Outcome of coronary endarterectomy with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease in Bangladesh: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

In this study, we aimed to review the consequences of coronary endarterectomy with coronary artery bypass grafting, and assess outcomes of this combined surgical technique for patients with diffuse coronary artery disease in a single surgeon’s practice.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed outcome of 1198 endarterectomized coronary artery in 1000 patients with diffuse coronary artery disease, who have had experienced coronary endarterectomy with off pump coronary artery bypass grafting in between 2009 and 2016.

Results

The mean age was 61.5 ± 5.5 years. Coronary endarterectomy was performed on 74.7% in the left coronary territory (43.2% left anterior descending, 26.6% diagonal, 4.9% Obtuse Marginal), and 25.3% in the right coronary territory. Post-operative intensive care unit mortality rate was 1.9%, and there were 11 (1.1%) late deaths. Mean intensive care unit stay was 36.6 ± 6.7 hours. Patients were extubated following a mean of 9.8 ± 1.25 hours. The mean duration of hospital stay was 10 ± 1 days. One-year survival rate was 97.8% and 89.5% survival rate was at 5 years follow up. However, 91.8% of patients were angina free at median follow-up of 2.5 years.

Conclusion

Coronary endarterectomy with off pump coronary artery bypass grafting is attainable and accomplishes surgical revascularization in coronary artery disease patients when there is no other alternative for sufficient revascularization.

Keywords

Coronary endarterectomy coronary artery disease coronary artery bypass graft

Introduction

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients, who are referred for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), are increasingly getting more complex with multiple comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, renal impairment and peripheral artery disease. A large proportion of these patients also have presented with history of previously undergone coronary intervention and angioplasty. Subsequently, atherosclerotic process has progressed in this group of patients and developed diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD), making complete surgical revascularization highly challenging.

In 1957, coronary endarterectomy (CE) was first reported by Bailey et al.¹ as a surgical option for myocardial revascularization. This procedure involves the expulsion of the atheromatous plaque, dismembering and isolating the outer media and adventitia layers. CE is frequently performed during CABG in order to achieve total myocardial revascularization or used to facilitate anastomosis of severely calcified and diffusely diseased coronary arteries. In the case of diffuse CAD, conventional CABG does not provide a satisfactory blood supply through the distal parts of coronary vessels.¹ The consequence of inadequate myocardial revascularization does not influence the early mortality rates, but influences the rate of native vessel restenosis that ultimately leads to long-term cardiac dysfunction. These patients have been shown to have greater risk of recurrent angina attacks, poorer stress test performance, repeat interventions following CABG and higher rate of absence from work.^2–5

This study aimed to assess the outcome of CE with off pump CABG (OPCABG) in a single surgeon’s practice and to provide details regarding our treatment strategies for patients experiencing diffuse CAD.

Methods

In between 2009 and 2016, 1000 patients were submitted to CE with CABG in a single surgeon’s practice (Figure 1). During this study, every patient was approached during outpatient department visit or by telephone and data were gathered by questionnaire. Outcomes variables of study population were survival rate, post-operative cardiovascular and neurological events, post-operative myocardial infarct (MI), re-intervention, hemodynamic instability, NYHA class and Canadian class for angina.

Figure 1.

Bar diagram illustrate number of patients undergone coronary endarterectomy in each year from 2009 to 2016.

Coronary endarterectomy technique

Standard intra-operative monitoring strategies were utilized and a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit was kept on standby for all cases. All procedures were performed through a standard median sternotomy. Heparin was used to maintain an activated clotting time more than 400 seconds during harvesting of conduits (internal mammary artery, the saphenous vein and sometimes radial artery). Almost all the operations were performed using OPCABG procedure except in a few cases where the assistance of CPB was required. We utilized mechanical stabilizers such as suction type and the compression type to immobilize the target coronary artery during grafting. A conclusive decision to endarterectomize a vessel was made per-operatively and CE was considered when localized lesion blocked a sufficient distal stream (i.e. complete occlusion), distal diffuse lesion or multi-segmental lesion, as well as when a calcified or extremely thick plaque burst, making anastomosis troublesome or hindering the stream.

Coronary endarterectomies were performed manually by slow sustain and continuous traction of atheromatous plaque with the aid of delicate Ring Forceps, utilizing the closed methods trailed by reproduction with anastomosis with pre-planned graft. The arteriotomy incision was approximately 8–10 mm long, but could be stretched out for another 5 mm in some cases, if complete removal of the plaque was not feasible. Exceptionally sensitive ring forceps (Figure 3) were utilized to build up a plane between the media and the atherosclerotic plaque. With slow sustain and continuous traction, the plaque removal was attempted, with the assistance of another ring forceps (counter traction), facilitating the expulsion of the biggest portion of plaque. Close consideration was paid to the entire expulsion of the distal segment; proximal traction of the plaque was avoided usually in the interventricular artery because of the danger of proximal dissection and the impediment of a wide septal branch, oblique branches or even of the circumflex artery. Subsequently, to finish distal anastomosis incision in the conduits was extended to coordinate the arteriotomy, with the exception of few situations where venous patch was utilized. In this study, complete proximal endarterectomy was avoided due to the possibility of competitive flow loss between the graft and native artery. To ensure complete expulsion, the atheromatous plaque was carefully inspected for a smooth distal tapper end. In addition, back flow of blood from the distal vessel following extraction of the atheroma is a consoling indication of adequate removal of atheromatous plaque and that is a special feature in OPCABG endarterectomy. In our study, longest atheroma (14 cm) was removed from right coronary artery (RCA) and also another 10-cm atheromatous plaque extracted from left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery during OPCABG (Figure 4).

Every patient was monitored in intensive care unit (ICU) for close observation and management. In early post-operative period, patient was treated with heparin (usually 2–3 hours following surgery) bridging to warfarin from the first post-operative day to the next 3–6 months. A combination of Clopidogrel with Aspirin was given orally at the dose of 75 mg o.d. for both drugs to prevent acute thrombosis within the graft as well as the endarterectomized artery. Warfarin was typically started at 10 mg daily for first three post-operative days followed by 2.5–5 mg for next 3 to 6 months with the dose adjusted according to INR level (our local targeted INR was 1.5–2.5).

Results

About twelve hundred CE were performed in one thousands patients; that is 9.9% of our study population required multiple coronary endarterectomy. The mean age was 61.5 ± 5.5 years and 78.2% were male patients. Most common risk factors associated with CAD were HTN (82.1%), dyslipidemia (76.5%) and smoking (71.9%). About two-third of study population has past medical history of myocardial ischemia and approximately 15% patients have been treated with coronary angioplasty previously. Significant number of study population has LV dysfunction; 29.7% patients has EF between 30% and 50% and 11.8% patients has EF below 30%. Majority of the patients has poor functional class; 66.1% has NYHA class 3–4 and 67.2% has CCS class 3–4. Pre-operative variables of study population are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Pre-operative characteristics of study population.

Variable	n = 1000
Age (mean) in years	61.5 ± 5.5
Sex
Male	782 (78.2%)
Female	218 (21.8%)
Risk factors
Hypertension	821 (82.1%)
Dyslipidemia	765 (76.5%)
Smoking	719 (71.9%)
Diabetes mellitus	358 (35.8%)
Family history	558 (55.8%)
Previous MI	724 (72.4%)
Angioplasty	149 (14.9%)
LVEF
EF >50%	585 (58.5%)
EF 30–50%	297 (29.7%)
EF <30%	118 (11.8%)
NYHA functional class
1–2	339 (33.9%)
3–4	661 (66.1%)
CCS Class
1–2	328 (32.8%)
3–4	672 (67.2%)
EuroSCORE	5.9 ± 1.7

MI: myocardial infarct.

More than two-thirds of CE were performed in the left coronary territory and in 43.2% cases LAD required endarterectomy followed by diagonal artery (26.6%), Obtuse Marginal (OM) (4.9%) and 25.3% in the right coronary territory (Figure 2). Conduit for LAD graft used LIMA in 100% cases in our study. The mean number of grafts was 3.3 and 88.8% patient required CABG for three or more vessels CAD. Only 1.3% patients had undergone CE with CABG surgery as an emergency procedure in this review and there were only 12.8% conversions to on-pump CABG using CPB. The quantities of graft and endarterectomies are shown in Table 2.

Figure 2.

Pie Chart represents the territory of coronary endarterectomy in a patient with diffuse CAD.

Figure 3.

Instruments used for the removal of the atheromatous plaque during off pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).

Figure 4.

Long segment atheroma removed by Professor Asit Baran Adhikary (a and b) and atheromatous plaque with stent in situ (c): 14 cm longest atheromatous plaque extracted from RCA (a); 10-cm long segment atheroma from LAD (b).RCA: right coronary artery; LAD: left anterior descending.

Table 2.

Operative data of study population.

Data	Patients n = 1000
Number of graft
X₂	112 (11.2%)
X₃	538 (53.8%)
X₄	314 (31.4%)
X₅	36 (3.6%)
Use of internal mammary artery (IMA)
LIMA	100%
RIMA	428 (42.8%)
Use of CPB
On pump	128 (12.8%)
Off pump	872 (87.2%)
LM disease	11.8% (118)
Operative criteria
Emergency	13 (1.3%)
Urgent	175 (17.5%)
Elective	812 (81.2%)
Territory of endarterectomy (N = 1198)
LAD	432 (43.2%)
OM	49 (4.9%)
Diagonal	266 (26.6%)
RCA	164 (16.4%)
PDA	89 (8.9%)
LAD + RCA	57 (5.7%)
LAD + diagonal	24 (2.4%)
RCA + diagonal	18 (1.8%)

CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; RCA: right coronary artery; LAD: left anterior descending; PDA: Posterior Descending Artery; OM: Obtuse Marginal.

Post-operative ICU mortality rate was 1.9% and there were no intra-operative mortalities in our study. No patient required ventilation for more than 12 hours. Patients were extubated following a mean of 9.8 ± 1.25 hours and mean ICU stay was 36.6 ± 6.7 hours following surgery. A mean of 1.5 ± 0.5 units of blood was transfused post-operatively. The mean duration of hospital stay was 10 ± 1 days. Only 15.7% patients developed new onset AF following CE with CABG procedure and others post-operative complications was also insignificant (3.1% post-operative MI, 2.3% renal failure, 1.1% respiratory failure and 1.4% neurological complication). Use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was very minimum in our study (only 0.8%). The mean follow-up period was 10.5 ± 2.5 months. In our review, 92.7% patients were in regular follow-up, and significantly 91.8% of our patients were angina free at median follow-up of 2.5 years. However, 88.7% of study population were free from angina at long-term follow-up over a period of 5 years. Amid this follow-up period, 85.8% of the Endarterectomy of Coronary Artery (ECA) patients were in Canadian Class l and 14.2% in Canadian Class II. The rest of the post-operative characteristics including mortality and morbidity are listed in Table 3.

Table 3.

Post-operative variables of study population.

Variables	N = 1000
Ventilation time (hours)	9.8 ± 1.25
ICU stay (hours)	36.6 ± 6.7
ICU mortality	19 (1.9%)
Hospital stay (days)	10 ± 1
Late mortality (>6 months)	11 (1.1%)
New onset AF	157 (15.7%)
Post-operative acute MI	31 (3.1%)
Renal failure	23 (2.3%)
Respiratory failure	11 (1.1%)
Neurological complications	14 (1.4%)
Use of IABP (intra-aortic balloon pump)	8 (0.8%)
Post-operative blood transfusion (units)	1.5±0.5
Back to theater	7 (0.7%)

MI: myocardial infarct

Discussion

Despite the 60-years history of CE as a treatment option for diffuse CAD, till date its application remains controversial as it conveys a higher peri-operative hazard and poor long-term survival.¹ ^, ^4–6 However, complete myocardial revascularization for multi-vessel CAD appears to reduce the frequency of peri-operative morbidity and mortality and the duration of hospital stay.^7–9 The low occurrence rate of readmission to ICU, return to theater for post-operative complications such as bleeding or cardiac tamponade, infection and stroke in these high-risk group of patients in our study with concurrent CE with CABG contrasts positively with published OPCABG articles.¹⁰ ^, ¹¹ In a previous study, Schaff et al.¹² observed that inadequate myocardial revascularization appeared to be the most critical component influencing perioperative outcome, ventricular function, early and late post-operative morbidity and mortality. Although LAD endarterectomy is thought to be more hazardous than other territory, complete revascularization of the LAD is considered a crucial determinant of the post-operative patient's recovery.¹² In our study, approximately 75% of the CE was performed in the left coronary territory with satisfactory outcome.

In a review, Djalilian et al. ¹³ described CE procedure being as yet a matter of controversy, which was also supported by other authors. Usually, we utilize the “traction technique – slow, sustain and continuous traction” to perform CE. This procedure is more straightforward, easy to perform through a little incision and simpler to reconstruct. But the potential dangers incorporate inadequate expulsion of the plaque and the “snowplow effect,” to be specific, shearing-off of the plaque in the side branches. The “open procedure” is better visualized, which may help with the entire expulsion of the atheroma from the coronary vessel and its side branches.¹⁴ ^, ¹⁵ However, this strategy is time-consuming and requires patch repair. We therefore prefer “traction technique” with careful examination of the atheromatous plaque after expulsion. Augmenting the arteriotomy was only performed when plaque may have remained in the distal vessel, which restricts the recovery of distal blood flow. Myocardial contraction in the LAD territory is more vigorous than in the RCA region, which aids in the extraction of the distal atheromatous plaque by traction technique easily from LAD artery as compared to expulsion in the RCA.¹⁹ We also observed that it was easier to remove atheroma from LAD than from RCA.

In our study, we used the LIMA to anastomose with LAD in 100% of our cases. Previously, the internal mammary artery (IMA) has been utilized cautiously as a conduit to an endarterectomized vessel, but many authors have shown satisfactory early and late clinical results with luminal patency of IMA to an endarterectomized vessel compared to great saphenous vein conduit.¹³ ^, ¹⁴ ^, ¹⁶ Acute MI due to acute graft occlusion is a noteworthy complication following CE with an incidence rate of 1.5–19%.¹³ ^, ¹⁹ The occurrence of post-operative MI in our study patients was only 3.5% compared to a study by Naseri et al.¹⁷ who observed higher postoperative MI rate of 6.8% after OPCABG with CE and CT angiogram showed complete blockage or >50% stenosis in graft and native artery. However, in another study, Vohra et al.²⁰ observed that postoperative MI rate following OPCABG with CE was 4.3%, which is similar to that of our study. Naseri et al.¹⁷ demonstrated that the intubation time, ICU stay and the length of hospitalization was not exactly the same between on-pump CABG with CE and after OPCABG with CE. One patient in our study had transient ischemic stroke with complete recovery, which was consistent with previous study by Naseri et al.,¹⁷ which found no neurologic complications. In another study, Djalilian et al.¹³ showed 9% of their patients had angina at mean 46 (SD ± 19) months follow up, while Gill et al.¹⁵ observed intermittent angina in 15% of their patients at mean 36 ± 16 month’s follow-up. ^, At longer follow-up period of 5 years, Christakis et al.²¹ observed recurrence rate of 35%. It is encouraging that 88.7% of our study population were free from angina at long-term follow-up over a period of 5 years, which is also supported by others’ study finding.²⁰ Vohra et al.²⁰ observed 10% recurrence of angina following OPCABG with CE, which is similar to findings from our study of 11.3%.

In our review of high-risk group patients, the early mortality rate in ICU was of 1.8%, which was largely attributed to LAD endarterectomy and endarterectomy multiple coronary arteries, which is consistent with findings form previous studies.⁶ ^, ¹⁴ The frequency of early mortality following CE with OPCABG has been found to be between 2% and 15%.¹⁹ ^, ²¹ With regard to CE with OPCABG, Careaga et al.²² found no deaths within 30 days in their small series of study, whereas Naseri et al.¹⁷ compared both on-pump and OPCABG with CE and found a mortality rate of 2.2% in a series of 44 patients. The number of multiple endarterectomies in our study was 18.6%, which is higher compared to other studies.²⁰ After CE with OPCABG, Eryilmaz et al.¹⁸ shows no mortality at one-year follow-up in their small group of study, while Vohra et al.²⁰ observed survival rate of 91.5% at 1 year and 87.9% at 5 years, which is comparable to findings from our study of survival rate of 97.8% at 1 year and 89.5% at 5 years.

Following CE, routine heparin infusion was prescribed to prevent thrombosis in graft or native tissue in the early post-operative period bridging to oral Warfarin for next 3 to 6 months, which is commonly practiced by other specialists also.² ^, ¹⁴ ^, ¹⁵ ^, ²³ We observed in our review that CE is feasible and is a good surgical options when only CABG is insufficient to provide complete myocardial revascularization. However, proper use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agent in early post-operative period carries better graft patency rate following CE with CABG.

Conclusion

CE accomplishes total myocardial revascularization in patients with diffuse CAD and should not be considered a contraindication to OPCABG. However, surgical skill and the patient’s selection criteria are main stream for better outcome in CE with CABG.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Dr. TS Han (Deputy Editor of JRSM Cardiovascular Disease) helped with proofreading of the draft. Dr. Han played no other roles in the content of the study.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

None.

Guarantor

Asit Baran Adhikary.

Contributorship

Ranjan R – Conception, planning, data collection, carrying out, analyzing and writing up of the work.

Adhikary D – Analyzing and writing up of the work.

Mandal S – Expert guidance to analysis and writing up the work.

Seedher A – Analysis and writing up the work.

Adhikary AB – Provide active help, guidance and valuable suggestions regarding analysis and writing up the work.

References

Bailey

May

and Lemmon

WM.

Survival after coronary endarterectomy in man.

J Am Med Assoc 1957; 164:641–646.

Ranjan

Adhikary

Saha

et al . Coronary atheroma [14 cm] extracted from the right coronary artery during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Med Univ J 2017; 10: 97–100.

Jones

Craver

Guyton

et al . Importance of complete revascularization in performance of the coronary bypass operation. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51:7–12.

Lawrie

Morris

Jr GC

Silvers

et al . The influence of residual disease after coronary bypass on the 5-year survival rate of 1274 men with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1982; 66:717–723.

Tyszka

Fucuda

Tormena

et al . Obtenção da veia safena magna através de acesso minimamente invasivo para revascularizações miocárdicas. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2001; 16: 105–113.

Livesay

Cooley

Hallman

et al . Early and late results of coronary endarterectomy: analysis of 3,369 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 92:649–660.

Berson

Smith

Woods

et al . Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: does the pump influence outcome? J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 102–108.

Riha

Danzmayr

Nagele

et al . Off pump coronary artery bypass grafting in Euro SCORE high and low risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21:193–198.

Al-Ruzzeh

Nakamura

Athanasiou

et al . Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients? A comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 23:50–55.

10.

Suzuki

Okabe

Handa

et al . Usefulness of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump therapy during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77:2056–2059.

11.

Sabik

Gillinov

Blackstone

et al . Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124:698–707.

12.

Schaff

Gersh

Pluth

et al.

Survival and functional status after coronary artery bypass grafting: results 10 to 12 years after surgery in 500 patients. Circulation 1983; 68:200–204.

13.

Djalilian

and Shumway

SJ.

Adjunctive coronary endarterectomy: improved safety in modern cardiac surgery.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:1749–1754.

14.

Mills

NE.

Coronary endarterectomy: surgical techniques for patients with extensive distal atherosclerotic coronary disease. Adv Cardiac Surg 1998; 10:197–227.

15.

Gill

Beanlands

Boyd

et al . Left anterior descending endarterectomy and internal thoracic artery bypass for diffuse coronary disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65:659–662.

16.

Beretta

Lemma

and Vanelli

Coronary ‘open’ endarterectomy and reconstruction: short-and long-term results of the revascularization with saphenous vein versus IMA-graft.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992; 6:382–387.

17.

Naseri

Sevinc

and Erk

MK.

Comparison of off-pump and conventional coronary endarterectomy.

Heart Surg Forum 2003; 6:216–219.

18.

Eryilmaz

Inan

Eren

et al . Coronary endarterectomy with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75:865–869.

19.

Ivert

Welti

Forssell

et al . Coronary endarterectomy—angiographic and clinical results. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 23:95–102.

20.

Vohra

Kanwar

Khan

et al . Early and Late Outcome After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery with Coronary Endarterectomy: A Single-Center 10-Year Experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81:1691–1696.

21.

Christakis

Rao

Fremes

et al . Does coronary endarterectomy adversely affect the result of bypass surgery? J Card Surg 1993; 8:72–78.

22.

Careaga

Salazar

Tellez

et al . Coronary endarterectomy and bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Rev Esp Cardiol 2003; 56: 515–518.

23.

Ranjan

R and

Adhikary

AB.

Coronary endarterectomy in diffuse coronary artery disease. Dhaka: LAP publishing; 2017.