New or presumed new left bundle branch block in patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract

Aims:

Using a comprehensive large prospective regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) system database, we evaluated the prevalence, clinical and angiographic characteristics, and outcomes in patients with ischemic symptoms and new or presumed new left bundle branch block (LBBB). We then tested a new hierarchical diagnosis and triage algorithm to identify more accurately new LBBB patients with an acute culprit lesion.

Methods and results:

From March 2003 to June 2013, 3903 consecutive STEMI patients were treated using the Minneapolis Heart Institute regional STEMI protocol including 131 patients (3.3%) with new LBBB. These patients had fewer culprit arteries (54.2% vs. 86.4%; P<0.001), were older, more commonly women, with a lower ejection fraction, and more frequently presented with cardiac arrest or heart failure than those without new LBBB. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality accounting for baseline differences was higher in patients with new LBBB (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.58; P=0.007). The new algorithm yielded high sensitivity (97%) and negative predictive value (94%) for identification of a culprit lesion. Using the definition of new LBBB with either hemodynamically unstable features or Sgarbossa concordance criteria on electrocardiogram (ECG), 45% of new LBBB patients would have been treated as ‘STEMI equivalent’.

Conclusion:

Patients with acute ischemic symptoms and new LBBB represent a high-risk population with unique clinical challenges. If validated in an independent dataset, the new algorithm may improve the diagnostic accuracy regarding reperfusion therapy for new LBBB patients.

Keywords

STEMI guidelines new left bundle branch block emergent percutaneous coronary intervention acute myocardial infarction STEMI

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antman

Anbe

Armstrong

et al .; American Heart Association; Canadian Cardiovascular Society. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction – executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 671–719.

Antman

Hand

Armstrong

et al . 2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Writing on Behalf of the 2004 Writing Committee. Circulation 2008; 117: 296–329.

Task Force on the Management of ST-segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); Steg

James

Atar

et al . ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569–2619.

Windecker

Kolh

Alfonso

et al . 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541–2619.

Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 1994; 343: 311–322.

Sgarbossa

Pinski

Barbagelata

et al . Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 481–487.

Gula

Dick

Massel

. Diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in the setting of left bundle branch block: prevalence and observer variability from a large community study. Coron Artery Dis 2003; 14: 387–393.

Wong

French

Aylward

et al .; HERO-2 Trial Investigators. Patients with prolonged ischemic chest pain and presumed-new left bundle branch block have heterogeneous outcomes depending on the presence of ST-segment changes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 29–38.

Grines

Browne

Marco

et al . A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 673–679.

10.

Zijlstra

de Boer

Hoorntje

et al . A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 680–684.

11.

Andersen

Nielsen

Rasmussen

et al .; DANAMI-2 Investigators. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 733–742.

12.

Keeley

Boura

Grines

. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 361: 13–20.

13.

Dalby

Bouzamondo

Lechat

et al . Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2003; 108: 1809–1814.

14.

Henry

Atkins

Cunningham

et al . ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: recommendations on triage of patients to heart attack centers: is it time for a national policy for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1339–1345.

15.

Busk

Maeng

Rasmussen

et al .; DANAMI-2 Investigators. The Danish multicentre randomized study of fibrinolytic therapy vs. primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (the DANAMI-2 trial): outcome after 3 years follow-up. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1259–1266.

16.

Neeland

Kontos

de Lemos

. Evolving considerations in the management of patients with left bundle branch block and suspected myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 96–105.

17.

Larson

Menssen

Sharkey

et al . “False-positive” cardiac catheterization laboratory activation among patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2007; 298: 2754–2760.

18.

Yeo

Amsterdam

et al . Comparison of clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction with versus without new or presumed new left bundle branch block (from NCDR®). Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 497–501.

19.

Henry

Unger

Sharkey

et al . Design of a standardized system for transfer of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction for percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 373–384.

20.

Henry

Sharkey

Burke

et al . A regional system to provide timely access to percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007; 116: 721–728.

21.

Alpert

Thygesen

Antman

et al . Myocardial infarction redefined – a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 959–969.

22.

Jain

Ting

Bell

et al . Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 1111–1116.

23.

Lopes

Siha

et al . Diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 2011; 108: 782–788.

24.

Al-Faleh

Wagner

et al .; ASSENT 2 and 3 Investigators. Unraveling the spectrum of left bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT 2 and 3) trials. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 10–15.

25.

Sgarbossa

Pinski

Topol

et al . Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 105–110.

26.

Barron

Rundle

et al . Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 690–697.

27.

Bogale

Orn

James

et al .; OPTIMAAL Investigators. Usefulness of either or both left and right bundle branch block at baseline or during follow-up for predicting death in patients following acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 647–650.

28.

Moreno

García

López

et al . Implications of left bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 401–403.

29.

Guerrero

Harjai

Stone

et al . Comparison of the prognostic effect of left versus right versus no bundle branch block on presenting electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty in the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 482–488.

30.

Vivas

Pérez-Vizcayno

Hernández-Antolín

et al . Prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105: 1276–1283.

31.

Hackel

Wagner

Ratliff

et al . Anatomic studies of the cardiac conducting system in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1972; 83: 77–81.

32.

Tabas

Rodriguez

Seligman

et al . Electrocardiographic criteria for detecting acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52: 329–336.e1.

33.

Kontos

Aziz

Chau

et al . Outcomes in patients with chronicity of left bundle-branch block with possible acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 698–704.

34.

Smith

Dodd

Henry

et al . Diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block with the ST-elevation to S-wave ratio in a modified Sgarbossa rule. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60: 766–776.

35.

Mahajan

Jarolim

. How to interpret elevated cardiac troponin levels. Circulation 2011; 124: 2350–2354.

36.

Cai

Mehta

Sgarbossa

et al . The left bundle-branch block puzzle in the 2013 ST-elevation myocardial infarction guideline: from falsely declaring emergency to denying reperfusion in a high-risk population. Are the Sgarbossa Criteria ready for prime time? Am Heart J 2013; 166: 409–413.