Technology as a predictor of students’ virtual learning experiences in post- covid era: Empirical analysis from a Ghanaian higher education institution
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November 6, 2025
Technology as a predictor of students’ virtual learning experiences in post- covid era: Empirical analysis from a Ghanaian higher education institution
The devastating effect of the Covid pandemic negatively affect most economies while conspicuously changing the mode of interactions in the educational sector from the traditional face-to-face to a full online deployment or a blend of virtual and in-person interactions during the post covid. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of technology on students’ virtual learning experiences after the peak of the covid pandemic. Three hundred and seventy-nine (N = 379) undergraduate students participated in the study. Findings showed that the use of technology significantly predicted student online teaching and learning and also, influenced student virtual learning experiences positively. These findings will help managers of higher education institutions to invest into training and technology driven interactions to enhance students’ engagement.
AdarkwahMA (2021) “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Education and Information Technologies26(2): 1665–1685.
2.
AfriyieDKAsareGAAmponsahSK, et al. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic in resource-poor countries: challenges, experiences and opportunities in Ghana. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries14(08): 838–843.
3.
Al-SalmanSHeiderAS (2021) Jordanian University students views on emergency online learning during COVID-19. Online Leaning25(1): 286–302.
4.
AwangZ (2015) SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modeling. Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication, ISBN 978 967 110 998 4.
5.
BagozziRPYiY (2012) Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40(1): 8–34.
6.
BaraldiANEndersCK (2010) An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology48(1): 5–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001.
7.
BennisM (2023) Cyberculture in Higher Education: Narrowing the digital gap between Mark Prensky’s “Digital Natives” and “Digital Immigrants”. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies10(1).
8.
BlundellGECastañedaDALeeJ (2020) A multi-institutional study of factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning. Online Learning24(4): 229–253.
9.
CalloECYazonAD (2020) Exploring the factors influencing the readiness of faculty and students on online teaching and learning as an alternative delivery mode for the new normal. Universal Journal of Educational Research8(8): 3509–3518.
10.
ChherawalaNGillS (2020) Up-to-date reviewer of psychotherapy via video conference: implication and recommendations for the RANZAP psychotherapy written case during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australian Psychiatry28(5): 517–520.
11.
DiStefanoCZhuMMindrilaD (2009) Understanding and using factor scores: considerations for the applied research. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation14(20): 1–11.
12.
DlaminiRNdzinisaN (2020) Universities trailing behind unquestioned epistemological foundation, constraining the transition to online instructional delivery and learning. South African Journal of Higher Education34(6): 52–64.
13.
DurnaliM (2020) The effect of self-directed learning on the relationship between self- leadership and online learning among university students in Turkey. Tuning Journal for Higher Education8(1): 129–165.
14.
EssiamJO (2019) Influence of Student Engagement on Academic Performance in Higher Education in Ghana. Doctoral dissertation. Accra: University of Ghana.
15.
FlavianCIbanez-SanchezSOrusC (2019) The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research100: 547.
16.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18: 39–50.
17.
GerbingAGAndersonJC (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research25: 186–192.
GulumUE (2018) Virtual environment as a digital communication technologies-mediated folkloric experience sphere. Milli Folklor119: 127–139.
20.
HairJAndersonRTathamR, et al. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading. New York, NY: Macmillan.
21.
HallinAEDanielssonHNordströmT, et al. (2022) No learning loss in Sweden during the pandemic evidence from primary school reading assessments. International Journal of Educational Research114: 102011.
22.
IlievaGYankovaT (2020) IoT in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. TEM Journal9(4): 1669–1674.
23.
LadyshewskyRPettapieceRG (2015) Exploring adult learners’ usage of information communication technology during a virtual peer coaching experience. Online Learning19(2): 1–15.
24.
MaddalunoP (2019) The use of new technologies from virtual to pragmatic: the experience of the Luca Pacioli library. Bibliothecae.it8(2): 382–393.
MishraLGuptaTShreeA (2020) Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open1: 100012. DOI: 10.1016/j-ijedro.2020.100012.
27.
MittalAMantriATandonU, et al. (2021) A unified perspective on the adoption of online teaching in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information Discovery and Delivery50: 117–132.
28.
MokKHXiongWKeG, et al. (2021) Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on international higher education and student mobility: student perspectives from mainland China and Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Research105: 101718.
29.
MustafaDFKhursheedARizviSMU, et al. (2020) Factors influencing online learning of university students under the covid-19 pandemic. IJERI: International Journal of Engineering Research & Innovation15(1): 342–359.
30.
OhlinC (2019) Information and communication technology in a global world: teachers’ perceptions of continuing professional development. Research in Social Sciences and Technology4(2): 41–57.
31.
OsadebeFJOsadebeUP (2020) Undergraduate business education students’ perception on information and communication technology use in teaching and learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education9(2): 359–363.
32.
PaulsenFM (2002) Online Education Systems: Discussion and Definition of Terms. Norway: NKI Distance Education. Available at: https://home.nettskolen.com/∼morten.
33.
PleyersGPoncinI (2020) Non-immersive virtual reality technologies in real estate. How customer experience drives attitude toward properties and the service provider. Journal of Retailing Customer Service57: 102175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020-102175.
34.
PrenskyM (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: do they really think differently?On the Horizon9: 1–6.
35.
RazaSAQaziWKhanKA, et al. (2021) Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: an expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research59(2): 183–208.
36.
RyanEPooleC (2019) Impact of virtual learning environment on students’ satisfaction, engagement, recall, and retention. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences50(3): 408–415.
37.
ShatriZG (2020) Advantages and disadvantages of using information technology in learning process of students. Journal of Turkish Science Education17(3): 420–428.
38.
ShehzadiSNisarQAHyssainMS, et al. (2021) The role of digital learning toward students’ satisfaction and university brand image of educational institutes of Pakistan: a post-effect of COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies10(2): 276–294.
39.
ShenoyVMahendraSVijayN (2020) COVID 19 lockdown technology adaption, teaching, learning, students engagement and faculty experience. Mukt Shabd Journal9(4): 698–702.
40.
TakalamiMRayhuhaliFMapotsoK (2020) Disaster Management Act No. 57 of 2002 and its framework of 2005 in response to coronavirus: South African universities vulnerability. Gender & Behavior18(1): 15190–15201.
41.
TartavuleaCVAlbuCNAlbuN, et al. (2020) Online teaching practices and the effectiveness of the educational process in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Amfiteatru Economic22(55): 920–936.
42.
TesarM (2020) Towards a post-Covid-19 ‘new normality?’: Physical and social distancing, the move to online and higher education. Policy Futures in Education18(5): 556–559. DOI: 10.1177/1478210320935671.
43.
TseviL (2016) Quality and accreditation of private higher education in Ghana. In: A Global Perspective on Private Higher Education. Oxfordshire: Chandos Publishing, pp. 287–297.
YuanhongMYunzhongCLiangqiangL, et al. (2021) Following the flow: exploring the impact of mobile technology environment on users’ virtual experience and behavioral response. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research16(2): 170–187.
