Background: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used to assess exercise tolerance in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). However, previous research shows it to be insufficiently responsive, especially for patients with a relatively high maximal exercise tolerance at baseline. We therefore designed a 6-minute walk/run test (6MWRT), which has the same duration as the 6MWT but allows running. The objective of this study was to determine the test–retest reproducibility and responsiveness of this 6MWRT.
Design: Responsiveness was investigated in a prospective cohort study among a group of patients entering CR at Maastricht University Medical Center, with a cross-sectional part to assess the test–retest reproducibility.
Methods: Test–retest reproducibility (reliability and agreement) was investigated using the intraclass correlation (ICC) and a Bland–Altman plot of two measurements implemented in the first week of rehabilitation. Responsiveness of the 6MWT and the 6MWRT was calculated using the standard response mean (SRM) over a 6-week period.
Results: The first reproducibility analysis included 34 patients, the second 22 patients. The ICCs were 0.935 and 0.906, respectively, with limits of agreement of ±79 and ±61 m. The responsiveness analysis included 27 patients. The SRM values were 0.83 for the 6MWT and 0.71 for the 6MWRT.
Conclusions: Although the 6MWRT is a reproducible test in CR, its responsiveness is not superior to that of the 6MWT. We therefore prefer the conventional 6MWT as an evaluative measurement in CR and advise against using the 6MWRT as (evaluative) measurement in CR for this purpose.
Beers MH and Batterink J. Merck manual medisch handboek. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2005.
2.
DemersCMcKelvieRSNegassaA. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J2001; 142(4): 698–703.
3.
Heran BS, Chen JMH, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011; 7: Art. No.: CD001800. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub2.
4.
Davies EJ, Moxham T, Rees K, et al. Exercise based rehabilitation for heart failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010; 4: Art. No.: CD003331. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003331.pub3.
5.
Neubeck L, Freedman SB, Clark AM, et al. Participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2011 [epublication ahead of print].
6.
Gohlke H. Is it worth offering cardiovascular disease prevention to the elderly? Eur J Prev Cardiol 201 [epublication ahead of print].
7.
McKelvieRS. Exercise training in patients with heart failure: clinical outcomes, safety, and indications. Heart Fail Rev2008; 13(1): 3–11.
8.
MacArdleWKatchFKatchV. Exercise physiology: Energy, nutrition, and human performance, 6th edn. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
9.
CahalinLPMathierMASemigranMJ. The six-minute walk test predicts peak oxygen uptake and survival in patients with advanced heart failure. Chest1996; 110(2): 325–332.
10.
SolwaySBrooksDLacasseY. A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest2001; 119(1): 256–270.
11.
American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Resp Crit Care Med2002; 166(1): 111–117.
12.
GuyattGHSullivanMJThompsonPJ. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J1985; 132(8): 919–923.
13.
GrantSCorbettKAmjadAM. A comparison of methods of predicting maximum oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med1995; 29(3): 147–152.
14.
DrinkardBMcDuffieJMcCannS. Relationships between walk/run performance and cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents who are overweight. Phys Ther2001; 81(12): 1889–1896.
15.
CaldersPDeforcheBVerscheldeS. Predictors of 6-minute walk test and 12-minute walk/run test in obese children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr2008; 167(5): 563–568.
16.
ButlandRPangJGrossE. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)1982; 284(6329): 1607–1608.
17.
CheethamCTaylorRBurkeV. The 6-minute walk test does not reliably detect changes in functional capacity of patients awaiting cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant2005; 24(7): 848–853.
18.
GeigerRStrasakATremlB. Six-minute walk test in children and adolescents. J Pediatr2007; 150(4): 395–399.
19.
Heijblom KG, Aufdemkampe G, Peters RHJ, et al. Six minute walking test in patients with heart failure, a Dutch study. In: Smits-Engelsman BCM, van Ham I, Aufdemkampe G, (eds). Jaarboek fysiotherapie kinesiotherapie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 1998, pp.128–153.
20.
TakkenT. De 6-minutenwandeltest: bruikbaar meetinstrument. Stimulus2005; 24: 244–258.
21.
SteffenTMHackerTAMollingerL. Age-and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, Berg balance scale, timed up & go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther2002; 82(2): 128–137.
22.
O’KeeffeSLyeMDonnellanC. Reproducibility and responsiveness of quality of life assessment and six minute walk test in elderly heart failure patients. Heart1998; 80(4): 377–382.
23.
NogueiraPLealACMPulzC. Clinical reliability of the 6-minute corridor walk test performed within a week of a myocardial infarction. Int Heart J2006; 47(4): 533–540.
24.
RedelmeierDABayoumiAMGoldsteinRS. Interpreting small differences in functional status: the six minute walk test in chronic lung disease patients. Am J Resp Crit Care Med1997; 155(4): 1278–1282.
25.
LeungASYChanKKSykesK. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a 2-min walk test to assess exercise capacity of COPD patients. Chest2006; 130(1): 119–125.
26.
OlssonLSwedbergKClarkA. Six minute corridor walk test as an outcome measure for the assessment of treatment in randomized, blinded intervention trails of chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Eur Heart J2005; 26(8): 778–793.
27.
Gomberg-MaitlandMDezhengHUOBenzaRL. Creation of a model comparing 6-minute walk test to metabolic equivalent in evaluating treatment effects in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Heart Lung Transplant2007; 26(7): 732–738.
28.
RasekabaTLeeALNaughtonMT. The six-minute walk test: a useful metric for the cardiopulmonary patient. Int Med J2009; 39(8): 495–501.
29.
TerweeCBBotSDMde BoerMR. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol2007; 60(1): 34–42.
30.
Bouter LM, Van Dongen M and Zielhuis GA. Epidemiologisch onderzoek: opzet en interpretatie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 2005.
31.
KottnerJAudigéLBrorsonS. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud2011; 48(6): 661–674.
32.
BlandMJAltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1986; 327(8476): 307–310.
33.
BeurskensS. Meten in de praktijk: Stappenplan voor het gebruik van meetinstrumenten in de gezondheidszorg, Houten: Springer, 2008.
34.
AltmanDGBlandJM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician1983; 32(3): 307–317.
StreinerDLNormanGRFultonC. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford Medical Publications, 1991.
38.
Troosters T, Gosselink R, Decramer M. Six min walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. Eur Respir J 1999; 14: 270–272.
39.
WiseRBrownCA. Minimal clinically important differences in the six-minute walk test and the incremental shuttle walking test. COPD2005; 2(1): 125–129.
40.
OpasichCPinnaGDMazzaA. Reproducibility of the six-minute walking test in patients with chronic congestive heart failure: practical implications. Am J Cardiol1998; 81(12): 1497–1500.
