Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population

Abstract

Background

Accurate physical activity monitoring is important for cardiac patients. Novel activity monitoring devices may enable precise measurement of physical activity. This study aimed to validate Fitbit-Flex against Actigraph accelerometer for monitoring physical activity.

Design

A validation study with a comparative design.

Methods

Cardiac patients and family members participating in community-based exercise programs wore Fitbit-Flex and Actigraph simultaneously over four days to monitor daily step counts and minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

Results

Participants (N = 48) comprised 52.1% males, with a mean age of 65.6 ± 6.9 years and 58.9% had a cardiac diagnosis. Fitbit-Flex and Actigraph were significantly correlated in males, females, total participants and cardiac patients for step counts (r = .96; r = .95; r = .95; r = .95), though less so for MVPA (r = .81; r = .65, r = .74; r = .71). As step counts increased the differences between Fitbit-Flex and Actigraph also increased. Fitbit-Flex over-estimated step counts in females (556 steps/day), males (1462 steps/day) and total participants (1038 steps/day) as well as for minutes of MVPA in females (4 min/day), males (15 min/day) and total participants (10 min/day). Fitbit-Flex had high sensitivity and specificity in classifying participants who achieved the recommended physical activity guidelines.

Conclusion

Fitbit-Flex is accurate in assessing attainment of physical activity guideline recommendations and is useful for monitoring physical activity in cardiac patients. The device does, however, slightly over-estimate step counts and MVPA.

Keywords

Coronary heart disease physical activity validity Actigraph Fitbit accelerometer activity monitor cardiac rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boden

Franklin

Wenger

. Physical activity and structured exercise for patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J Am Med Assoc 2013; 309: 143–144.

Dimeo

Pagonas

Seibert

. Aerobic exercise reduces blood pressure in resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2012; 60: 653–658.

Kodama

Tanaka

Saito

. Effect of aerobic exercise training on serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: A meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 999–1008.

Ades

Savage

Toth

. High-calorie-expenditure exercise: A new approach to cardiac rehabilitation for overweight coronary patients. Circulation 2009; 119: 2671–2678.

Milani

Lavie

Mehra

. Impact of exercise training and depression on survival in heart failure due to coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 64–68.

Strath

Kaminsky

Ainsworth

. Guide to the assessment of physical activity: Clinical and research applications A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 128: 2259–2279.

Mampuya

. Cardiac rehabilitation past, present and future: An overview. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2012; 2: 38–49.

Wood

Roberts

Campbell

. Women married to men with myocardial infarction are at increased risk of coronary heart disease. J Cardiovasc Risk 1997; 4: 7–11.

Aggarwal

Liao

Christian

. Influence of caregiving on lifestyle and psychosocial risk factors among family members of patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 93–98.

10.

Le Grande

Elliott

Worcester

. An evaluation of self-report physical activity instruments used in studies involving cardiac patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2008; 28: 358–369.

11.

Bassett

Jr Rowlands

Trost

. Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 32–38.

12.

Plasqui

Westerterp

. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: An evaluation against doubly labeled water. Obesity 2007; 15: 2371–2379.

13.

Garatachea

Torres Luque

Gonzalez Gallego

. Physical activity and energy expenditure measurements using accelerometers in older adults. Nutr Hosp 2010; 25: 224–230.

14.

Rowlands

Eston

. The measurement and interpretation of children’s physical activity. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6: 270–276.

15.

Ferguson

Rowlands

Olds

. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: A cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015; 12: 42–50.

16.

Paul

Tiedemann

Hassett

. Validity of the Fitbit activity tracker for measuring steps in community-dwelling older adults. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2015; 1: 1–5.

17.

Schneider

Crouter

Lukajic

. Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400 -m walk. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1779–1784.

18.

Schneider

Crouter

Bassett

. Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: Comparison of 13 models. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 331–335.

19.

Tudor-Locke

Sisson

Lee

. Evaluation of quality of commercial pedometers. Can J Public Health 2006; 1: 10–15.

20.

Visovsky

Kip

Rice

. Choosing instruments for research: An evaluation of two activity monitors in healthy women. J Novel Physiother 2013; 3: 171–176.

21.

Adam Noah

Spierer

. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry. J Med Eng Technol 2013; 37: 456–462.

22.

Dannecker

Sazonova

Melanson

. A comparison of energy expenditure estimation of several physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45: 2105–2112.

23.

Orrell

Doherty

Coulton

. Failure to validate the Health Survey for England physical activity module in a cardiac population. Health Policy 2007; 84: 262–268.

24.

Frederix

Dendale

Berger

. Comparison of two motion sensors for use in cardiac telerehabilitation. J Telemed Telecare 2011; 17: 231–234.

25.

Williams

Ades

Hamm

. Clinical evidence for a health benefit from cardiac rehabilitation: An update. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 835–841.

26.

Takacs

Pollock

Guenther

. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. J Sci Med Sport 2013; 17: 496–500.

27.

Alharbi

Gallagher

Kirkness

. Long-term outcomes from Healthy Eating and Exercise Lifestyle Program for overweight people with heart disease and diabetes. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. Epub ahead of print 24 October 2014. DOI: 10/11771474515114557222.

28.

Stahl

Insana

. Caloric expenditure assessment among older adults: Criterion validity of a novel accelerometry device. J Health Psychol 2013; 19: 1382–1387.

29.

Guiraud

Granger

Gremeaux

. Accelerometer as a tool to assess sedentarity and adherence to physical activity recommendations after cardiac rehabilitation program. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2012; 55: 312–321.

30.

Cain

Geremia

. Accelerometer data collection and scoring manual for adult & senior studies 2012; Vol 1, San Diego, CA: San Diego State University, pp. 1–65.

31.

Fitbit. What are active minutes?, http://help.fitbit.com/articles/en_US/Help_article/What-are-very-active-minutes/ (2014, accessed 22 March 2015).

32.

Garber

Blissmer

Deschenes

. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1334–1359.

33.

Briffa T, Maiorana A, Allan R, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia physical activity recommendations for people with cardiovascular disease, http://www.racgp.org.au/Content/NavigationMenu/ClinicalResources/RACGPGuidelines/NationalHeartFoundationofAustraliaphysicalactivityrecommendationsforpeoplewithcardiovasculardisease/NHFA-CSANZ_PAR4CVD_2006.pdf (2006, accessed 3 May 2015).

34.

Takacs

Pollock

Guenther

. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. J Sci Med Sport 2014; 17: 496–500.

35.

Tully

McBride

Heron

. The validation of Fibit ZipTM physical activity monitor as a measure of free-living physical activity. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7: 952–956.

36.

Gusmer

Bosch

Watkins

. Comparison of FitBit® Ultra to ActiGraph™ GT1M for assessment of physical activity in young adults during treadmill walking. Open Sports Med J 2014; 8: 11–15.

37.

Fulk

Combs

Danks

. Accuracy of 2 activity monitors in detecting steps in people with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther 2014; 94: 222–229.

38.

Orrell

Doherty

Miles

. Development and validation of a very brief questionnaire measure of physical activity in adults with coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007; 14: 615–623.

39.

Pfaeffli

Maddison

Jiang

. Measuring physical activity in a cardiac rehabilitation population using a smartphone-based questionnaire. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: 61–78.

40.

Hertzog

Nieveen

Zimmerman

. Longitudinal field comparison of the RT3 and an activity diary with cardiac patients. J Nurs Meas 2007; 15: 105–120.

41.

Prince

Adamo

Hamel

. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008; 5: 56–80.

42.

Barker

Tsakirides

Carroll

. Physical self-efficacy, anxiety and depression following a 6-week cardiac rehabilitation programme. Br J Card Nurs 2009; 4: 223–228.

43.

Leung

Ceccato

Stewart

. A prospective examination of patterns and correlates of exercise maintenance in coronary artery disease patients. J Behav Med 2007; 30: 411–421.

44.

Saunders

Gray

Borghese

. Validity of SC-StepRx pedometer-derived moderate and vigorous physical activity during treadmill walking and running in a heterogeneous sample of children and youth. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 519–527.

45.

Crouter

Schneider

Bassett

Jr . Spring-levered versus piezo-electric pedometer accuracy in overweight and obese adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 1673–1679.