External validity of a cardiovascular screening including a coronary artery calcium examination in middle-aged individuals from the general population

Abstract

Background

Coronary artery calcium is important in cardiovascular risk stratification, but this knowledge is based on studies with a significant selection bias. This study aims to evaluate the external validity of a screening programme including coronary artery calcium examination, and the association between coronary artery calcium and cardiovascular events.

Design

Multi-centre population based study.

Methods

Randomly selected middle-aged men and women (N = 1751) free of cardiovascular disease were invited to the examination during 2009–2010. Participation rate in the examination was 70%. Participants (n = 1227) and non-participants (n = 524) were compared regarding: cardiovascular medical treatment, Charlson comorbidity index and socioeconomic status (evaluated by cohabitation, gross income and education). Study endpoints were cardiovascular events and mortality.

Results

Non-participants had a significant higher comorbidity (p = 0.003) and a lower socioeconomic status (p < 0.0001), while cardiovascular medical treatment was alike. Over a median follow-up time of 6.5 years the cardiovascular event and mortality rates were equal (6.7% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.80 and 0.4% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.76, respectively). Adjusted hazard ratio was 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63–1.37). Among participants, the extent of coronary artery calcium was significantly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 1.92, 95% CI 1.03–3.54, hazard ratio 3.66, 95% CI 1.82–7.32, hazard ratio 6.51, 95% CI 3.17–13.36 for coronary artery calcium scores 1–99, 100–399, ≥400 AU, respectively).

Conclusions

Non-participants had a higher comorbidity index and a lower socioeconomic status, but the cardiovascular event and mortality rates were equal to those of participants. Thus, a screening programme including a coronary artery calcium examination had a high external validity regarding cardiovascular risk, but also a significant social imbalance.

Keywords

Coronary artery calcification cardiovascular prevention socioeconomic status selection bias cardiovascular disease

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Conroy

Pyorala

Fitzgerald

et al.

Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: The SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 987–1003.

Wilson

D’Agostino

Levy

et al.

Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97: 1837–1847.

Yeboah

Polonsky

Young

et al.

Utility of nontraditional risk markers in individuals ineligible for statin therapy according to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Guidelines. Circulation 2015; 132: 916–922.

Rumberger

Simons

Fitzpatrick

et al.

Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 1995; 92: 2157–2162.

Peters

den Ruijter

Bots

et al.

Improvements in risk stratification for the occurrence of cardiovascular disease by imaging subclinical atherosclerosis: A systematic review. Heart 2012; 98: 177–184.

Erbel

Budoff

. Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction using coronary imaging: Subclinical atherosclerosis: The memory of lifetime risk factor exposure. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1201–1213.

Øvrehus

Jasinskiene

Sand

et al.

Coronary calcification among 3477 asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 154–159.

Shah

. Screening asymptomatic subjects for subclinical atherosclerosis: Can we, does it matter, and should we? J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 98–105.

Greenland

Polonsky

. Time for a policy change for coronary artery calcium testing in asymptomatic people? J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 1702–1704.

10.

Nasir

Shaw

Budoff

et al.

Coronary artery calcium scanning should be used for primary prevention: Pros and cons. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 111–118.

11.

Piepoli

Hoes

Agewall

et al.

2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: NP1–NP96.

12.

Goff

DC Jr

Lloyd-Jones

Bennett

et al.

2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 2935–2959.

13.

Stang

Moebus

Dragano

et al.

Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: Identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response. Eur J Epidemiol 2005; 20: 489–496.

14.

Bild

Bluemke

Burke

et al.

Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: Objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156: 871–881.

15.

Friedman

Cutter

Donahue

et al.

CARDIA: Study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 1105–1116.

16.

Diederichsen

Sand

Norgaard

et al.

Discrepancy between coronary artery calcium score and HeartScore in middle-aged Danes: The DanRisk study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012; 19: 558–564.

17.

Pedersen

. The Danish civil registration system. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 22–25.

18.

Helweg-Larsen

. The Danish Register of Causes of Death. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 26–29.

19.

Lynge

Sandegaard

Rebolj

. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 30–33.

20.

Kildemoes

Sorensen

Hallas

. The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 38–41.

21.

Charlson

Pompei

Ales

et al.

A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373–383.

22.

UNESCO. International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011, uis unesco org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en pdf (2017, accessed 22 December 2017).

23.

Jorgensen

Jacobsen

Toft

et al.

Effect of screening and lifestyle counselling on incidence of ischaemic heart disease in general population: Inter99 randomised trial. BMJ 2014; 348: g3617–g3617.

24.

The Danish education system 2016, ufm dk/en/publications/2016/files/the_danish_education_system_pdfa pdf (2017, accessed 22 December 2017).

25.

Budoff

Nasir

McClelland

et al.

Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 345–352.

26.

Budoff

Hokanson

Nasir

et al.

Progression of coronary artery calcium predicts all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 1229–1236.

27.

Andersen

Gamborg

Osler

et al.

Income as mediator of the effect of occupation on the risk of myocardial infarction: Does the income measurement matter?

J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59: 1080–1085.

28.

Budoff

Mohlenkamp

McClelland

et al.

A comparison of outcomes with coronary artery calcium scanning in unselected populations: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Heinz Nixdorf RECALL study (HNR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013; 7: 182–191.

29.

Hoffmann

Massaro

D’Agostino

RB Sr

et al.

Cardiovascular event prediction and risk reclassification by coronary, aortic, and valvular calcification in the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: e003144–e003144.

30.

Erbel

Mohlenkamp

Moebus

et al.

Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: The Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1397–1406.

31.

McClelland

Jorgensen

Budoff

et al.

10-Year coronary heart disease risk prediction using coronary artery calcium and traditional risk factors: Derivation in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) with validation in the HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) study and the DHS (Dallas Heart Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 1643–1653.

32.

Schmermund

Mohlenkamp

Berenbein

et al.

Population-based assessment of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis using electron-beam computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 2006; 185: 177–182.

33.

Erbel

Lehmann

Churzidse

et al.

Progression of coronary artery calcification seems to be inevitable, but predictable – results of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall (HNR) study. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2960–2971.

34.

Szklo

. Population-based cohort studies. Epidemiol Rev 1998; 20: 81–90.

35.

Erbel

Eisele

Moebus

et al.

[The Heinz Nixdorf Recall study]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2012; 55: 809–815.

36.

Study timeline and procedures: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Coordinating Center, www mesa-nhlbi org/aboutMESAStudyTime aspx (2017, accessed 22 December 2017).

37.

Diederichsen

Gronhoj

Mickley

et al.

CT-detected growth of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic middle-aged subjects and association with 15 biomarkers. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10: 858–866.

38.

Schmidt

Sandegaard

et al.

The Danish National Patient Registry: A review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7: 449–490.

39.

Jousilahti

Vartiainen

Tuomilehto

et al.

Sex, age, cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary heart disease: A prospective follow-up study of 14 786 middle-aged men and women in Finland. Circulation 1999; 99: 1165–1172.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.14 MB