. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007
124.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.
125.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation, vol. 54. Wiley.
126.
WaldmanD. A.BassB. M.YammarinoF. J. (1990). Adding to contingent-reward behavior: The augmenting effect of charismatic leadership. Group & Organization Studies, 15(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960119001500404
127.
WattsL. L.RothsteinE. G.PatelK. R. (2020). Multiple pathways to studying outstanding leadership. In HunterS. T.LovelaceJ. B. (Eds.), Extending the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic approach to leadership (pp. 48–77). Routledge.
128.
WattsL. L.SteeleL. M.MumfordM. D. (2019). Making sense of pragmatic and charismatic leadership stories: Effects on vision formation. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.003
129.
WeberM. (1924). The theory of social and economic organizations. Free Press.
130.
WeberM. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations. Translated by ParsonsT.. Free Press.
131.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage.
132.
YammarinoF. J.MumfordM. D.SerbanA.ShirreffsK. (2013). Assassination and leadership: Traditional approaches and historiometric methods. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.004
133.
YuklG. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2
134.
ZaccaroS. J.ConnellyM. S.RepchickK. M.DazaA. I.YoungM. C.KilcullenR. N. (2015). The influence of higher order cognitive capacities on leader organizational continuance and retention: The mediating role of developmental experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.007
