Does exercise prescription based on estimated heart rate training zones exceed the ventilatory anaerobic threshold in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing usual-care cardiovascular rehabilitation? A United Kingdom perspective
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2020
Does exercise prescription based on estimated heart rate training zones exceed the ventilatory anaerobic threshold in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing usual-care cardiovascular rehabilitation? A United Kingdom perspective
In the United Kingdom (UK), exercise intensity is prescribed from a fixed percentage range (% heart rate reserve (%HRR)) in cardiac rehabilitation programmes. We aimed to determine the accuracy of this approach by comparing it with an objective, threshold-based approach incorporating the accurate determination of ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT). We also aimed to investigate the role of baseline cardiorespiratory fitness status and exercise testing mode dependency (cycle vs. treadmill ergometer) on these relationships.
Design and methods
A maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test was conducted on a cycle ergometer or a treadmill before and following usual-care circuit training from two separate cardiac rehabilitation programmes from a single region in the UK. The heart rate corresponding to VAT was compared with current heart rate-based exercise prescription guidelines.
Results
We included 112 referred patients (61 years (59–63); body mass index 29 kg·m–2 (29–30); 88% male). There was a significant but relatively weak correlation (r = 0.32; p = 0.001) between measured and predicted %HRR, and values were significantly different from each other (p = 0.005). Within this cohort, we found that 55% of patients had their VAT identified outside of the 40–70% predicted HRR exercise training zone. In the majority of participants (45%), the VAT occurred at an exercise intensity <40% HRR. Moreover, 57% of patients with low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness achieved VAT at <40% HRR, whereas 30% of patients with higher fitness achieved their VAT at >70% HRR. VAT was significantly higher on the treadmill than the cycle ergometer (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
In the UK, current guidelines for prescribing exercise intensity are based on a fixed percentage range. Our findings indicate that this approach may be inaccurate in a large proportion of patients undertaking cardiac rehabilitation.
AbellBGlasziouPHoffmannT. The contribution of individual exercise training components to clinical outcomes in randomised controlled trials of cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-regression. Sports Med Open2017; 3: 19–19.
2.
AndersonLOldridgeNThompsonDR, et al.Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol2016; 67: 1–12.
3.
HeranBSChenJEbrahimS, et al.Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2011; 7: CD001800–CD001800.
4.
TaylorRSUnalBCritchleyJA, et al.Mortality reductions in patients receiving exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: How much can be attributed to cardiovascular risk factor improvements?Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2006; 13: 369–374.
5.
VanheesLFagardRThijsL, et al.Prognostic value of training-induced change in peak exercise capacity in patients with myocardial infarcts and patients with coronary bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol1995; 76: 1014–1019.
6.
KokkinosPManolisAPittarasA, et al.Exercise capacity and mortality in hypertensive men with and without additional risk factors. Hypertension2009; 53: 494–499.
7.
MyersJPrakashMFroelicherV, et al.Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med2002; 346: 793–801.
8.
PattynNCoeckelberghsEBuysR, et al.Aerobic interval training vs. moderate continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med2014; 44: 687–700.
9.
WestonKSWisløffUCoombesJS. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med2014; 48: 1227–1234.
10.
ACSM. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 9th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, 2014.
11.
BorgGA. Borg’s rating of perceived exertion and pain scales, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998.
12.
Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Cardiac Rehabilitation (ACPICR). Standards of Physical Activity and Exercise in the Cardiovascular Population. 3rd Ed. http://acpicr.com/data/Page_Downloads/ACPICRStandards.pdf (2015, accessed 15 May 2019).
13.
GhoshAK. Anaerobic threshold: Its concept and role in endurance sport. Malays J Med Sci2004; 11: 24–36.
14.
BeaverWLWassermanKWhippBJ. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol1986; 60: 2020–2027.
15.
NicholsSTaylorCIngleL. A clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing 2: Test interpretation. Br J Hosp Med (Lond)2015; 76: 281–289.
16.
MezzaniAHammLFJonesAM, et al.Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: A joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol2013; 20: 442–467.
17.
EkkekakisPHallEEPetruzzelloSJ. Practical markers of the transition from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism during exercise: Rationale and a case for affect-based exercise prescription. Prev Med2004; 38: 149–159.
18.
ZhengHLuoMShenY, et al.Effects of 6 months exercise training on ventricular remodelling and autonomic tone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Rehabil Med2008; 40: 776–779.
19.
SekiEWatanabeYShimadaK, et al.Effects of a phase III cardiac rehabilitation program on physical status and lipid profiles in elderly patients with coronary artery disease: Juntendo Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (J-CARP). Circulation J2008; 72: 1230–1234.
20.
TanSJJAllenJCTanSY. Determination of ideal target exercise heart rate for cardiac patients suitable for rehabilitation. Clin Cardiol2017; 40: 1008–1012.
21.
NicholsSNationFGoodmanT, et al.CARE CR-cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory adaptations to routine exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation; A study protocol for a community-based control study with criterion methods. BMJ Open2018; 8(1): e019216–e019216.
22.
NicholsSGleadall-SiddallDAntonyR, et al.Estimated peak functional capacity: An accurate method for assessing change in peak oxygen consumption after cardiac rehabilitation?Clin Physiol Funct Imaging2018; 38(4): 681–688.
23.
BruceRAKusumiFHosmerD. Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J1973; 85: 546–562.
24.
American Thoracic Society. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2003; 167: 211–211.
25.
BaladyGJArenaRSietsemaK, et al.Clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: A Scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2010; 122: 191–225.
26.
MezzaniAAgostoniPCohen-SolalA, et al.Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: A report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2009; 16: 249–267.
27.
HansenJSueDWassermanK. Predicted values for clinical exercise testing. Am Rev Respir Dis1984; 129: S49–S55.
28.
TaylorCTsakiridesCMoxonJ, et al.Submaximal fitness and mortality risk reduction in coronary heart disease: A retrospective cohort study of community-based exercise rehabilitation. BMJ Open2016; 6: e011125–e011125.
29.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
30.
XieBYanXCaiX, et al.Effects of high-intensity interval training on aerobic capacity in cardiac patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int2017; 2017: 5420840–5420840.
IngleLCarrollS. Cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training. Heart2013; 99: 1298–1298.
33.
MezzaniACorraUGiordanoA, et al.Upper intensity limit for prolonged aerobic exercise in chronic heart failure. Med Sci Sports Exerc2010; 42: 633–639.
34.
KatchVWeltmanASadyS, et al.Validity of the relative percent concept for equating training intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol1978; 39: 219–227.
35.
DalleckLCHaneyDEBuchananCA, et al.Does a personalised exercise prescription enhance training efficacy and limit training unresponsiveness? A randomised controlled trial. J Fitness Res2016; 5(3): 15–27.
36.
WolpernAEBurgosDJJanotJM, et al.Is a threshold-based model a superior method to the relative percent concept for establishing individual exercise intensity? A randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2015; 7: 16–16.
37.
Weatherwax RM, Harris NK, Kilding AE, et al. Incidence of VO2max responders to personalized vs standardized exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019; 51(4): 681–691.
38.
BeckersPJPossemiersNMvan CraenenbroeckEM, et al.Impact of exercise testing mode on exercise parameters in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Prev Cardiol2012; 19: 389–395.
39.
HansenDDendalePBergerJ, et al.Low agreement of ventilatory threshold between training modes in cardiac patients. Eur J Appl Physiol2007; 101: 547–554.
40.
ChatterjeeSSenguptaSNagM. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: A review of techniques and applications. J Anesth Clin Res2013; 4: 340–340.
41.
PiepoliMFCorraUBenzerW, et al.Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2010; 17: 1–17.
42.
SandercockGHurtadoVCardosoF. Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness in cardiac rehabilitation patients: A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol2013; 167: 894–902.
43.
EkkekakisPHallEEPetruzzelloSJ. Practical markers of the transition from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism during exercise: Rationale and a case for affect-based exercise prescription. Prev Med2004; 38: 149–159.
44.
McConnellTRClarkBAIIIConlinNC, et al.Gas exchange anaerobic threshold: Implications for prescribing exercise in cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev1993; 13: 31–36.
45.
HansenDRovelo RuizGDohertyP, et al.Do clinicians prescribe exercise similarly in patients with different cardiovascular diseases? Findings from the EAPC EXPERT working group survey. Eur J Prev Cardiol2018; 25: 682–691.
46.
HansenDDendalePConinxK, et al.The European Association of Preventive Cardiology Exercise Prescription in Everyday Practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool: A digital training and decision support system for optimized exercise prescription in cardiovascular disease. Concept, definitions and construction methodology. Eur J Prev Cardiol2017; 24: 1017–1031.
