Cardiac telerehabilitation: A novel cost-efficient care delivery strategy that can induce long-term health benefits

Abstract

Background

Finding innovative and cost-efficient care strategies that induce long-term health benefits in cardiac patients constitutes a big challenge today. The aim of this Telerehab III follow-up study was to assess whether a 6-month additional cardiac telerehabilitation programme could induce long-term health benefits and remain cost-efficient after the tele-intervention ended.

Methods and results

A total of 126 cardiac patients first completed the multicentre, randomised controlled telerehabilitation trial (Telerehab III, time points t₀ to t₁). They consequently entered the follow-up study (t₁) with evaluations 2 years later (t₂). A quantitative analysis of peak aerobic capacity (VO₂ peak, primary endpoint), international physical activity questionnaire self-reported physical activity and HeartQoL quality of life (secondary endpoints) was performed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. Even though a decline in VO₂ peak (24 ± 8 ml/[min*kg] at t₁ and 22 ± 6 ml/[min*kg] at t₂; P ≤ 0.001) was observed within the tele-intervention group patients; overall they did better than the no tele-intervention group (P = 0.032). Dividing the incremental cost (−€878/patient) by the differential incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (0.22 QALYs) yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of –€3993/QALY.

Conclusions

A combined telerehabilitation and centre-based programme, followed by transitional telerehabilitation induced persistent health benefits and remained cost-efficient up to 2 years after the end of the intervention. A partial decline of the benefits originally achieved did occur once the tele-intervention ended. Healthcare professionals should reflect on how innovative cost-efficient care models could be implemented in standard care. Future research should focus on key behaviour change techniques in technology-based interventions that enable full persistence of long-term behaviour change and health benefits.

This study is registered in the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN29243064).

Keywords

Telerehabilitation telemedicine eHealth cost-effectiveness rehabilitation cardiac rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

European Heart Network. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. www.ehnheart.org/cvd-statistics.html (accessed 3 September 2017).

Task

Montalescot

Sechtem

et al.

2013 ESC Guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the Managemenet of Stable Coronary Artery Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2949–3003.

Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18: 891–975.

Piepoli MF, Corrà U, Dendale P, et al. Challenges in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction: a call for action. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1994–2006.

Frederix

Vanhees

Dendale

et al.

A review of telerehabilitation for cardiac patients. J Telemed Telecare 2015; 21: 45–53.

Huang

Liu

et al.

Telehealth interventions versus center-based cardiac rehabilitation of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015; 22: 959–971.

Hwang

Bruning

Marris

et al.

A systematic review of the effects of telerehabilitation in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2015; 35: 380–389.

Frederix

Hansen

Coninx

et al.

Medium-term effectiveness of a comprehensive internet-based and patient-specific telerehabilitation program with text messaging support for cardiac patients: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17: e185–e185.

Frederix

Hansen

Coninx

et al.

Effect of comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation on one-year cardiovascular rehospitalization rate, medical costs and quality of life: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 674–682.

10.

Frederix

Hansen

Coninx

et al.

Telerehab III: a multi-center randomized, controlled trial investigating the long-term effectiveness of a comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation program – rationale and study design. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2015; 15: 29–29.

11.

Ross

. ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 1451–1451.

12.

Craig

Marshall

Sjöström

et al.

International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1381–1395.

13.

Oldridge

Höfer

McGee

et al.

The HeartQoL: part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014; 21: 98–106.

14.

Ellis

Eagle

Kline-Rogers

et al.

Validation of the EQ-5D in patients with a history of acute coronary syndrome. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21: 1209–1216.

15.

Bouton

. Why behavior change is difficult to sustain? Prev Med 2014; 68: 29–36.

16.

Bouton

Todd

Leon

. Contextual control of discriminated operant behavior. J Exp Psych Anim Learn Cogn 2014; 40: 92–105.

17.

Todd

Winterbauer

Bouton

. Effects of amount of acquisition and contextual generalization on the renewal of instrumental behavior after extinction. Learn Behav 2012; 40: 145–157.

18.

Marshall

Biddle

. The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise. Ann Behav Med 2001; 23: 229–246.

19.

Kidholm

Rasmussen

Andreasen

et al.

Cost-utility analysis of a cardiac telerehabilitation program: the Teledialog Project. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22: 553–563.

20.

Taylor

Watt

Dalal

et al.

Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: a cost effectiveness analysis. Int J Cardiol 2007; 119: 196–201.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

0.10 MB

0.07 MB

0.08 MB

0.10 MB